Tom of Hilarity Ensues has taken it upon himself to wrap up the 2015 series. You remember the 2015 series, right?

Anyway, it's got blood and violence and guns and knives and explodey things.

The only question left is whether Jeff's going to tack on an epilogue.

Posted by: Harvey at 10:41 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 53 words, total size 1 kb.

(Introduction)

Love is the binding that holds you to your dreams. Love does not come over you, rather you choose to love. Only when you choose to love one forever and you stand by that dedication of love will you truly love for life and live happily every after.

(CAUTION: Romantics beware - comments may contain naughtiness)

Posted by: Harvey at 10:37 PM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 63 words, total size 1 kb.

(click to enlarge)

Attempting to thow a bone to the liberals, President Bush appointed Michael Moore as Secretary of the Treasury. The results were predictable.

What was less predictable was that Moore agreed to resign his post after the complete production run of the new bill was shoved up his ass by Donald Rumsfeld.

(Hat tip to the delightful SondraK of Knowledge Is Power for the pic)

Posted by: Harvey at 10:23 PM | Comments (3) | Add Comment
Post contains 73 words, total size 1 kb.

Sandor of The Zoo has the first draft of a chart indicating the political positions of various & sundry bloggers. He'll be updating it twice monthly as an ongoing thing, so you can still get your spot on the graph of fame. All the how-to's can be found here.

I can't help noticing that no-one's fallen into "Left Authoritarian" quadrant yet. Where the hell is the League of Liberals when you need them?

Posted by: Harvey at 09:26 PM | Comments (3) | Add Comment
Post contains 81 words, total size 1 kb.

Filthy Lie Assignment Reminder: Evil Glenn's Independence Day

Wednesday Linky Stuff

Precision Guided Humor Round-up: Air America's Excuses

New PGH assignment: Michael Moore's Theme Song

A couple late assignments

Posted by: Harvey at 09:19 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 37 words, total size 1 kb.

(A PRECISION GUIDED HUMOR ASSIGNMENT)

Air America, the sleazy, pathetic commercial propaganda arm of the DNC, is having (and I'm being polite here) a few minor financial difficulties, and may not last much longer. When it finally goes off the air in bankrupt humiliation (my dead pool pick is February - I figure they'll be completely irrelevant after the inauguration), there's going to be lots of finger-pointing and blame passed around. There's also going to be a dervish of spin put on the "why" of the failure, and I expect it to give rise to such excuses as the following:

Contract with Satan guaranteeing Air America's success found invalid due to not being signed in blood.

Al Franken's thick glasses kept accidentally setting the studio on fire.

Randi Rhodes didn't talk about her nipples enough.

Too much money wasted on salaries, not enought spent on bribes to Clear Channel executives.

Rush Limbaugh depleted the nation's supply of Oxycontin, so not enough was available to make Air America's hosts witty and insightful.

Digital brownshirts kept smashing people's radios

Al Franken is Jewish, so Bushitler had him gassed.

The fact that Al Franken is still alive does NOT disprove this theory.

Air America staff constantly attacked by vicious hordes of rats and cockroaches, who, apparently, didn't appreciate the competition.

The Air America signal simply wouldn't carry. Not surprising, since vibrations in the electomagnetic spectrum tend to vote Republican.

Nobody was buying commerical spots. Even a NAMBLA spokesman was quoted as saying "we don't want our reputation soiled by these degenerates".

Air America had to shut down because of the McCain-Feingold campaign finance laws, which expressly forbid such things as speaking in direct support of a candidate, or speaking at all if you're dumber than a bucket of monkey spunk.

Although Al Franken created a lot of great material he would often flush the toilet before it could be retrieved.

I tell ya, I'll be sorry to see 'em go...

SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS!

Posted by: Harvey at 07:36 PM | Comments (3) | Add Comment
Post contains 336 words, total size 3 kb.

1 "Randi Rhodes didn't talk about her nipples enough." ::shudder::

Posted by: physics geek at July 01, 2004 07:28 AM (Xvrs7)

2 Randi Rhodes was from down here. I found her to be the most irritating talking head in the world. I was amazed when she got picked up. She had full plastic surgery, she was damn ugly, and when they finished, she was still ugly. Blech.

