FITNAFitna is a short movie (about 17 minutes) from the Netherlands that juxtaposes violent verses from the Koran with images of violent actions taken by Muslims, some quite graphic.
Were Islam a decent religion, they'd make their own short propaganda film showing all the good and charitable work that Muslims do, juxtaposed with uplifting verses from the Koran.
1
Take away Fitna's music, and the movie could be interpreted as the Koran's exact prescription for dealing with the West. In fact, one could imagine it was made by the Islamists. The only reason they would want it banned is to keep us in the dark about it. Like don't let the person you're about to kill know you're about to kill them. How long can this idiocy continue?
Posted by: Jimmy at March 30, 2008 03:33 PM (gJFp6)
My family and I are joining in. Whether or not it has any affect on global warming. I am just in love with the idea that millions of people around the world are joining together to do some thing positive for our home, planet earth. It sure beats killing each other in a war.
What else will this person do just because millions of other people do it?
I don't know, but I'm locking the door and loading my Glock, just in case they decide to do it near me.
1
Global warming...Hmmm kinda like the jedi mind trick, only works on the weak minded ahem..now "credits WILL do fine"....sorry "global warming WILL do fine" and yes I DO think I some kinda Jedi waving my hand around like that.
Posted by: blogless brother at March 30, 2008 01:45 AM (G7bNU)
2
OOOOOoo another Spam Monkey...O.K. MR Spam Monkey MEET MR force lighting GGrrrrrr....UNLIMITED POWER..GGGGRRRRRRR!...Is he dead???
No still twitching
GGGRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR.
Posted by: blogless brother at March 31, 2008 01:12 AM (ngVhW)
3
I know - let's promote the notion that if they all go to the cliffs of Dover and throw themselves off - they'll save the earth. Wonder how many would do it.
BTW - in your post about Fitna above (comments closed). Live Leak reposted it after taking it down... at least that's what I saw over at the Puppy Blender's place.
Posted by: Teresa at April 01, 2008 08:11 AM (rVIv9)
2 GIRLS 1 CUP - STRANGE JOURNEY
Funny how you get from here to there sometimes.
Blogless Brother Tom was over visiting, and - being the computer geeks we both are - random chatter was accompanied by random web surfing. That's our equivalent to having a radio on in the background. Well, our radio-equivalent was YouTube, which just happened to feature the words:
"Ooh Girl!" - An Honest R&B Song
over this highly amusing video (which is not appropriate for innocent youth, who probably wouldn't get it anyway):
Checking out related videos by the same artists made me realize that Runawaybox is the future of YouTube sketch comedy. Bookmark them.
Still this realization came with a price.
You see, one of their videos is "The Marty Show - 2 Girls 1 Cup", which is a video of this guy watching a popular internet video that I'd never heard of called "2 Girls 1 Cup". And as soon as Marty started watching, I paused the Marty Show & told Tom words to the effect of "We need to watch this video so we get the joke."
It didn't take much Googling to find the basic description - some weird Brazilian fetishist made a video featuring two lesbians thoroughly enjoying a cup of poo, followed by cheerful exchanges of vomit.
I thought it odd that I'd never heard of this video, because there's apparently a strong cottage industry at YouTube of filming people's reactions to viewing this video.
Naturally we set about to see this festival of wrong for ourselves.
Turned out to be quite a challenge to find.
Most of the popular Google links were to what I'll refer to as "sucker pages", where they talk about the video just so that you'll visit their sites and click their ads. Any video links tend to be mere reaction videos, and completely unhelpful to our quest.
I did, however, find a couple useful links:
CAUTION: Before clicking these links, please understand that you will be viewing girls eating poo and vomit. Which doesn't sound bad when you say it like that, but the reality is... well, let me put it this way - the three most callous, jaded men I know (Graumagus, Contagion, and That 1 Guy), would react to this video by wincing and saying "Damn... that's fucked up". If you know these men, then you know what it would take for them to pass such a judgment. Normal human beings will react with horror, disgust, and possibly regurgitation. Normal human beings should not watch this video. If you DO decide to watch this, do so with the knowledge that you can't UNwatch it, and it WILL leave scars.
The one at this forum features the video, but you have to scroll down to see it. The bad news is that it starts automatically, so scroll down fast so you don't miss any pooey goodness.
Now the reason I'm posting this isn't so that you'll watch the video, or any of the reaction videos (except maybe the Kermit the Frog one), but rather because nothing pisses me off more than having to wade through a bunch of deceptive Google-whoring liars with fake links and duplicitous content to find what I'm looking for. Hopefully this post will keep someone else from having the same problem.
