December 27, 2004
KING... UM... *QUEEN* OF THE BLOGS RESULTS POSTED
King of the Blogs results are in, and it looks like
Cyn's Sim is now the Queen of the Blogs.
Which means the blogosphere will soon be infested with girl-cooties.
The reviews are here, and, in addition to the fact that this week's contest was actually determined by the reader-poll results, you can also discover such things as:
Songstress7's cowbell fetish rudely breaking through the placid surface of her psyche.
Pietro committing hate speech against Blogger.
Psssst! Pietro! All Blogspot blogs now come with a Google search feature at the very top of the page.
Although AggPro's "black text on dark blue background" makes it easy to miss.
Oh, and the answer to your curiosity is "10".
Posted by: Harvey at
09:34 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 133 words, total size 1 kb.
December 26, 2004
IT DOESN'T HAVE TO BE BORING
Blogson Johnny-Oh of Closet Extremist has
a couple holiday laments, both of which I can fix.
First the lack of a secular winter holiday:
The main thing that I wanna say is (of course) Merry Christmas! (Sure I'm an athiest, but that doesn't mean that I can't use the ages-old expression of well wishes during the Holiday Season. Get off my back already!)
Well, Happy Agnostica:
"An agnostic?" I asked him, "So what's up with that?"
"Belief in ourselves!" he said, "Pure logic and fact!
"But what about us who have no religion?
"Who celebrate science? Don't we get a smidgen?"
"Yes! We'll celebrate science, not some `god' in the sky!
"And declare that Jesus was just a nice guy."
# "The person of the century as declared by Time
"Is a person on SCIENCE- Albert Einstein!"
King Luca continued, "So why not revere
"This new white haired-man at this time each year?
"For Einstein! For Rutherford! For Bohr, Planck and Fermi!
"For Heisenberg, Schrodinger, for Roentgen and Curie!
"For all of those Nukees who've ever known scorn,
"The secular holiday AGNOSTICA is born!"
Second, the blandness of cash as a Christmas gift.
Most times a nice little trinket that goes along with someone's interest's is more appreciated than something as impersonal as cash, but I had to do something.
Actually, if you're going to give cash, it doesn't have to be dull. Liven it up with oddball stuff, like $2 bills, Sacagewea Dollars, Susan B. Anthony dollars, or Kennedy halves. Most banks have some of these laying around gathering dust in their vaults. You just have to ask.
But even if you can't FIND anything exotic, you can always MAKE something...
Money Origami.
After that, just duct tape them inside a paper bag, and you'll have created the bestest gift they ever got.
Posted by: Harvey at
12:46 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 316 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I really could have used that Money Origami link yesterday! That would have been too cool. I guess I'll have to wait until next year to celebrate agnostica as well. I guess it's the thought that counts. :^)
Posted by: Johnny - Oh at December 26, 2004 05:25 PM (FI0J1)
2
Agnostics? I've heard of them, but I'm not sure if I believe they really exist.
Posted by: Jeff at December 26, 2004 07:56 PM (HBm8P)
Posted by: Susie at December 26, 2004 08:53 PM (6GQn7)
4
Ohhh. That is so cool. I use to make cranes when sitting in meetings being bored to death. I would see how small a piece of paper I could use... now if I ever get the chance, I will try it with money!!
Posted by: vw bug at December 27, 2004 07:00 AM (OT9Q1)
5
Oooo. Money Origami. Yessss, precioussss.
Posted by: Linus at December 27, 2004 10:51 AM (Bf+TD)
6
[throws tomato at Jeff]
Susie, don't encourage him :-P
Posted by: Harvey at December 27, 2004 06:28 PM (ubhj8)
7
If someone wishes to give me a gift, and finds cash to be boring, writing a non-bouncing check with a lot of zeros after a whole number and before the decimal is always fresh and exciting.
Posted by: Graumagus at December 27, 2004 06:43 PM (8pWhv)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
December 25, 2004
TODAY'S LOVE NOTE
(
Introduction)
The daylight faded into darkness and still he sat, waiting patiently for her to wake. He studied the line of her body as she lay sleeping, the curve of her hip and shoulder, the soft rounding of her back. She was such a tiny thing, just a little bit of flesh and bone beneath the coverings, the smallest spark of life. He marveled at the texture of her skin, at the coloring, the absence of flaws. She might have been molded by some great artist whose reflection and skill had created a once-and-only masterpiece...
(CAUTION: Romantics beware - comments may contain naughtiness)
Posted by: Harvey at
11:13 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 109 words, total size 1 kb.
1
... she rolled over, and - seeing her now, in sobriety's cold light - he fled screaming into the darkness...
Posted by: Harvey at December 25, 2004 11:13 PM (ubhj8)
2
So you're saying Helen Thomas has a nice rear end?
Posted by: Earl at December 25, 2004 11:35 PM (6krEN)
3
Upon waking, she saw him in her room.
Terrified, she screamed, grabbed the .45 from the nightstand and put 5 holes in the creepy bastard.
Posted by: _Jon at December 26, 2004 07:22 PM (RZ4Hy)
4
Earl - on a scale of 1 to 10, where 10 is Jennifer Lopez and 1 is Kirstie Alley, Helen is probably about a 1.1, so... relatively speaking... yes.
Posted by: Harvey at December 27, 2004 06:26 PM (ubhj8)
5
Now I know for sure there's no God.