Posted by: at July 01, 2004 07:53 AM (FnSa2)

3 Oops. Sorry. Me again. Sometimes I forget to enter ANY information!

Posted by: Boudicca at July 01, 2004 04:26 PM (FnSa2)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Dana of Note-It Posts celebrates 1 year of blogging today, with a little year in review post.

One of my favorite sections:

September 27, 2003 I posted who would be in my fantasy blogger harem.

October 3, 2003 I offered my boobies for charity (how's THAT for a welfare replacement?).

October 4, 2003 I began participating in miniluv's week-long Good News Blogging Challenge.

October 7, 2003 was the date of my first Top Ten - the Top Ten Reasons Not to Vote for Howard Dean.

November 17, 2003 - my first Linkified Lyrics, Toby Kieth's I Love This Bar.

December 3, 2003 I launched Bloggers With Boobies. Bloggers Who Support Bloggers With Boobies followed on December 7th.

I gotta run to work now, so you'll have to go to Dana's place for the linkified versions of these lines.

As a consolation, I'll give you the link to a picture of her in a slightly-too-thin cotton camisole.

Posted by: Harvey at 07:37 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 170 words, total size 1 kb.

Ok, so now you've snuck in to see Flabbyass 9 1/2 (or whatever the hell it's called) and you've taken some notes and you're all set to rip His Hugeness a new one.

Then you realize that there are about 6.02x10²³ different lies that need fisking. What a daunting task! Whatever will you do?

Via Physics Geek, I've learned that you can go to Fahrenheit Fact and see which chunks-o-crap have already been neutralized. Link the best, fisk the rest, and still have time to go out drinking.

Or just download the site to your PDA, go out drinking anyway, and read it over while you're nursing the hangover the next morning. Whichever.

Posted by: Harvey at 10:49 PM | Comments (5) | Add Comment
Post contains 119 words, total size 1 kb.

(Introduction)

Speak softly my love, hold me close against your heart... because my life is yours

(CAUTION: Romantics beware - comments may contain naughtiness)

Posted by: Harvey at 10:36 PM | Comments (6) | Add Comment
Post contains 30 words, total size 1 kb.

(click to enlarge)

[25 325]

As always, when looking between the amount you're paid and the amount you've actually earned, you'll find someone from the government with an arrogant little smirk on his face.

Posted by: Harvey at 10:33 PM | Comments (9) | Add Comment
Post contains 38 words, total size 1 kb.

Ya know what I love about lefties? It's the way they respect everybody's diversity of opinion and never let a civilized discourse devolve into a series of ad hominem attacks. It's the way they keep a conversation rooted in fact and never let strong emotions cloud their judgement. It's...

Screw it. I can't do this with a straight face.

That, and I'm pretty well pissed.

Remember Michele? She's that nice lady I blogged about recently with the Showcase entry who'd had a political epiphany and abandoned the left for greener pastures.

I also mentioned that some of her former friends reacted by taking a virtual crap in her comments, so I asked the kind-hearted among you to give her some support. A lot of people did, and she appreciated it.

Some of her former friends, however, decided that the best way to deal with the situation was to hijack her blog. Straight up destroy the content and leave a rude message on the scorched earth where some fine writing once stood. Just in case the cowards cut & run, here's a screenshot of their handiwork:

(click to enlarge)

Unable to respond in any rational manner they showed their true pack-of-diseased-hyena colors by stealing intellectual property and issuing threats.

I'm suprised there weren't any giant puppets involved.

On the bright side, Michele managed to transfer all her old posts to a new site and will continue blogging in the face of despicable thuggery.

To the miserable pieces of shit that perpetrated the offense:

Fuck you.

And the horse you rode in on.

And the little dog that followed your horse into town.

Especially that little dog.

Assholes.

UPDATE 6-30-04 12:10AM: Blogspot has removed the offending site. Good thing I've got the screenshot as proof. more...

Posted by: Harvey at 05:35 PM | Comments (26) | Add Comment
Post contains 329 words, total size 3 kb.

