March 26, 2006
BEST D&D CARTOON EVER
I took a tip from bloggrandson Neonangel of
Lyrical Coma, and checked out "The Order of the Stick", a thrice-weekly serial web comic.
Now, I was not an obsessive gamer in high school, but the rest of my friends from chess club were, and I went on a handful of campaigns. Enough to know what "roll for initiative" means, anyway.
So if you've even a passing knowledge of D&D, I think you'll find it amusing.
I'll give you 3 places to choose from for your first visit:
Comic #1 (it's very nearly at #300 now) - Get in on the ground floor and read them in order.
Comic #143 - A typical instance of the humor - the illustrations are of the player characters inside their quest, while the dialogue is pretty much what you'd hear from the players as they sit in the basement drinking Mountain Dew & eating Cheetos. This tickles me, for some reason.
Comic #136 - The Weapons Shop sketch - an homage to Monty Python (you KNEW there would be one in there somewhere, right?).
Anyway, I now return you to your regularly scheduled World of Warcraft session.
Posted by: Harvey at
09:36 AM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 201 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Unless you are on one of the WOW servers that is having connectivity issues this week.....
Posted by: _Jon at March 26, 2006 11:04 AM (/R7YK)
Posted by: Shadoglare at March 26, 2006 04:01 PM (2I4qH)
Posted by: Graumagus at March 26, 2006 06:32 PM (lhYVx)
4
Oh yeah, those are classic!
Posted by: Ogre at March 26, 2006 08:00 PM (pKmGZ)
5
Yeah, Knights of the Dinner Table is a great comic too. The downtime with Order of the Stick isn't quite as bad though, and I love the power of instant gratification. All hail the internet!
Posted by: neonangel at March 26, 2006 10:11 PM (sr2l7)
6
Not bad, but I agree with previous posters that Knights of the Dinner table is probably even better, and online somewhere...
BTW, are you going to Gen Con, Harv?
Posted by: at March 28, 2006 09:12 AM (SAreY)
7
silly me, I forgot to put my name on that last post.
Posted by: Corey at March 28, 2006 09:13 AM (SAreY)
8
Roll for initiative! HA! You were a RPGer? I mostly just read the books and stirred my imagination with that stuff. Never really got a chance to play it much, short of the meager PC offerings.
Posted by: GaMongrel at March 30, 2006 06:51 PM (tYXgL)
9
GA - My FRIENDS were RPG'ers. At least the nerdy ones were. I wasn't nearly as hardcore as they, but we sat together at lunch every day, so I heard a lot of campaign stories.
I think I actually played maybe 5 times in my life.
Posted by: Harvey at March 30, 2006 07:12 PM (L7a63)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 25, 2006
CTHULHU IN A BUSINESS SUIT
(A Filthy Lie)
I always suspected Evil Glenn was just too evil to be human, but in today's User Friendly comic strip, I finally have proof.
Sure, they don't specifically mention his name, but who else would a c-list blogger send an e-mail to?
Posted by: Harvey at
10:36 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 54 words, total size 1 kb.
March 24, 2006
TODAY'S LOVE NOTE
(
Introduction)
I love you more now than when you began to read this sentence.
(CAUTION: Romantics beware - comments may contain naughtiness)
[Like the Love Notes? Get the e-book]
Posted by: Harvey at
09:23 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 28 words, total size 1 kb.
TODAY'S GRAFFITI CURRENCY
(
Introduction)
(click to enlarge)
[(Rubber stamp: Where is John Croll)]
One of hundreds of Ayn Rand's "near misses" as she struggled to perfect the opening line of "Atlas Shrugged".
Posted by: Harvey at
08:43 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 29 words, total size 1 kb.
THE CURSE OF YOUR NAME
Alexa of NY Hotties [
NC17] brings up
an interesting topic:
X and I have been dating casually for a while now. Unfortunately, my attempt at distraction didnÂ’t work. He soon began to sing:
“Well I’m on the Downeaster Alexa
And IÂ’m cruising through la la la la
I have charted la la la la la la—”
Okay. ItÂ’s bad enough sharing a name with a mediocre Billy Joel song. What sucks even more is no one actually knows the words to said mediocre song past the title line.
Me, I'm lucky. No songs about Harvey.