1
A shit and vomit sundae (or smoothie), regurgitated back and forth. Gotta say, I was not aroused. I think that they should have made it "2 girls 1 pitcher", as that "cup" didn't hold much.
From the descriptions, I thought it'd make me sick... especially watching Joe Rogan's reaction. While thoroughly disgusting, it wasn't that bad. Don't get me wrong... it wasn't good, either. Not good at all. I wouldn't click on that link a third time (God only knows why I watched it the second time), and I definitely won't be downloading that shit.
Heheheheh... now that's punny.
BTW. I can so see folks hurling over this. That last shot is a gut roller.
Posted by: That 1 Guy at March 22, 2008 11:21 PM (ATrAd)
Posted by: That 1 Guy at March 22, 2008 11:37 PM (ATrAd)
3
Damn.
I wanna click over and watch it, but dinner is just now ready. I don't want to (a) loose my appetite, or (b) loose my dinner after.
I'll possibly click it way later tonight.
Happy Eater!
Posted by: wRitErsbLock at March 23, 2008 03:05 PM (0Pi1o)
4
See, if you had been over for the New Years party you could have seen it then. This was a topic of discussion that night. That video is wrong on so many levels. I've actively gone out of my way to keep Ktreva from seeing it as I want to preserve her innocence. The fact that I've seen it at least 6 times probably doesn't say much for me. It's not that it does anything for me, I just like showing it to others and watching their reactions.
Posted by: Contagion at March 24, 2008 07:14 AM (Q5WxB)
5
Okay, I clicked it and got 13 seconds into it before stopping.
I don't need to see that. But thanks for giving me the option.
Posted by: wRitErsbLock at March 24, 2008 06:15 PM (0Pi1o)
6
I think I'm proud to say I've finally found a link of Harvey's that I'm just not going to follow it -- and I'm really not going to this time.
Posted by: Ogre at March 28, 2008 01:36 PM (oifEm)
OREOS VS. BREAD
If you leave a package of Oreo cookies sitting out, they will get stale and soft.
If you leave a slice of bread sitting out, it will get stale and hard.
Why?
I would think that both of these baked goods would end up with moisture contents related to the household's internal humidity, and thus end up with similar degrees of pliability.
1
The Staleness Gnomes are whimsical and capricious, and should never be challenged! Their wrath is fearsome and terrible to behold!
If I had to venture a guess, I'd say it has to do with the specific densities of each item causing the discrepancy. Oreo cookies are a denser bread than bread, so, absorbs more water vapor, while bread, being less dense, actually loses moisture. But, that's about two steps below a WAG.
Posted by: the Humble Devildog at March 20, 2008 07:28 PM (TL8Kz)
2
I think it probably has something to do with the amount of fat, specifically saturated fat (which stays liquid at room temperature) in each. With the Oreos, the just get soggy with their fat.
but they are still good.
This is all just a guess.
:-D
Posted by: tommy at March 21, 2008 06:08 AM (Ffmbd)
3
It's the sugar. Sugar is hygroscopic. It absorbs water. Starch (bread) is not. Starch in bread causes it to lose moisture, the sugar in Oreos causes them to absorb moisture.
Posted by: Phelps at March 21, 2008 11:11 AM (F1XeB)
SICK OF IT
Unless someone can point toward some fancy plugin that'll keep me from drowning in spam comments, I swear I'm moving back to Blogger.
Tangentially, do people with Haloscan comments get a lot of spam? Maybe I could just install those into my template & shut down these beshitted native MuNu ones.
1
On all the Haloscan sites I've been on, spam is relatively non-existent. But, I'm not exactly the best source to use for that.
Posted by: the Humble Devildog at March 20, 2008 07:29 PM (TL8Kz)
2
Many are moving off of munu. Some went to meenu, but T1G and Tammi have both moved as has Prochein Amy. VW is looking into it as well. Its the spam and the inability to comment.
3
Try haloscan - I've never seen any spam comments on any sites that use it. It should be easy enough to install I would think. Then you don't have to move everything to another site which is definitely time consuming.
Or you could email Pixy and see if he can move you to minx and import your template stuff. I haven't had any spam since I moved. It's very fast for posting and (even though few people want to comment at my site) it's fast for comments too. If people have had problems, they haven't said anything - perhaps they have had problems and just didn't tell me... that would figure. LOL.
Posted by: Teresa at March 21, 2008 09:17 AM (rVIv9)
4
My blog uses a captcha system, and it's now *very* rare for me to get spam messages... but whether you can add one on to the mu.nu comment system, I have no idea...