Posted by: Earl at December 27, 2004 06:47 PM (ywZa8)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
KING OF THE BLOGS: JUDGMENT DAY 2
One man sits on the throne, and a mixed double of challengers eye it hungrily.
Could this finally be the week when a warrior hottie claims SOLE possession of The Big Chair?
Let's find out.
THE CHALLENGE QUESTION:
If you are crowned King, what King from history or popular culture would you emulate and why?
Warren of View From The Pew
GOOD POINTS: Suave segue neatly disguises the fact that this is a mandatory assignment and NOT a typical, voluntary post. Future competitors should learn from the master and avoid bland, factual introductions. MAKE UP ANOTHER REASON FOR YOUR POST. It's much more entertaining that way.
BAD POINTS: "immitate his reign"... "surrounds himelf"... "ANd this way"... didn't I warn you about stealing other people's typo schtick last week? You keep this up, and I'll be forced to vote on considering discussing a resolution - and maybe even eventually PASSING it!
SCORE: 5
T.A.P of The Aggressive Progressive
GOOD POINTS: Great off-the-wall angle on the King question. Bonus for pushing my nostalgia button by mentioning Quisp.
BAD POINTS: The Pat Robertson reference seemed a little forced & awkward. Probably could've been improved by referencing an intolerant bigot who held ACTUAL political power. Hitler, Stalin, or even the Pope maybe.
SCORE: 4
Cyn of Cyn's Sim
GOOD POINTS: Not one, but TWO pictures of big-eyed, long-haired brunettes. Either she's been reading my blog, or she's a lucky guesser. Either way - BONUS! Other great things - the mental image of the Blog War Dance just made me giggle; I liked the over-the-edge choice of RuPaul for "Queen"; finally, she gives explicit credit to BOTH of her image sources. VERY classy.
BAD POINTS: None visible
SCORE: 5
SUBMITTED ENTRY:
View From The Pew
GOOD POINTS: Extremely well-constructed piece on how Christians ought to be taking their message to those who need it most, whether they want to or not. I enjoyed how the tagline was woven throughout the essay to give it unity.
BAD POINTS: Perpetuates unfair stereotypes against Samarians as smelly sinners. VERY insensitive.
SCORE: 5
The Aggressive Progressive
GOOD POINTS: One of the most self-absorbed posts I've ever read - ME! ME! ME! Narcissism is a necessary trait in an effective monarch, so bonus on that.
BAD POINTS: Squanders bonus by failing to give link to the post he's complaining about. If you don't want to drive traffic to someone you don't like that's fine, but in that case, at least have the courtesy to quote the post extensively so that your readers know what you're talking about. A Fisking may have been more appropriate here.
SCORE: 3.5
Cyn's Sim
GOOD POINTS: The phrase "from the dirty but not stinky pile" just rocks. Also cool is the fact that - even wearing her dirty-but-not-stinkies, and having a head full of sleep and/or oil, she STILL can't look as skank as Britney.
BAD POINTS: She made me look at skanky ol' Britney. I'm sending her the bill for my retinal reconstructive surgery.
SCORE: 5
WHOLE BLOG REVIEW - TECHNICAL MERIT AND PERSONALITY:
Here are some technical things I like to see on a blog:
King of the Blogs javascript thingy in the sidebar
Comments enabled
Permalinks working
E-mail contact info available
Blogger's name/pseudonym prominently displayed
Site search feature enabled
Link to an "About Me" post on the sidebar
Blogger's gender is easily discernable
Blogroll
Readable font style & size
Readable color scheme (for example, NOT bright red type on bright green
background)
Divisions between posts clearly marked
Paragraphing in entries (NOT just writing one fat block of text)
Aside from the tech stuff, I also like to see a blogger's personality shining through, to
remind us of the person behind the words.
With that in mind...
View From The Pew:
GOOD POINTS: Nothing but. All his techs are in order, plus he actually took my corrective advice from last week. Color me flattered.
BAD POINTS: One more suggestion, but I won't subtract for it. The link to the "About Me" post should probably go right above the contact e-mail address. Currently, it's right under the Creative Commons License stuff. The CCL is one of those things that just shouts "IGNORE ME!", and it's zone of invisibility may tend to obscure the "About Me" link with it's psychological halo.
SCORE: 5
The Aggressive Progressive:
GOOD POINTS: Excellent non-annoying use of the color yellow in the sidebar - normally to be avoided at all costs, but T.A.P. makes it work. I also really like this template's use of thin lines to keep the title, post body, and footer-information separated. Easy on the eyes, easy to use.
BAD POINTS: A little skimpy with the contact info - this is nominally a group blog, yet only one of the listed authors has a contact e-mail in their profile. I guess it's a good thing that T.A.P. is pretty much the only one posting. Another irritation is that gender is not obvious with either T.A.P. or The Almighty. I'm a little uncomfortable writing about a blogger if I don't know which pronoun to use. I'm going with "male" though, because "mike" is part of T.A.P's e-mail address.
SCORE: 3.5
Cyn's Sim
GOOD POINTS: Technically flawless. She's got everything I like to see in a blog. Bonus for the quite fetching picture of herself displayed prominently above the fold. Bonus bonus for the KotB haiku. Other bonus for having blogged since pre-9/11. Talk about longevity! WOW! I hope *I* live that long!