But people DO mention Harvey the Rabbit.
And Paul Harvey.
And the drink Harvey Wallbanger (had one once - didn't like it).
So all in all, not TOO terribly bad.
How about YOU?
Posted by: Harvey at
08:42 AM
| Comments (22)
| Add Comment
Post contains 137 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I don't know any Ogre songs. No one really talks about Ogres much, I'm not exactly sure why...
Posted by: Ogre at March 24, 2006 09:18 AM (/k+l4)
2
Unless its Cannibal Corpses I know of no BloodSpite songs either.
However as far as my real name if I hear one more really bad rendition of Steve Azar I'll puke
Posted by: BloodSpite at March 24, 2006 09:28 AM (ZTGJT)
3
BS - Your real name is Thunderbird? :-)
http://www.cduniverse.com/productinfo.asp?pid=6373191&style=music&cart=321908253&BAB=M
Posted by: Harvey at March 24, 2006 09:39 AM (L7a63)
4
I am cursed with that which I was named for. Those Debbie Reynolds movies - Tammy and the.....
And there's that song "Tammy's in Love". If you only knew how many times I've had that sung to me............
Posted by: Tammi at March 24, 2006 10:45 AM (lfQya)
5
.. don't know any 'Eric' songs either.... which kinda sucks...
Posted by: Eric at March 24, 2006 10:47 AM (r5XsL)
6
I get "Susie Q" mostly. There's also the occasional "Wake up Little Susie" and the infrequent "If you knew Susie." Alexa's lucky!
Posted by: Susie at March 24, 2006 10:51 AM (a0oF7)
7
The only thing I get is the "Mother Teresa" line... no songs though - guess I should be thankful for small favors.
Posted by: Teresa at March 24, 2006 10:53 AM (FZwDL)
8
Eric, there is a Monty Python song called "Eric the Half-A-Bee". That should satisfy :-P
Posted by: Alex at March 24, 2006 11:02 AM (vQk49)
9
My last name is pronounced Cleaver, my mom's name is June. Go ahead, have a field day!
Posted by: Tina at March 24, 2006 11:45 AM (gV3tY)
10
My Great Grandmother was a Nixon supporting Republican, my grandfather, her son-in-law was a dyed in the wool Democrat(the old timey ones that used to really care about people, like Zell Millar). Anyway when my mother decided to name me Patrica, my great grandmother opened her big mouth and said "Let's call her Tricia, after Richard Nixon's daughter"
I was promptly dubbed PATTY. This being the cruelest name in the universe, has not only insulting variations of the word "patty" ie, hamburger patty, fatty patty, patty cake and peppermint patty, but also has a Country and Western song which refrains with "Yippee I-A, COW PATTY!!!" which my evil redneck stepfather sang to me mercilessly during my teen years.
I hate rednecks to this day...and I hate the name Patty.
Posted by: shimauma at March 24, 2006 12:17 PM (oH+XM)
11
I've got the "I'm just a Bill... on capitol hill.." song from Schoolhouse Rock...
Posted by: Graumagus at March 24, 2006 12:20 PM (lhYVx)
12
There are no songs about Oddybobos but . . . my alter ego, has a song about gettin hitched! And Ricky Nelson sings it in one of my favorite John Wayne movies!
Posted by: Oddybobo at March 24, 2006 12:39 PM (6Gm0j)
13
Not a whole lot of songs but I had my own cross to bear. Bein' robbed to pay Paul was just the beginning.
Posted by: Peter at March 24, 2006 05:30 PM (y847y)
14
Peter - I'm sure you also had pretty much the same problems as my brother Richard... AND the Vice President :-)
Posted by: Harvey at March 24, 2006 07:25 PM (L7a63)
15
.. thanks, Alex.. heh... I had forgotten about that one!...
Posted by: Eric at March 25, 2006 09:59 AM (r5XsL)
16
Two Monster Hits:
"James (Hold the Ladder Steady)" -- Sue Thompson.
"Go Jimmy Go" -- Jimmy Clanton (The "I Saw Mommy Kissing Santa Claus" guy)
Posted by: Jim - PRS at March 26, 2006 01:11 AM (njBz/)
17
Try having to deal with "Johnny Angel"....