1 Sounds like she should be a MuNuvian!!! Why don't you drop Pixy an e-mail?

Posted by: Madfish Willie at June 29, 2004 07:30 PM (0pRbT)

2 Why is it that we never hear about people on the right doing things like this? "Liberals: Crushing your dissent, then claiming to be more open-minded than you." What a wonderful philosophy. Hypocrites.

Posted by: CD at June 29, 2004 07:38 PM (f97u+)

3 Oh, and if you're wondering what inspired that comment, Moorewatch was hit by a Denial of Service attack recently, presumably by Mikey Moore fans who disagreed with them.

Posted by: CD at June 29, 2004 07:40 PM (f97u+)

4 Holy sh--! I don't even know what to say! Let me get this straight... these are liberals, who are all about free speech... right? I mean aren't they the ones that are angry about FCC sanctions etc?

Posted by: Boudicca at June 29, 2004 07:45 PM (oshZe)

5 Assholes. Good for her though. Don't let the bastards get ya down.

Posted by: Tammi at June 29, 2004 08:09 PM (UTT/j)

6 To tell you the truth I'm surprised this doesn't happen more often. Check out Slashdot comments - there's a LOT of liberalism in them thar computer geeks. I think most of them find hacking blogs to be beneath them and that's the only thing that has saved us so far. But be prepared. If blogs gain as much influence as people who blog believe they can - there will be more and more incidents like this - on all types of blogs. I just hope that site defacement doesn't pick up the allure it held in the mid 90's. It was almost a requirement to deface a site if you wanted to call yourself a true hacker/cracker. *sigh*

Posted by: Teresa at June 29, 2004 10:05 PM (nAfYo)

7 Madfish is right, let's ask her over to Munu. I cannot believe this happened. It's exactly why I wanted to avoid voting in the Showcase, but I cannot believe it's already turned to this. Thank goodness Michele had the sense to fight back rather than take the easy route of giving up.

Posted by: Simon at June 29, 2004 10:38 PM (OyeEA)

8 Remember, we on the Right are the Digital Brownshirts! I mean, it's our job to act like boorish louts, shut down sites we don't like, and be cruel to those that fall away from the Truth. But oddly, the Left is doing such a fine job, I think we'll need to start kicking kittens and drinking puppies just to get back in the running.

Posted by: Russell at June 29, 2004 10:47 PM (u5uqs)

9 Ok, I put up a post at Ellis Island. Go give her a "YAY!" http://ellisisland.mu.nu/archives/033913.php

Posted by: Harvey at June 29, 2004 11:46 PM (ubhj8)

10 LOL! Harvey, you are one of the less than astute persons waxing outraged over the entry I wrote saying blogging is a mixed bag. And, at the same time, you are proving what I said is accurate. This incident is exactly the kind of misbehavior common in the blogosphere that people, especially newbies, need to know about. So is your effort to put a needless political spin on it. (Hat tip to CD.) I will try to remember to revisit the topic in an upcoming Blogospherics column. For now, newcomers should know: 1) There are many issues involved in having comments sections (including the fact that Blogger does not offer built-in support). You will want to weigh whether you want the hassle before deciding. 2) Your password for your main blog should be guarded. The friend you gave it to on Monday will transmogrify into an enemy and spam or erase your site Friday. Ditto for hosting. You probably want to stick with the bigger, impersonal blog hosts, not your pal Frank who is offering you space on his server cheap . . . until he thinks you crossed him in some way. I've a couple of issues for Harvey, he who criticizes people who know what they are talking about while doing a bad job himself. 1) This entry, rambling and poorly written, and used as an opportunity to take pot shots at one's political 'enemies' exemplifies bad blogging. 2) The word 'exemplify' is used properly in the sentence above. It is not used properly as an introduction in your comments section, Harvey. Exemplifies means demonstrates. You need to use a a word synonymous with 'says' to introduce comments.