BAD POINTS: Just a few minor things that raised an eyebrow. First... what is Cyn short for? Cynamyn? Cynara? Cyndee? Cyndi? Cyndy? Cyneria? Cynethia? Cynithia? Cynna? Cynth? Cynthea? Cynthia? Cynthiana? Cynthiann? Cynthie? Cynthria? Cynthy? Cynthya? Cyntreia?
...just curious.
Second, Cyn's blogroll is listed by the blogger's first name instead of the blog's name. There's nothing inherently wrong with that - her blog, her call - and it's functional if you're just surfing off it. However, Cyn, you might consider that your blogroll also serves as advertising for the people on it, and listing their blog names is more likely to get them random surfer traffic than listing their real names. Just something to think about.
Finally, the post title font is the same size as the post text font. For asthetic purposes, you might consider making the title font a few points larger to give it a little more emphasis - more of a "headline" feel.
SCORE: 4.5
FINAL TALLY:
View From The Pew: 15
The Aggressive Progressive: 11
Cyn's Sim: 14.5
Posted by: Harvey at
04:26 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 1100 words, total size 7 kb.
December 24, 2004
FOOTBALL QUESTION
Beloved Wife asked me this, and it had me scratching my head.
Are there any black punters or kickers in the NFL?
Seems to me it's the exclusive purview of stubby little white boys.
Posted by: Harvey at
11:46 PM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 38 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I don't think there are any right now, unless you count Kordell Stewart as one. He has at least one punt attempt this year.
Last one I remember was a
GREAT punter named Reggie Roby. And he wasn't stubby. He was around 6' 5". Played most of his career with the 'Fins. Last I remember of him, he was playing for the 'Skins in mid-90's.
Posted by: That 1 Guy at December 25, 2004 12:44 AM (FoXGF)
2
Damn Harvey, that's a good one. I can't think of any at this point, but now I got something to chew on.
Oh, T1G - good one on Kordell. Ha!
Posted by: Tammi at December 25, 2004 09:47 AM (QSZLe)
3
Of course I knew the answer to that question... I just wanted to see how long you would be sitting around scratching your ass before someone showed up to enlighten you....
Posted by: Madfish Willie at December 25, 2004 08:14 PM (HL8Ry)
4
Rodney Williams - a Ga Tech graduate, punted in the NFL for a few seasons a year or so ago.
Posted by: TBFlowers at December 25, 2004 09:40 PM (6XIpi)
5
I asked my bro who is the pro football stat king and he said not right now, but then proceeded to tell me about Reggie Roby. He does that Fantasy Football thing like T1G.
Posted by: Boudicca at December 25, 2004 10:04 PM (ogaj7)
6
Yeah, Reggie Roby was a very good punter - though lacked the longevity of other punters I think.
Rodney Williams had great leg, but wasn't consistent enough for the pros. We loved him in college.
Posted by: TBFlowers at December 26, 2004 08:40 AM (6XIpi)
7
Before Regy Roby, Greg Coleman punted for the Vikings. At the time (78-87) he was the best directional punter in the league.
Posted by: Randy at December 26, 2004 04:50 PM (XwrIa)
8
Reggie Roby passed away today at age 43. Cause of death is unknown. Sad.
Posted by: BigTfromDC at February 22, 2005 04:19 PM (n00hF)
Posted by: Harvey at February 22, 2005 10:09 PM (ubhj8)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
GREASE SEQUEL
So says
the rumor from Kevin at Wizbang, and - in the comments - people are stumbling all over themselves with enthusiasm.
Me, I never understood the attraction.
Of Grease
Of John
Of Olivia
Of 50's music.
And I remember the 80's - where this sequel might be set.
Worst decade ever. Bad music, bad hairstyles, bad clothing.
I'm already having nightmares about this movie.
Posted by: Harvey at
07:30 AM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 69 words, total size 1 kb.
1
There was a Grease sequel, it was set in the 60's and starred that guy from TJ Hooker, the T-Birds were bikers and this Austrialian (I think it was Sandys cousin) came to Rydel and wanted to hook up with the TJ Hooker guys girlfriend but he was a nerd but he decided to become a biker to win her over and eventually he did and became friends with the TJ Hooker guy.
Posted by: Machelle at December 24, 2004 08:36 AM (FIdNW)
2
Oh and Grease is to females what any Rodney Dangerfield movie is to males.
I've got the Record, Tape, CD, and Video. I just have to go get it on DVD now.
Posted by: Machelle at December 24, 2004 08:38 AM (FIdNW)
3
Could be worse. Could be a disco movie, set in the seventies...
Posted by: GEBIV at December 24, 2004 09:51 AM (ZzJMr)
4
The 80's rocked. Of course I graduated HS in 92, so I was pretty young in the 80's. But that was my childhood.
Gebiv, A disco movie could be cool. Especially if it's done like Boogie Nights... Anything the see Heather Graham Nekked!
Posted by: contagion at December 24, 2004 10:25 AM (iZg6D)
5
It was NOT the worst decade. In 1980 I was at Ole Miss. We wore pink izod oxford shirts and straight leg levis with penny loafers. VERY PREPPY. I Did roll my long hair pretty curly, but it looked good! No disco, just Animal House music. It was awesome! so don't be dissing the 80's!!
Merry Christmas btw!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Rightwingsparkle at December 25, 2004 12:35 PM (qiDkw)
6
Sorry, but I just received a copy of James Lileks' book "Interior Desecrations."