Posted by: _Jon at March 26, 2006 08:24 AM (/R7YK)
18
No songs about Boudicca that I know of; however, my alter ego has one. I got serenaded in a bar by a couple Naval Aviators, once to the song with my name. They were very very drunk and very very loud.. Ahhh, good times.
Posted by: Bou at March 26, 2006 07:08 PM (iHxT3)
19
What about "Harvey the Wonder Hamster"?
Posted by: Contagion at March 27, 2006 06:15 PM (e8b4J)
20
Contagion - yeah, a little of that, too :-)
Posted by: Harvey at March 27, 2006 08:38 PM (L7a63)
21
Ya, I'm named after the Beatles song and the only line anybody knows is:
Mechelle my belle
and they sing that one line over and over and over again
annoying
Posted by: Quality Weenie at March 28, 2006 11:12 AM (BksWB)
22
Luckily no songs about Irish...but lots of talk about Irish potatoes, Irish Spring (still hate that soap), and so forth.
Posted by: Irish at March 29, 2006 01:16 AM (CUOtZ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
MAYBE I'M UNDERREACTING
So a guy
disciplined his 6-year old twin boys with shock collars, and got felony child abuse charges.
I've never trained dogs, so I don't know for sure, but are these things REALLY that much worse than a spanking?
And can we get these put on our congress-critters so that we can discourage them from voting for tax increases?
Posted by: Harvey at
08:16 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 65 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I picture the Simpsons episode here with Dr. Marvin Monroe...
Posted by: Ogre at March 24, 2006 09:10 AM (/k+l4)
2
My son suggested using shock collars on unruly children just the other night. He doesn't see anything wrong with it.
Posted by: Sticks at March 25, 2006 06:26 AM (s75Uw)
3
Hey, when my hubby and I heard this on the news, we looked at each other and said, "Great idea!". We have three dogs and used the collar on one of them who insisted on digging under the fence. The collars don't hurt, in fact they have a sound 'signal' that you can use and never use the 'shock' option. They work great and I've seen some kids I would LOVE to put one on. ha
Well, NOT REALLY. The father should never have actually used the collar. But haven't we all wanted to strangle our kids at one time or the other? These days things are so politically correct you can't even swat them on the rear end without having children's services come investigate.
And then there are kids like Nixmary Brown in NYC who was abused and tortured all her life until she was murdered. Go figure.
Posted by: Debbie at March 26, 2006 08:21 AM (N+CIp)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
If Democrats Ran Iraq
(
A Precision Guided Humor Assignment cross-posted from
IMAO)
The new Iraqi Parliament that was elected last December has finally been sworn in, but - due to an egregious mix-up at the ballot box - it turned out that all those elected were actually American Democrats.
Vowing to "do for Iraq what Bushitler won't let us do for America", the new Parliament promised to do the following during its first 100 days:
* Outlaw use of the word "terrorist" - replace it with "person of murder".
* No more death penalty. Except for those who refer to a person of murder as a "terrorist"
* Also outlawed will be the phrase "camel jockey", unless it's used at an actual camel race.
* Or by a rap artist.
* It will be illegal to bow toward Mecca at a public school.
* Having a non-denominational "moment of bending" isn't acceptable either.
* No one will be allowed to draw cartoons of Jesus, Buddha, or Moses. However, the Iraqi government WILL fund artworks such as the urine-soaked holy book, "Whiz Koran".
* No cartoons of Cindy Sheehan, either, because her son died for George Bush's sins.
* BUUUUUUUUUUUSH! *shakes fist at sky*
* Floor sweeping will be forbidden in all bars and restaurants, due to the hazards of "secondhand dirt".
* Meanwhile, the tax on brooms will be raised another 50 cents.
* No one will be allowed to own a gun except for police and persons of murder.
* Camel spiders will now be considered an endangered species, and no oil drilling will be allowed in their habitats.
* Unless the oil is being sold to France, Germany, Russia, or China.
* All camels will be required to get an average of 28 miles per gallon of water.
* 38 for the economy 1-hump models
* Witnesses in court trials have to swear to tell the truth while placing their hand on a copy of "Heather Has Two Mommies".