Posted by: Mac Diva at June 30, 2004 01:10 PM (lDKyE)

11 Correction: I misread CD. Apparently, he is another member of this little Right Wing circle jerk.

Posted by: Mac Diva at June 30, 2004 01:14 PM (lDKyE)

12 Mac Diva: You are weary, stale, flat and unprofitable. You are grimy squalid, nasty and profane. You are foul and disgusting. You're a fool, an ignoramus. Monkeys look down the evolutionary chain at you. Even sheep won't have sex with you. You are unreservedly pathetic, starved for attention, and lost in a land that reality forgot. And what meaning do you expect your delusional self-important statements of unknowing, inexperienced opinion to have with us? What fantasy do you hold that you would believe that your tiny fisted tantrums would have more weight than that of a leprous desert rat, spinning rabidly in a circle, waiting for the bite of the snake? You are a waste of flesh. You have no rhythm. You are ridiculous and obnoxious. You are the moral equivalent of a leech. You are a living emptiness, a meaningless void. You are sour and senile. You are a disease, you puerile one-handed slack-jawed drooling meat slapper. On a good day you are a half-wit. You remind me of drool. You are deficient in all that lends character. You have the personality of wall paper. You are dank and filthy. You are asinine and benighted. You are the source of all unpleasantness. You spread misery and sorrow wherever you go. You smarmy lagerlout git. You bloody woofer sod. Bugger off pillock. You grotty wanking oik artless base-court apple-john. You clouted boggish foot-licking twit.You churlish boil-brained clotpole ponce. You gormless crook-pated tosser. You craven dewberry pisshead cockup patting naff. You gob kissing gleeking flap-mouthed coxcomb. You dread-bolted fobbing beef-witted clapper-clawed flirt-gill. You are a fiend and a coward, and you have bad breath. You are degenerate, noxious and depraved. I feel debased just for knowing you exist. I despise everything about you, and wish you would go away. You Socialist Shitstains For Stalin™. Fuck you if you don’t like it, so forward any objections to your Anal cavity .

Posted by: Madfish Willie at June 30, 2004 03:06 PM (0pRbT)

13 And if you give Harvey any more shit, you'll be on the list for Clobberin' Time... I've seen Clobberin' Time, and it ain't pretty....

Posted by: Madfish Willie at June 30, 2004 03:11 PM (0pRbT)

14 Wow. So I gather I now know what a troll is? Me thinks she is ranting on your blog so she can increase her ecosystem standings. That is all. I say ignore her and definitely nobody LINK to her! Blech. OH, And I'm going to try to stay on MW's good side. I think that "What fantasy do you hold that you would believe that your tiny fisted tantrums would have more weight than that of a leprous desert rat, spinning rabidly in a circle, waiting for the bite of the snake?" may very well have been my favorite. LOL!

Posted by: Boudicca at June 30, 2004 03:25 PM (wLXgf)

15 Wait... how am *I* the one putting the political spin on this? Did you NOT read what Michele's enemies put on the hijacked blog space? Oh, and exemplifies doesn't mean "demonstrates" it means "illustrates by example or serves as an example of" I chose "exemplified", not because I think that a comment is an exemplification, but because it fit the "Example" theme, and it wasn't too big of a conceptual stretch, definitionally, since a comment can be thought of as an "example" of what someone thinks. Look, I'm a silly guy and I say silly things. I know what words mean, and I'm quite familiar with the rules of grammar and punctuation. I will bend or break those rules as I see fit for purposes of entertainment or communication. Just out of curiosity, do you go around busting Shakespeare's chops for making up words?

Posted by: Harvey at June 30, 2004 03:29 PM (ubhj8)

16 I was just logging back on to harass her about the exemplify thing, but you did it. Have I told you lately, Harvey, how I have lost all tolerance for the self-righteous??? Hugs and kisses from an adoring Blog Daughter!

Posted by: Boudicca at June 30, 2004 03:38 PM (wLXgf)

17 I was going to respond to the troll, but then I realized that it wasn't making any sense. And, of course, MW pretty much said everything I wanted to say.

Posted by: CD at June 30, 2004 04:05 PM (f97u+)

18 Um, did Mac Diva say Blogger does not offer built-in comment support? If so, she's wrong. It most certainly does. It's a relatively recent new feature (a couple of months) but it's there if you wanna use it. I was already using HaloScan so I'm sticking with it for now but I can switch over anytime, or use both!