This is documentary evidence that the 1970s were the
worst decade ever.
Anything that produced Elton John, Jimmy Carter, the Bee Gees,
and Bell Bottoms as a fashion trend is not doing much right.
The Eighties at least had Reagan, New Wave, Punk, and
The Empire Strikes Back.
Posted by: J. Fielek at December 25, 2004 10:10 PM (N96af)
7
Maybe it has something to do with my upper class redneck upbringing - but I like 80's hair on women. Something about the long haired feathered look.
And in Grease, how can chicks in tight leather be a bad thing? Maybe the title was meant to imply the amount of lube needed for wardrobe?
Posted by: TBFlowers at December 26, 2004 08:43 AM (6XIpi)
8
I'm with J. Fielek. The 70s were the worst. Everyone looked sloppy. Blech.
Posted by: Bou at December 27, 2004 04:56 PM (ogaj7)
9
Ok, I admit it. I'm just bitter about the 80's because, when my hair gets more than a couple inches long, it starts to kink up a little, and it absolutely will NOT feather.
Made me an outcast, it did.
That, and I rejected the assertion that synthesizers and electric drums were musical instruments.
Posted by: Harvey at December 27, 2004 06:19 PM (ubhj8)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
FUN FACTS ABOUT NEW YEAR'S
FUN FACTS ABOUT NEW YEARS
My latest guest post is up at IMAO.
Go. Be first.
Posted by: Harvey at
07:22 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 26 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Merry Christmas, Harvey!
Posted by: Ogre at December 24, 2004 08:21 AM (ltMXY)
2
My favorite "fact":
The traditional American way to celebrate New Year's is to wear funny hats and make obnoxious noises while milling about aimlessly. In France this is called "battle".
Posted by: Susie at December 25, 2004 09:14 AM (s+NPR)
3
Susie - Heh. Mine too :-)
Posted by: Harvey at December 27, 2004 06:13 PM (ubhj8)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
HOLY CRAP! LION TOURS! MY BLOGDAUGHTER IS FAMOUS!
Machelle of Quality Weenie
got quoted extensively in USA Today.
Excuse me while I take a moment to smirk at the memory of her reluctance to start blogging.
[moment]
Ok, now go congratulate her.
By the way, my favorite part would be this:
She is frustrated by experts who say over-the-counter products provide as much pain relief.
"Every time I hear that, I want to go hit that person," [Machelle] says. "They have never been in the kind of pain I'm in. Taking aspirin is like popping M&Ms."
Posted by: Harvey at
12:10 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 102 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I'm now glad that I didn't say that is gets my panties in a bunch when people say that.
Posted by: Machelle at December 24, 2004 08:39 AM (FIdNW)
2
She grew up so fast.....*sniff*
Posted by: Tammi at December 24, 2004 04:28 PM (QSZLe)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
December 23, 2004
TODAY'S LOVE NOTE
(
Introduction)
Emptiness is filled with richness and reward
Promises are kept as into forever we voyage
What was once storm-tossed now is serene
Love shared awakens new beginnings
Forever doesn't seem long enough
Vows are made, yearnings are fulfilled
Passion and tenderness envelops us
We feel the warmth of souls united
Forever doesn't seem long enough
(CAUTION: Romantics beware - comments may contain naughtiness)
Posted by: Harvey at
11:21 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 70 words, total size 1 kb.
...AND THUS, THE TITLE OF THIS BLOG
I've gotten into the Christmas spirit again.
Welllll... it's SORTA like the Christmas spirit, except slightly more evil and depraved.
By which I mean I've debased yet another fine Christmas carol in the extended entry - "Here Comes Santa Claus".
The pure of heart will probably want to pretend this one never happened.
Either way, here's a midi so you can sing along (courtesy of HamieNet.com)
(Oh, and good luck finding pictures for THIS one, Ogre)
more...
Posted by: Harvey at
10:25 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 291 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Holiday Season getting to you, Harv?
Posted by: Susie at December 24, 2004 06:54 AM (s+NPR)
2
Not the season, just the music. Somewhere around the 50th time I hear a song, alternative lyrics start suggesting themselves. It's a gift :-)
Posted by: Harvey at December 24, 2004 07:08 AM (ubhj8)
3
Uh...well... I've got the napalm and strafing covered...
Posted by: Ogre at December 24, 2004 07:58 AM (ltMXY)
4
I am so glad that I am at home on dial-up and it is impossible to download and actually listen to that stuff.
*going and putting in another Christmas CD*
Posted by: Machelle at December 24, 2004 08:41 AM (FIdNW)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
WHILE FRANK'S AWAY, THE GUESTS WILL PLAY
Frank J. of IMAO is away on holiday hiatus.
Guest poster Harvey of Bad Example, is NOT.
Fun Facts About Love is now up.
Go. Be first.
Posted by: Harvey at
07:41 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 41 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Geez. I win on both counts.
Posted by: indorphin at December 23, 2004 07:49 AM (/9CoY)
2
Just when you think it is safe to get back in the water... wait, that was JAWS.
Harvey, you are as funny as my Uncle Felix.
Posted by: KEEME at December 23, 2004 11:58 AM (vDQAX)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
SOON TO BE VENGEFULLY DE-LINKED
I've been reading Boots & Sabers for... well... damn near EVER. I have a lot of love & respect for Owen, and he's a daily read.
Well, he WAS.
All that's over now.
Some crimes are just TOO heinous to be forgiven.