* All of Saddam's old presidential Palaces will be re-named "The Robert C. Byrd Memorial Palace", followed by a Roman numeral.
* And stop nagging Senator Byrd to apologize for his Klan membership! You people are like a pitbull on a mailman's leg with that!
* All sand dunes will be made wheelchair accessible.
* The new Iraqi flag will be an upside down American flag with a picture of Michael Moore's butt on it.
* Women will have equal rights. To apply for these rights, they should send a resume to intern@cigarsinparliament.com.
Frankly, *I'd* be ok with all of these, as long as they make "
Democracy! Whiskey! Sexy!" the new Iraqi National anthem. (
explanatory reference)
Posted by: Harvey at
07:32 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 451 words, total size 3 kb.
March 23, 2006
IT'S A GIRL!
Bloggranddaughter Rave of
Quid Nunc just popped out a brand new baby blogdaughter.
And - believe it or not - it's NOT a relative!
The Bad Example Family gene pool is actually getting some new DNA!
So let's wave a little pink rattle to distract Hippie of Bohemian Rhapsody while we peek at her site:
Traditional sucky first post - Skipped... she goes right for the "
howdy do".
Moving right along, and changing gears with a ragged grinding of mental metal - Wal-Mart lesbian midgets.
No, I'm NOT Google-baiting, that's actually the subject of her post.
Anyway, Hippie, you can pick up a Bad Example Family logo from
this post, and you may, if you wish, blogroll the rest of the Bad Example Family using the
handy blogrolling javascript, although neither is a requirement.
Membership in the Bad Example Clan is also an option, if you're so inclined to jump through the requisite hoops, but is not mandatory.
Meanwhile you can look forward - with either anticipation or dread - to regular visits and comments from me.
Welcome home.
Posted by: Harvey at
02:17 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 185 words, total size 1 kb.
March 22, 2006
MEN IN A NUTSHELL
Richmond of One For the Road says that to understand men, all you need to do is understand
the 7 questions that drive their lives:
1. Am I hungry?
2. Am I horny?
3. Do I have to pee?
4. Is the game on?
5. Will this get me laid?
6. Am I sleepy?
7. Will this make me money?
Can't really argue with this list. And the number 8 for married guys rounds it out exquisitely:
8. Is my wife gonna yell at me if I.....?
However, I think she may be slightly off on answering this particular question:
"Why don't men see things that need to be picked up?"
The truth is, every person - men AND women - have a certain tolerance for chaos & disorder in their living environment. A certain amount of "scattered objects and dust-bunnies" above which the irresistable desire to restore order kicks in. And the level is different for everyone.
So, in ANY given couple, someone will crack under the stress of needing to clean before the other person. Usually it's the woman.
However, when I got married, Beloved Wife had a higher tolerance for chaos than I did, and I could never figure out how SHE could manage to "not see things that needed to be picked up".
Which left me with three courses of action:
1) Change her
2) Clean up after her
3) Adopt her level of chaos tolerance
I chose option 3, and we've lived happily ever after, even if there ARE a few things that need putting away.
How YOU folks choose to solve the "chaos gap", I leave to your own discretion.
Posted by: Harvey at
03:33 PM
| Comments (11)
| Add Comment
Post contains 284 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Our choas gap is huge
I'm a neat freak.
My BetterHalf however is a self admitted slob.
I absolutely positively refuse to go to option 3.
Especially not with 2 kids.
So about once a week I actually get to snap the whip a bit and get her to help me out.
The rest of the week I assume the household cleaning duties. All I ask of her in that time is fold the laundry and empty the dishwasher. I'll do everything else
Posted by: BloodSpite at March 22, 2006 05:12 PM (ZTGJT)
2
And I like Bloodspite have come to terms with the the fact that "nobody cares but me" anyway... Crack the whip? Yes I do, occasionally.
I definitely wish others cared too though, sometimes....
Posted by: Richmond at March 22, 2006 08:47 PM (e8QFP)
3
And those who remain happily married almost never choose option #1...
Congrats on recognizing this, Harv, as it's a key to a happy relationship.
Posted by: Ogre at March 23, 2006 06:22 AM (/k+l4)
4
Heh, yeah Ogre, like many women can be changed in a marriage anyway.
That's like teaching a cat how to fetch.