Posted by: RadarRider at June 30, 2004 04:22 PM (OaTVj)

19 RR - Mac Diva is WRONG about something? [eyes bugging in complete shock and horror] And this line: "You need to use a a word synonymous with 'says' to introduce comments" Need? NEED? Well, I suppose if my readers all just stepped off the short bus, she might be right. Personally, I give my droppers-by a little credit for being able to make sense of my verbal flippancies. Maybe she's projecting, based on the 60-watt bulbs that comprise HER readership?

Posted by: Harvey at June 30, 2004 04:35 PM (ubhj8)

20 When I first came across "Bad Money", I read everything. Yes, it was funny, pervy and had good links, but it was more than the sum of it's parts. There was a sense of compassion and decency. That is evident now. Harvey, you are a gentleman, Sir!

Posted by: Sally at June 30, 2004 05:52 PM (a1D32)

21 [blushing] aw shucks :-) Thank goodness I've got the Bartender around for those times when compassion and decency simply Will. Not. Do. And Sally... don't tell anyone about the compassion & decency thing. I've got my reputation to think of ;-)

Posted by: Harvey at June 30, 2004 11:00 PM (ubhj8)

22 I've had the same thing happen to me as happened to Michele; I changed my political views after 9/11 and lost many friends because of that, in a very public way. It was a very difficult thing to go through and I am still dealing with some of my former friends in my comments. (I couldn't find Michele's email or I would have emailed her directly) Michele, just stay true to yourself, that's what matters. It's going to be a struggle because the friends you left on the left will now think of you as a enemy; they cannot separate the politics from the personal and they cannot understand people who break out of the flock and refuse to be sheep. As for Mac Diva, she seems to turn up everywhere, mostly uninvited and spewing lessons on how to blog because she sees herself as some kind of blogging expert who has it all figured out. The only thing she has figured out is how to inflate her own ego with imaginary greatness.

Posted by: michele at July 02, 2004 04:41 AM (c9A+j)

23 She's a legend in her own mind!

Posted by: Madfish Willie at July 02, 2004 12:32 PM (yN46R)

24 Oh wow -- Madfish Willie you are my hero. I've seen that crusty wankstain Mac Diva's musty anal drippings on too many blog comment sections, not to mention I once made the mistake of reading its own blog. It took me months to rinse the smell of poo out of my computer.

Posted by: Andrea Harris at July 02, 2004 08:24 PM (WNIT4)

25 My pleasure, Ms Andrea... there's plenty more where that come from too!

Posted by: Madfish Willie at July 03, 2004 11:35 AM (yN46R)

26 Wow! That was truly a thing of beauty, Willie. Makes me homesick for the old days of alt.rec.flame before semi-literacy took over the 'Net. Been a long time since I've seen "naff", "ponce", "churlish" and "gormless" used properly in context. Well done, sir.

Posted by: Ironbear at July 04, 2004 01:14 AM (k4doI)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Eric of Straight White Guy sent me a link to a briefing on Sudan's checkered past involvement in terrorist activities.

That's got my attention, but... 1996?

I'm still looking for a recent threat assessment, and some arguments that it's better for the war effort that we invest our blood in Sudan instead of elsewhere, or whether we really need to keep our boys freed up & flexible, so as to deter the major anal irritants (N. Korea, Iran, Syria) from trying anything funny should they get it in their heads that we don't have the manpower to respond.

UPDATE: 1998 (also from Eric) - a little more informative.

Posted by: Harvey at 11:39 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 120 words, total size 1 kb.

(Introduction)

In her love, I am the hero, the king, the poet, and alive.

(CAUTION: Romantics beware - comments may contain naughtiness)

Posted by: Harvey at 11:16 PM | Comments (7) | Add Comment
Post contains 28 words, total size 1 kb.

(click to enlarge)

As a follow-up to the popular State Quarters Program, the Treasury released the first in the series of "Alcoholic Beverage Mascot Dollars", featuring Captain Morgan. Coming soon: The Budweiser Frogs and Spuds McKenzie.

Posted by: Harvey at 11:14 PM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 42 words, total size 1 kb.