Posted by: Shadoglare at March 21, 2008 07:43 PM (kuEiu)
5
No spam in my comments. I reckon it's time to thank you again for installing Haloscan comments for me.
Posted by: Peter at March 22, 2008 12:17 PM (d/RyS)
6
I get *no* spam - never have. It used to make me feel a bit unloved...
I got over it though. ; )
Posted by: Richmond at March 22, 2008 04:48 PM (+M9xQ)
1
I plan to miss this one too - I am glad my girls are older... That makes it easier...
Posted by: Richmond at March 12, 2008 07:16 AM (PT6hV)
2
I think my husband wants to see it.
wasn't it enough that they screwed up the cat in the hat?
Posted by: wRitErsbLock at March 12, 2008 07:55 AM (+MvHD)
3
c'mon gramps, don't be so grouchy. theo geisel would love the nuance bastardizations, don't you think? that man had to do hard drugs.
i have to see it. seuss in my soul, you know? i'm a north going zax, my man, can't help myself. i'll tell you if it sux tho.
Posted by: .supergurl at March 12, 2008 06:31 PM (cWKxt)
Posted by: RedNeck at March 13, 2008 06:31 PM (zVAJL)
5
For what it's worth, Entertainment Weekly magazine gave it a good review. I think just the fact that it's CG and not live-action makes it better than Cat or the Grinch.
BTW, I think one of these spam comments is a Beatles lyric. Hm...
Posted by: Roses at March 15, 2008 08:50 PM (KAu3P)
6
Dude The big guy checking IDs isn't working, you may want to consider turning off the comments, Or see If you can't block the entire domain these ass monkeys are working out of.
Of course I maybe talked Into sitting at the door with my shotgun If your nice to me
Posted by: blogless brother at March 15, 2008 10:04 PM (0A/pP)
1
EXCUSE ME!! If I can get past all this damned spammers....I know! I know!!
Ah Hmmmm.
Maggie Thatcher wears a Purple Pimp Hat for one simple reason.....
because......
She Can.
:-)
Posted by: Tammi at March 10, 2008 08:52 PM (53IQq)
2
Because she's 82 and she doesn't give a damn what anyone thinks!!! Go Maggie!!!
Posted by: Teresa at March 10, 2008 10:02 PM (rVIv9)
3
I'm with Harvey.
The woman simply doesn't know how to dress.
With the purple blouse, she's supposed to wear a RED hat!
Posted by: Roses at March 11, 2008 03:22 PM (jCDHV)
4
All she needs is those dollar sign sun glasses, a ridicoulous looking rhinestone covered pimp cup and one of those gold cane things. And maybe widen up the brim on the hat a bit.
Posted by: ChrisA at March 16, 2008 09:47 AM (TnrKn)
Proof that a song doesn't need to make sense to be popular. Not that Beatles fans need any proof of that *cough*A Day In The Life*cough.
Step one - lyrics
Step two - music
Step three - video
Blogger lets you schedule posts now? Hell, I may have to dump MuNu (yes, I know MuNu has that feature after Pixy sets it up, but he's not taking my calls on the topic).
MMMbop tick a ta ba do ba
dubi da ba do ba
tick a ta ba doo
yeah eh yeah
Here's the horrible thought:
That's what they recorded.
At some point, there was a first draft, and it was so mind-bogglingly horrible that it was rejected in favor of the wretched demon-flatulence listed above because - by comparison - said sickly ear-barf actually sounded GOOD.
Just pray that no copy of that first draft ever falls into the wrong hands, or we're all doomed.
Posted by: That 1 Guy at March 01, 2008 05:59 PM (F8ULw)
2
Oh, for the good old days, eh Harvey? Back when Jeremiah was a bullfrog, was a good friend of mine, never understood a single word he said, but he always drank a mighty fine wine.
Ahhh...
When lyrics made sense!
(FYI: Yes, I am mocking you.)
Posted by: Roses at March 01, 2008 08:00 PM (I/pU7)
3
I'm not sure whether that'd be better or worse than the obama commercials
Posted by: ChrisA at March 02, 2008 12:46 PM (TnrKn)
4
someone left the cake out in the rain. I don't think that I can take it, 'cuz it took so long to bake it, and I'll never have that recipe again.
Posted by: wRitErsbLock at March 02, 2008 05:29 PM (0Pi1o)
5
Roses - as a Blue Oyster Cult fan, I guess I'm just throwing stones from my glass house, huh? :-)
Posted by: Harvey at March 02, 2008 05:54 PM (VSEpa)