Posted by: silentwarrior at March 23, 2006 07:22 AM (x2iVE)
5
My husband and I have different tolerances for chaos in different areas. If something is bugging me then I clean it up. If something is bugging him then he cleans it up. Seems to have worked so far. *grin*
Posted by: Teresa at March 23, 2006 10:35 AM (FZwDL)
6
Man, that's what I did wrong! *Takes notes* I'll have to try this if I ever find myself in that situation again.
Posted by: Sticks at March 23, 2006 05:03 PM (tC2QQ)
7
Harv, you are the gayest straight boy I know.
I wish I could honestly say I didn't understand what you mean, but as my SO has a significantly greater chaos tolerance than I , I do know exactly know what you mean. I just lowered my tolerance. Count on you to take the high road.
Posted by: og at March 23, 2006 05:04 PM (N95T8)
8
And I mean that in the nicest possible way.
Posted by: og at March 23, 2006 05:05 PM (N95T8)
9
I'm married to Monk, as in the character from the TV show. And I have clutter issues. I'm not slovenly by any stretch, but I'm not a neat freak either. He has adapted to me, trying to be OK with the chaos that can be my life and I know what really pushes his buttons and try to make sure I don't bug the ever living crap out of him.
We can't change each other, but we've met somewhere in the middle. And when he finally gets all OCD on me, I just stay out of his way and know he'll work through it.
Posted by: Bou at March 23, 2006 07:59 PM (iHxT3)
10
Og - Hey! I'm NOT gay!
Although I *do* love the feel of TNT's muscular arms holding me close.
Oh, and show tunes. LOVE those show tunes! :-)
Posted by: Harvey at March 24, 2006 07:21 AM (L7a63)
11
Harvey's Gay! Harvey's Gay!
But hey, you can't be fired from any job now...
Posted by: Ogre at March 24, 2006 09:15 AM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 21, 2006
TODAY'S LOVE NOTE
(
Introduction)
[Found at and modified from Aussie Wife]
In the morning's clear light
I study the face I know so well
I am filled with a boundless love
as my gaze travels over familiar curves and contours
I see the peacefulness that deep sleep brings
when the essence of the person hides within
then she awakes and the face is transformed
a sleepy smile and a request for morning loving
the weekend has begun
(CAUTION: Romantics beware - comments may contain naughtiness)
[Like the Love Notes? Get the e-book]
Posted by: Harvey at
04:26 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 81 words, total size 1 kb.
TODAY'S GRAFFITI CURRENCY
(
Introduction)
(click to enlarge)
[Fran lost a bet]
Well... sort of.
Posted by: Harvey at
04:23 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 13 words, total size 1 kb.
FOR STRAIGHT WHITE ERIC
Who
mourns the passing of the well-dressed man.
How to tie a tie.
I did this for 7 years working for the bank, yet always had issues getting the finished project to sit with the tip perfectly atop the belt buckle, as it ought to be. Each tie I own has its own idiosyncrasies of fabric thickness and width, which makes attaining the "just right" length more of an art than a science.
Plus the Windsor is an unforgiving knot. Virtually no leeway for adjusting the finished product. If you screw it up, you have to start over.
Still, it's a talent worth learning.
Now if only I could figure out how to shine my shoes instead of just making them a vaguely-glossy black.
Posted by: Harvey at
10:26 AM
| Comments (12)
| Add Comment
Post contains 132 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Damn Swabbies don't even know how to shine their own shoes...
Posted by: Ogre at March 21, 2006 10:59 AM (/k+l4)
2
.. thanks, Harv... it's a lost art it seems...
Posted by: Eric at March 21, 2006 11:05 AM (r5XsL)
3
I confess to preferring the 4 in hand, something about the asymmetrical thing I really like. I can shine my shoes, but don't really. When I was on the Air Force demo thing, one of the crewchiefs finally got disgusted with me and took my boots away for the weekend and shined them his own self.
I don't know what he did, but it's been ten years and they still shine.
Posted by: tommy at March 21, 2006 01:59 PM (dTj9I)
4
Me? I really like ties... I think they look nice. Finished. Professional.
I especially like lumberjacks wearing ties (with white shirts and jeans... and work boots...) but that's a story for another day....