Precision Guided Humor assignment reminder:
What excuses will Air America come up with to explain their poor performance?
Due Wednesday by 8pm.

Monday Linky Stuff

Posted by: Harvey at 09:10 PM | Comments (5) | Add Comment
Post contains 33 words, total size 1 kb.

I went to the Showcase, as I do more or less daily, to check out the new blogging talent on the scene. While there, I found out that Mac Diva of BlogCritics did a hatchet job on the Showcase site, thinly disguised as a lukewarm endorsement. Simon does an applause-worthy job of defending both the Showcase and blogging in general against this swath of smarmy condescension, but I want to add my own loving foot-to-gluteous.

The first annoyance is this hoary old canard that blogs don't really count because:

A mere 2% of Adult Internet users maintain Web diaries or Web blogs, according to respondents to this phone survey. In other phone surveys prior to this one, and one more recently fielded in early 2004, we have heard that between 2% and 7% of adult Internet users have created diaries or blogs. In this survey we found that 11% of Internet users have read the blogs or diaries of other Internet users.

So. F******. What?

Is your anal-cranial inversion quotient REALLY so high that you think that popularity is an unerring guide to quality? Statistically speaking, and rounding to three significant digits, 100% of internet users have NEVER heard of Mac Diva. Does that say anything about the quality of Mac Diva's writing, research, or posting? Hardly. It just means she's relatively unknown. Judging quality is the province of people who ARE aware of your existence, NOT of those oblivious.

And what is the non-oblivious Mac Diva's judgement of the blogosphere at large?

As imperfect as the media is, it is leagues ahead of blogs in providing reliable information. Even the best blogs provide very little information, relying on being conduits of opinion, instead.

The big mistake here is assuming that only that which is provided by major media counts as information. I say it depends on what kind of information you're looking for. If you're looking for the doin's & goin's on of elected politicians in Washington DC, then you should probably tune in to CBS. Not many bloggers have those kind of connections. But if you want to know what life is like on a nuclear powered aircraft carrier, or what people are writing on their currency, or how to write a love note that'll make your wife's heart melt, you come to me. I GUARANTEE you Dan Rather doesn't know shit about any of those topics, and even if he did, he sure as hell isn't going to interrupt pimping Clinton's stack of lies to talk about it.

The virtue of the blogosphere is this: EVERYONE is an expert on SOMETHING, although usually it's in a very narrow field. Too narrow for the big boys to bother with. Yet sometimes that narrow expertise is exactly what's needed to make sense of what's going on in the world. The big boys don't have the air time or page space to devote to these things. That's why people turn to blogs. There are millions of tiny news-niches that have been left in vacuum for years. Blogs are filling that vacuum.

Picture the universe of information as a big glass jar. You fill it with "big media marbles" and you swear on your mother's grave that the damn thing's full and there's no room for anything else. Blogs are the sand you pour in to fill the spaces in between.

Take the sand and make glass. Take the glass and make a lens. Look through the lens and see the world better, clearer, brighter than you've ever seen it before.

THAT'S what the blogosphere is.

UPDATE 5-29-04 12:30am: I don't say this often, but check the comments to this post, because some excellent points are being made.

Posted by: Harvey at 08:32 PM | Comments (22) | Add Comment
Post contains 625 words, total size 4 kb.

So, you hate Michael Moore, and you want to write a scathing review of his latest crapumentary, Fulloflies 90210 (or whatever the hell it's called). But it just GALLS you to think that you have to put money in that bloated shitsack's pockets to do it.

I'm here to help.

Go to the theater, buy a ticket for a good movie, and sneak in to Fukentwerp 69 (or whatever the hell it's called).

Problem solved.

(Hat tip to the Bob & Brian show, where I first heard of this miracle cure)

Posted by: Harvey at 10:55 AM | Comments (10) | Add Comment
Post contains 105 words, total size 1 kb.

(Introduction)

I can't wait to be with you, see your smile, look in your eyes, feel your sweet touch, hear your perfect words and kiss your perfect lips.

(CAUTION: Romantics beware - comments may contain naughtiness)

Posted by: Harvey at 10:11 PM | Comments (6) | Add Comment
Post contains 42 words, total size 1 kb.