After what he did to his wife Wendy...
My GOD Owen! Do your marriage vows mean NOTHING to you? Did you even THINK about what effect this might have on your CHILDREN?
Shameful. Simply shameful.
Don't know how he can look at himself in the mirror to shave in the morning.
Posted by: Harvey at
12:01 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 103 words, total size 1 kb.
1
That was horrible, I may have nitemares about that.
If my husband ever, ever did that I would rip the family jewels from his body and throw them away.
Posted by: Machelle at December 23, 2004 08:42 AM (74P7F)
2
As I was using the side mirror of my car to shave this morning (after having a very cold night), I paused and reflected on the error of my ways.
I feel shame.
I repent.
Posted by: Owen at December 23, 2004 08:54 AM (aje5y)
3
Hmmm... maybe we can work
something out...
[makes "bribe me" hand gesture]
Posted by: Harvey at December 23, 2004 09:59 AM (tJfh1)
4
Owen, I'm sorry to have to tell you this but what you have done carries the rarely used FEDERAL death penalty reserved for the crime you've confessed to, also:
The serving of unfrosted pop-tarts at a social gathering.
AND
The possession of fat free Twinkies with the intent to serve a minor.
The last being the worst offence
Posted by: Blogless brother at December 23, 2004 10:00 PM (6cyEp)
5
There are hundreds - nay - THOUSANDS of people wandering through our streets who have attempted to pass off a fat free Twinkie as edible. There could be one walking past your house right now. Yet they walk free.
Is it justice that I should be punished when these fiends walk free?
I think not.
Posted by: Owen at December 23, 2004 10:50 PM (z21FK)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
December 22, 2004
TODAY'S LOVE NOTE
(
Introduction)
I PROMISE YOU
To be with you each night
watching it slip into each new day
the sun brings the promise
of my devotion in every way.
To watch the years
blend into years
being the keeper of your dreams
the conqueror of your fears.
To have you feel the passion
only hearts in love can feel
from this moment on
proving my love is real.
I will give my love freely
in everything we do
spending the rest of my lifetime
whispering words of love to you
No more broken hearts
or unhappy memories
never any fallen tears
where smiles should be...
(CAUTION: Romantics beware - comments may contain naughtiness)
Posted by: Harvey at
11:03 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 118 words, total size 1 kb.
1
...I love you, Playstation 2...
Posted by: Harvey at December 22, 2004 11:04 PM (ubhj8)
Posted by: sarahk at December 23, 2004 09:39 AM (BSmn7)
3
... and your even cuter sister, Xbox...
Posted by: GEBIV at December 23, 2004 03:14 PM (3D2az)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
ON EVOLUTION
I've seen a
couple of
posts on the topic of evolution recently, both of which led to... enthusiastic... discussion in the comments of said posts.
Which leads me ask to the following question:
Has anyone actually READ Darwin's "On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection"?
I mean, it's available, unabridged, on the web for free, so cost can't be a factor.
The obvious stumbling block is that it's written in that prepositional-phrase-laden, nigh-impenetrable prose so common to 19th century authors, but it's certainly no more challenging than wading through the Bible.
I bogged down around Chapter 9, myself, but have good intentions about finishing it eventually, and carry an e-book version around on my PDA for which I paid a mere couple bucks or so.
What I *did* read was quite persuasive. Darwin supports his theory by examining mind-bogglingly huge stacks of observed natural phenomena. What I liked about it is that he cites examples from biologists who spent decades in their field of study. These aren't offhanded remarks from laymen, these are the condensed records from people who know whereof they speak.
Darwin does not (so far as I've read), postulate that evolution is the means by which life arose from non-life. He merely proposes evolution as the mechanism by which new species branch from a common ancestor. Speculation on the origin of life itself is not dealt with, nor do I wish to deal with it here.
All I'm saying is that those who wish to denigrate Darwin's theory should invest some time to learn exactly what it is they're dismissing.
Posted by: Harvey at
10:53 PM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 270 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Okay, I'm a practicing Catholic - been Christian my whole life, no need to be born again... I have always believed that creationism and evolution can and must coexist. The bible is a work of man/men inspired by God. The bible was written as a means for God to speak to the world. It had to be written in terms that the general public could understand - the world being created in many millenia would be too mind-boggling for the average man to fathom (they thought Earth was flat and the Sun and the rest of the heavens revolved around it, right?) To humans of these times everything was pretty miraculous and believing that "poof" we sprung from the ground was easier than believing that it took several million years to get the recipe for humans, etc. just right. The thing that gets most creationists hung up is the "God created man in his own image" thing. First of all what exactly does that mean and second of all what does God look like if that's IS what it means? Maybe God is more "apelike looking" or maybe it just took a few thousand or million years for humans to get "done" kind of like the baking process. When's the last time any of these creationist saw God face to face? Most of our ideas of what God and Jesus look like came from the times of the middle ages, the renaissance and the like, when artists started depicting religious writings through illustrations and paintings.
I'm not a literalist when it comes to religion. I know that I don't know everything and that the priests don't know everything and the writers of the Bible didn't know everything. You have to have faith, but you also have to look at the hard facts before your eyes. Sure, there are miraculous things that happen all the time, but most things are confined to the laws of physics - which like all other things were created by our higher power, the greatest physicist of them all. Right?
And that's all I have to say about that...
Merry Christmas, Harvey!