Posted by: Richmond at March 21, 2006 02:47 PM (e8QFP)
5
Ogre - I know *how*, but I just can't get that mirrored look. I took advice all through my Navy years - lots of polish, a little polish, melt the polish with a lighter, polish with water, polish dry & sprinkle water, use spit not water - tried 'em all, along with dozens of variations of brushes & polishing cloths.
I could pass an inspection just fine, but there were always plenty of guys with better looking shoes :-/
Posted by: Harvey at March 21, 2006 04:03 PM (L7a63)
6
That awesome shine comes from using rubbing alcohol with the melted polish....
Posted by: caltechgirl at March 21, 2006 05:19 PM (jOkK0)
7
I wear a windsor knotted tie daily for work, it really irritates me when people wear ties with a different knot in it. To the point that I've been known to change sales people because the way they tied their tie annoyed me.
Posted by: contagion at March 21, 2006 06:52 PM (e8b4J)
8
Real ties are dangerous, someone grabs your tie they can drag you around like your on a leash.
Clip ons come off in there hand and the knot is PERFECT every day, and while he's looking at the tie in his hand you can put a steeltoe boot in his nuts.
But thats just me.
Posted by: blogless brother at March 21, 2006 09:50 PM (KD5nc)
9
I used to have to wear a tie every day. Thank God those days are long gone. I still can tie a tie without a mirror. But I guess I was always doing a half-Windsor knot.
Posted by: Jerry at March 21, 2006 11:32 PM (BARWS)
10
Now this is one topic I can agree with! I'm always lamenting the fact that men today just have no idea how to present themselves.
Hmmm...I look down and I see what I have on right now:
Tailored black slacks
Tailored white poly-cotton dress shirt (sleeves halfway rolled up)
Button-up black cotton sweater vest
Black tie in a full windsor
Gold tie tack
Shirt garters holding the shirt tight to my black dress socks
Spit-shined black leather shoes
All I need now is for my new fedora to come in and I'm all set!
Should we men, as a collective, forget to look and act the part of masters of ourselves and our world...then we indeed deserve to be treated as the whipped, sloppy, uncaring men we appear to be. Sad part is that it's all a matter of personal choice. Choose to be sloppy, or choose to shine. Ah hell...maybe I've just been born 50 years too late...
Posted by: silentwarrior at March 22, 2006 07:15 AM (x2iVE)
11
I don't do the Windsor. For some reason, that know doesn't cotton to me very much. However, I've been tying the reversed tie knot for a while. You start with the tie upside down(seam out) and then proceed from there. Makes a nice, tidy knot.
Posted by: physics geek at March 23, 2006 03:05 PM (Xvrs7)
12
I have a firm belief that a well shined pair of shoes requires two things...
A big city shoeshiner slinging a dingy grey rag in the...
"Shave and a haircut, two bits" rhythm.
Hope this helps!
Oh, and of course the environmentally unfriendly substance these big city shoe shiners employ. Which anyone who's anyone knows is rendered from particularly smelly bums.
Posted by: Jake Jacobsen at March 23, 2006 11:14 PM (X2ChO)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 20, 2006
TODAY'S LOVE NOTE
(
Introduction)
Had I no eyes but ears, my ears would love
That inward beauty and invisible;
Or were I deaf, thy outward parts would move
Each part in me that were but sensible:
Though neither eyes nor ears, to hear nor see,
And nothing but the very smell were left me,
Yet should I be in love by touching thee.
Say, that the sense of feeling were bereft me,
And that I could not see, nor hear, nor touch,
Yet would my love to thee be still as much;
(CAUTION: Romantics beware - comments may contain naughtiness)
[Like the Love Notes? Get the e-book]
Posted by: Harvey at
04:37 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 103 words, total size 1 kb.
TODAY'S GRAFFITI CURRENCY
(
Introduction)
(click to enlarge)
[(Paper quarter)]
From "Counterfeiting For Dummies", p. 137:
"When counterfeiting coinage, resist the temptation to hand-draw, and keep in mind that paper is NOT an appropriate medium for this endeavor."
Posted by: Harvey at
04:35 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 38 words, total size 1 kb.
1
"...paper is NOT an appropriate medium for this endeavor."