1 And spank your perfect ass with a riding crop.

Posted by: Harvey at June 27, 2004 10:12 PM (ubhj8)

2 ~~~wha?~~~ oh sorry, must've been thinking about someone else. you were saying, dear?

Posted by: sarahk at June 28, 2004 06:36 AM (HtWwm)

3 No no no.... As my darling husband says: ....Spank your perfect ass with some 30-grit sandpaper and a swim fin. (Who has a riding crop lying around the house?) Heh.

Posted by: Emma at June 28, 2004 12:08 PM (NOZuy)

4 uhh, the bar I frequent on some weekends has women that walk around with riding crops and whips.... Yah know? Oh, and .... I can't wait to be with you, see your hips, stare at your boobs, feel your hot breath, smell your sweet fragrence, and lick your perfect lips. ... damn I'm good.

Posted by: _Jon at June 28, 2004 02:57 PM (ZM3Qb)

5 I lost track at "feel your sweet touch." Right there baby. Don't Stop!

Posted by: Johnny - Oh at June 28, 2004 03:40 PM (Nl2WO)

6 Emma - ROTFLMAO! :-D I don't have a riding crop, but I DO have a saddle. I swear it's only a prop for taking humiliating pictures of horse-dog Jake. ONLY!

Posted by: Harvey at June 28, 2004 11:28 PM (ubhj8)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

(click to enlarge)

[Thanks again I'm a millionaire]

Technically a true statement if you use "Enron accounting".

Posted by: Harvey at 10:10 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 18 words, total size 1 kb.

I have my musical preferences. Certain bands and albums I like. I wish I could find more groups that sound like them. Trouble is, I don't have a lot time to go to the library to check out CD's at random. I also don't have the cash to "take a chance" on an unknown artist. File-swapping services? Forget it. I've got enough spyware & viruses on my computer already.

Thanks to Matty O'Blackfive, though, I've found a way to significantly narrow the search. It's sort of a musical version of Google. You enter in an artists name and it brings up other artists who are similar. I gave it a dry run with a couple of my favorites, and I have to agree that the "similars" it picks out ARE actually similar.

(compressed screenshot - click to enlarge)

So if you're looking to expand your musical horizons, give MusicPlasma a try.

Posted by: Harvey at 10:02 PM | Comments (8) | Add Comment
Post contains 167 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Put in Tom Petty and it gave me the Traveling Wilburys and Roy Orbison as very close so I give it a thumbs up! This visual search engine would rock if put into use on the Blogosphere!

Posted by: Nick Queen at June 28, 2004 01:02 AM (waHYO)

2 Great find. Thanks.

Posted by: Simon at June 28, 2004 04:09 AM (GWTmv)

3 Anyone know if there is anything similar for films? It would be good if you could type in a director/genre or film name and it matched it on similar lines.

Posted by: Alex at June 28, 2004 04:35 AM (a1D32)

4 Great link; thanks for the heads up!

Posted by: pam at June 28, 2004 03:07 PM (l6NIn)

5 About time you noticed that site... I thought everyone already knew about it or I would have blogged it....

Posted by: Madfish Willie at June 28, 2004 10:41 PM (0pRbT)

6 I can just picture the blogosphere version - Type in "Bad Example" and you'd see a tiny circle way off in the corner that everyone has shunned as a pariah for being a degenerate pervert. And if you look closely, you can see a tiny image of me watching pornos :-P MW - that's what I thought when I saw it at Matty's place. But then I realized that I actually have a few (very few) readers that he doesn't, so I posted on it for their sake. You might want to do it for the same reason.

Posted by: Harvey at June 28, 2004 11:21 PM (ubhj8)

7 I don't have any readers... just search engine hits for "hippo dog singing elephant"

Posted by: Madfish Willie at June 29, 2004 12:02 PM (0pRbT)

8 MW - If I were literate, I'D be a reader. As it is, I only go to see if you've posted any dirty pictures. I keep being disappointed.

Posted by: Harvey at June 29, 2004 11:06 PM (ubhj8)

Hide Comments | Add Comment