Posted by: Momotrips at December 22, 2004 11:30 PM (IlAxX)
2
Very well stated, Momo.
And Merry Christmas to you, too :-)
Posted by: Harvey at December 23, 2004 09:41 AM (tJfh1)
3
First, thanks, Harvey, for the link to the Origin of Species, I'm reading through it right now. I'm a born again Christian and have been very interested in creation. The English translations of the Bible we have today don't perfectly reflect the Hebrew text. The word used in the Tora that we read as day in Genesis actually has a double meaning in Hebrew. It can mean age or day, and is used for both in Genesis. Also, the Bible states the earth is a sphere. I believe the passage is in Job. The ancient Greeks also were aware of this. It wasn't until the middle and dark ages that people lost that knowlege and started believing the Earth was flat. The Catholic church making that doctrine didn't help much in recovering the knowlege.
Creation as described in Genesis fits hand in hand with how current science believes the Universe was created. As Momo stated, He is the greatest physicist; He created physics. However, the more and more I'm looking into evolution theory as it stands today, it has some HUGE gapping holes. Carbon dating and it's partners for dating older things is notoriously inaccurate. Chips of bone from the same fossil have been sent to several universities and the results usually have a window of error around 200 million years. The scientists tend to pick the number that best fits with when they believe the fossil existed. There's also a severe lack of transitory species. They should be the norm, and the final species abnormal, yet that is not the case.
There are more examples, but this gives you an idea if you weren't aware. I'm not saying the world must have been created in 6 days because of these holes, only that evolution is by no means completely filled in with the answers. It is, however, the best explanation we have so far. Before people were aware of nuclear reactions, they believed, and had worked out pretty solidly, that the sun was actually molten iron generating static electricity through it's movements which would create heat and light. (Outline of Science, 1927 Chapter 9)
Merry Christmas, Harvey and Momo and anyone else who suffered through this incredibly long comment!
Posted by: Junglejake at December 23, 2004 12:27 PM (GeNwL)
4
Nobody's saying that Darwin had it mostly wrong; what many people refer to as 'evolution' and what Darwin observed on the earth and recorded in his books is quite possible - and observable - on earth. In fact, most creationists with at least half of a scientific background believe in intra-species adaptation, or what is called "Microevolution". On a small scale, it's what happens when bacteria mutate and become more dangerous to humans. On a larger scale, it's responsible for different types of birds, even different forms of the same bird.
However, what I strongly disbelieve and what a scientist has yet to prove without drawing from wild assumptions and creative liberty, is that one species could evolve from another.
Posted by: Pietro at December 23, 2004 12:35 PM (DaRhZ)
5
Junglejake - I'd be interested in more information about the inaccuracy of radioisotope dating. I'm aware that the processes used have their limitations but the 200-million-year variance sounds a bit extreme
Anyway, here's a link to some radioisotope dating information:
http://www.tim-thompson.com/radiometric.html
A quick googling has a lot of Christian "young-earth" sites on top. Explanations by people who actually DO such dating tend to be further down, but the above link is a good start. Unfortunately, I couldn't find any completely "straight" information sites near the top. They seem to be specifically a part of one side or the other of the "young-earth" argument, so there's a feeling of agenda defense in some of these.
By the way, Darwin DOES address the "lack of transitory species" problem in fairly extensive detail (see Chapters 6 & 9)
Pietro - Well, species-to-species evolution is what Darwin's book is all about. You might give it a try.
The thing about his work is that he's familiar with thousands and thousands of different kinds of plants and animals, not the mere dozens or hundreds that you or I know, so he might be able to fill in those gaps that you currently dismiss as wild assumptions.
But it's your time, so I'll leave it up to you as to whether you should spend it reading that particular book
Posted by: Harvey at December 23, 2004 06:18 PM (ubhj8)
6
I'm a Christian (practicing) and a man of science (Tech University). But:
If the human body is intelligent design then why do we have an air intake portal that is so easily flooded and lead to asphyxiation.(sp)
And even worse, why (particularly in females) was a sewage outlet put so close to a recreation area?
Posted by: tbflowers at December 23, 2004 09:38 PM (6XIpi)
7
Oh, and it's been ages, but I have read Darwin's work.
I think the biggest thing 'most folks' have a problem with is that Darwin does not beleive in evolution being a constantly improving process. Evolution does NOT necessarily mean an improvement. If a being evolved consistently better, one could argue that evolution is truly guided.
But if I remember correctly, Darwin explains that evolution is nothing more than random mutations, without a purpose. It is up to nature (the environment/habitat) to decide if the evolution is suitable enough (or not a hinderance) for survival.
Darwin, our Copernicus, was a genious. Doesn't mean he was flawless, just way ahead of his time.
Posted by: TBFlowers at December 23, 2004 10:08 PM (6XIpi)
8
TB - First, since you're going that direction, the answer would be that he must work for the Department of Celestial Planning - just another bureaucrat, packing a lunch & bustin' his hump every day. And what about the nose? Did he REALLY think it was a good idea to put a nasty, wet, dripping thing like that upside down over your mouth?
Speaking of ahead of his time, one of the most interesting things about his work for me is that he did it all without any knowledge of genes or DNA. All he knew of were mysterious, unexplained "tendencies" for offspring to be similar (although not exactly the same as) their parents, with no specific cause or consistency.
Or as Richard Dawkins puts it:
"the non-random survival of randomly varying hereditary elements"
Posted by: Harvey at December 24, 2004 07:04 AM (ubhj8)
9
he did it all without any knowledge of genes or DNA.
EXACTLY - a visionary/trailblazer
Posted by: TBFlowers at December 24, 2004 03:00 PM (6XIpi)
10
First, Harvey you're doing a great job at making Frank J look bad on IMAO! Way to go! I just checked these comments about 10 minutes ago, and will get you the info, but I think I have it at home. It was, obviously, one of those things with an agenda (debunking evolution), but I checked the data online and it was valid. The specific incident had to do with an early human (pre-Sapien(SP)). The guy dug him up, suspected when he was alive, then sent a sample to Cambridge which came out with an outrageous number. This caused him to send 4 samples to 4 other colleges and another to Cambridge, and they all came out vastly different. He took the one that was closest to his predicted date and threw out the rest. I'll find the source and get you the name of the guy who was dug up (like Lucy, this fellah got a new name, too).
For some fantastic information on this subject coming from educated people for and against evolution, go to www.talkorigins.org Very cool site!
Keep up the funny, Harvey!
(Also, if you're interested in an interesting, but very long, discussion on this, check out this link:
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread47371/pg1
Yeah, it's a conspiracy website with a bunch of wackos, but I liked going there and talking God and politics with those heathen liberals =D
Posted by: Junglejake at December 28, 2004 03:12 PM (GeNwL)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
ON GIFT WRAPPING
Blogdaughter Tammi of Road Warrior Survival
has problems doing it right.
I can do it, but I don't enjoy it. Seems like a pointless waste of time, since it's just going to get shredded anyway.
However, I found a way to get around half of the misery.
I call it "Guy Wrapping".
Very simple. If you're giving a present to an adult male, just take a brown paper grocery bag, stuff the present inside, fold the top down, then go around it a couple times with duct tape.
Technically, it meets the definition of "gift wrapping", since there's a gift inside and the outer wrapper completely conceals the contents.
Guys will smile.
Women will roll their eyes.
A good time will be had by all.
Posted by: Harvey at
10:21 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 131 words, total size 1 kb.
1
i like using the funny papers and duct tape. Well, really, the funy papers are just to keep the duct tape from sticking to the object as i wrap it COMPLETELY with the tape. I probably burn through a roll in all, but the look of sheer consternation and absolute hatred i get when i give the presents always makes up for it in spades. And i wonder why i never get invited to weddings, they should know that i'd cover MY wrapping with a nice outer wraping (just cause i'm an asshole too,) i mean we wouldn't want the wedding to seem churlish now, would we?
:-D
Posted by: tommy at December 22, 2004 10:27 PM (y0fBO)
2
Newspapers, brown bags, I use them all. The best thing is that I did it once out of necessity, and now it's expected of me!
Posted by: That 1 Guy at December 23, 2004 05:25 AM (rSOWL)
3
I wasn't paying attention to the title and at first I thought this post was a bout sex. Which started to make me wonder what the hell was going on.
As for gift wrapping, Carton sealing tape, recycled mylar computer parts bags and colored shrink wrap. It makes for present opening fun to watch people suffer through an hour of unwrapping to see their $5 gag gift.
Posted by: contagion at December 23, 2004 06:55 AM (Q5WxB)
4
You people work too hard at it. Did you think Wal-Mart gave you those snazzy white plastic bags for no reason whatsoever? Just pull up the handles, tie them in a knot, and the beer, err...gift, is wrapped!
Posted by: Ogre at December 23, 2004 09:27 AM (ltMXY)
5
Ogre - but duct tape makes it manly :-)
Posted by: Harvey at December 23, 2004 09:30 AM (tJfh1)
6
Well, if it's a special gift, you can go all the way and duct tape it -- but not every gift!
Posted by: Ogre at December 23, 2004 10:12 AM (ltMXY)
7
When running out of double sided tape (trying for the seamless approach) the Mrs. has in the past used rubber cement...
I have often used brown paper bags...
And the funny papers are definitely fair game. In moments of desperation, I've cannibalized printer paper. I guess you could print off festive decorations to give it some color.
Posted by: tbflowers at December 24, 2004 03:18 PM (6XIpi)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
NOT A LOVE NOTE
For those poor guys who've been burned by the fairer sex,
this little video may offer some comfort.
(hat tip to Physics Geek)
Posted by: Harvey at
10:13 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 31 words, total size 1 kb.
1
That kind of reminds me of the De Beers commercial where the couple is in some European town square and the guy yells out that he loves this woman. She gets all embarassed and tries to shut him up, so he gives her a big ass diamond ring and then she hugs him and very quietly announces she loves this man. Everytime I see that commercial I get this moral to the story:
Women don't want guys that actually love them and will tell they whole world they do, They really want a guy to buy them expensive items so the woman will secretly tell the guy she loves him, but keeping her options open in case a richer guy is watching.
My wife does not like that interpretation on the commercial.
Posted by: contagion at December 23, 2004 07:01 AM (Q5WxB)
2
Just add the word "some" in front of that, and your description is spot on.
I married one of the few women in the world who HATES jewelry. Outside of her wedding ring, she wears no spanglies or danglies, except for MAYBE some holiday earrings if she's going to a party.
Easy on the wallet, but it makes her tougher to shop for. I actually have to THINK about what gift I should get for her :-/
Posted by: Harvey at December 23, 2004 09:51 AM (tJfh1)
3
Now THAT was FUNNY! Thanks for the link to the video. Someone sure seemed a little bitter...
Posted by: Junglejake at December 23, 2004 05:09 PM (GeNwL)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
FRANKLY, *ALL* CHRISTMAS MUSIC SOUNDS LIKE THIS TO ME
Didja ever notice that when some pop artist re-makes a classic Christmas song, they feel compelled to inject it with an inhuman degree of passion in order to "make it their own"? With absolutely zero regard for tradition, much less rhythm or melody?
I notice it 8 hours a day, as I've mentioned before.
Well, I say that if you're going to sound like an American Idol "into the pit of death with you" reject, you might as well give it your all.
As in this version of Oh, Holy Night.
The challenge being to make it through the whole thing with a straight face.
Before you ask, that's not me. It was passed along to me by one of my blogless (and non-annoying) co-workers.
It's technically safe for work, but you'll probably lose your Christmassy-spirited friends if you play it at any significant volume.
Posted by: Harvey at
09:37 PM
| Comments (11)
| Add Comment
Post contains 163 words, total size 1 kb.
1
That version brought tears to my eye.
sniff...sniff.. wipes tear from lmao
oh man.... sorry Lord. Thank God He has a sense of humor.
Posted by: Joshua at December 22, 2004 10:46 PM (IvQZU)
2
In the immortal words of Bill Walton:
"That was horrrrrible!"
Thanks. I think.
Posted by: Randy at December 23, 2004 01:52 AM (XwrIa)
3
Still beats the Beach Boys doing The Man With All The Toys :-P
Posted by: Harvey at December 23, 2004 09:34 AM (tJfh1)
4
At least the Beach Boys were original.
Posted by: GEBIV at December 23, 2004 03:24 PM (3D2az)
5
Except that they still had that horridly-harmonizing Beach Boys sound.
Fingernails on a chalkboard to me.
Posted by: Harvey at December 23, 2004 06:20 PM (ubhj8)
6
2:00 plus minutes, I've finally lost it. Must be what I sounded like last week in the pew. Well, I'm at 3:00 and I must say that I'm definitely better than him. LOL
You're going straight to hell for that one harv.
Posted by: TBFlowers at December 23, 2004 10:23 PM (6XIpi)
7
Okay... The high not at 2:13 drove me away. That was un effing listenable.
And yes, it does have some resemblance to all the popstar remakes.
Posted by: Ted at December 24, 2004 09:26 AM (EZmj/)
8
The traditional spelling of high not is "high note".
Posted by: Ted at December 24, 2004 09:27 AM (EZmj/)
9
rofl
i gave up 55 seconds into that warbling.
Posted by: fluke_boy at December 24, 2004 11:14 AM (oiUOy)
10
I only lasted 22 seconds before I could tell that you need a record contract. So I have something to boycott.
Posted by: Tyler at December 24, 2004 10:22 PM (C1iU8)
11
WOW, I made it to the end. When will your tryouts for American Idol be? Hopefully, this will not be another William Hung?! This is at least Ruben quality.
/goes off to silence the echoes in my mind.
Posted by: Tyler at December 24, 2004 10:41 PM (C1iU8)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
GIFTS FOR THE TROOPS
(
A PRECISION GUIDED HUMOR ASSIGNMENT)
It's almost Christmas, and it's time to start thinking of all the lonely soldiers stuck in the sandbox for the holidays. I'm thinking some of the following items might cheer them up:
Non-goat-related porn
Toilet paper featuring Michael Moore's face.
Bottles of French wine - with the wine poured out and replaced with something less turpentiney
More armor. Maybe we could cut up one of John Kerry's SUV's
Sorry, one of his family's SUV's.
Nike Air Terr-O-Stomper brand combat boots.
Hardee's Monster Thickburger - hold the camel.
Desert camo foam dome.
Decorative brass balls for their Humvees.
A toilet that flushes with sand instead of water.
Reindeer horns for their tanks & APC's
12,000 Whos who will SING! SING! SING! SING! until the insurgents are driven quite thoroughly mad.
Oh, and of course, this little reminder of just what exactly they're fighting for:
(click to enlarge)
(hat tip to I Hate My Cubicle!!! for the pic)
Merry Christmas, boys.
SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS!
UPDATE: One serious gift for the troops, courtesy of Matty O'Blackfive:
Kevlar blankets.
Go find out how you can help give the gift of bullet-resistance.
If you're undecided, think of it this way:
If the soldier were here, you'd buy him a drink without thinking twice.
Take the drink money & buy him some Kevlar now, so you CAN buy him that drink later.
Posted by: Harvey at
07:24 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 239 words, total size 2 kb.
1
So what you're saying is that our troops are fighting for Sexy Lingerie?
No Blood For Sexy Lingerie.
Um. Yeah. That's right. Make her take it off!!
Posted by: rightwingduck at December 22, 2004 07:40 PM (1AWMf)
2
Doncha wish MORE women exercised their freedom of speech like that? ;-)
Posted by: Harvey at December 22, 2004 07:48 PM (ubhj8)
3
If used properly, she could be a great weapon for us in Iraq.
Posted by: Earl at December 22, 2004 08:19 PM (ywZa8)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
92kb generated in CPU 0.0387, elapsed 0.1353 seconds.
86 queries taking 0.1178 seconds, 312 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.