And if
it were, I'd be rich!
Posted by: beej at March 20, 2006 05:12 PM (7YknZ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
THIS ONE JUST MAKES MY BRAIN EXPLODE
Found this at
American Digest
(click to enlarge)
Square A and Square B are the same color.
I saw the animated video which proves it. It didn't convince me.
I read the explanation. It didn't convince me.
I downloaded the pic, opened it up in MS Paint, cut out a chunk of square B and slid it up to square A...
After about 5 minutes of sliding that little section back & forth, I was finally convinced.
Try it yourself.
Posted by: Harvey at
04:31 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 94 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Similar to "What color is a red box in a dark room". It's black, or colorless, because color is based on the reflection of light. Bizarre, colors and the reflection of light, or lack of it...and shadows...those
damn shadows.
Posted by: David Drake at March 20, 2006 06:33 PM (yB5+1)
2
"don't believe anything you hear and only half of what you see"
It fooled me. Even after your testimony, I had to put it in photoshop and compare the color attributes.
Posted by: Sticks at March 20, 2006 07:05 PM (tC2QQ)
3
I noticed it right after you pointed it out.
Of course, I used to do a lot of painting miniatures, so, using tricks of shading and light aren't unusual to me.
Posted by: the Humble Devildog at March 20, 2006 09:13 PM (TIYju)
4
I didn't do any computer tricks. I just stared at the square in the shadow. Stare at it long enough and the shadow becomes more pronounced and, I'll be damned, they are the same color.
Of course, now I can't focus my farookin' eyes.
Posted by: Jim - PRS at March 20, 2006 09:24 PM (njBz/)
5
I argued with a guy about that for what seemed like forever. Even when I saw the evidence, I accused him of trickery! Yes, trickery!
Who are you gonna believe, me or your lyin eyes?
Posted by: Miss Cellania at March 21, 2006 08:17 AM (X7oZk)
6
Fairly straightforward. Looking at the two shadows on the "dark" square (right of the B square) and you can see how much effect the shadow has on the colour there. The same effect is therefore applied to square B. All those years of DPaint and Photoshop counted for something then :/
Posted by: Alex at March 21, 2006 10:34 AM (vQk49)
7
I completely thought it was crap until I put it in Paint, too. Well, I'll be damned.
Posted by: Tuning Spork at March 22, 2006 11:07 PM (i0pwT)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
MEN SUCK - TELL US SOMETHING WE *HAVEN'T* HEARD
Bloggranddaughter Rave of Quid Nunc is
throwing a little gas on the fire:
"Why is it (and I may be skewed a bit in my thinking as I am female) that most men do not remember 'things' and most women do?
I'm not talking about just 'remembering' them, but actually 'remembering to do them'.
There's 3 reasons men forget to do stuff
1) We actually forgot.
2) We haven't yet found an uninterrupted 2-hour block of time to get a good start on a major project, but hope to this weekend. Meanwhile, "I forgot" provokes a better response from most females than "quit nagging".
3) Don't really wanna do this project because it's a dumb idea, and we tried to tell you that in the first place, but you wouldn't listen. Now we're just hoping you'll forget about it eventually.
Hope that explains things.
Meanwhile, does anyone recognize that movie she mentioned where the new wife uses a dog-training manual to adjust her husband's behavior?
Posted by: Harvey at
04:27 PM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 183 words, total size 1 kb.
1
My mother must have seen the movie because she once fried up a Gainesburger dogfood pattie, stuck in on a hamburger bun and fed it to my drunk stepfather.
Posted by: Sticks at March 20, 2006 07:11 PM (tC2QQ)
2
There are a couple more reasons, like
4) Sit com dads are funny on TV. But, the characters are written by people who have no respect for their dads. Stop treating your husband like he's a sit com dad. Do it long enough, and he'll take the hint, and start behaving that way.
5) Women don't realize that men aren't much more complicated than puppies. For the most part, we only do what the women in our lives let us get away with.
Mull on those two for a bit, and we'll all start seeing progress on this front.
Posted by: the Humble Devildog at March 20, 2006 09:20 PM (TIYju)
3
Get back to me on this once women remember to put gas in the car.
Posted by: Jim - PRS at March 20, 2006 09:26 PM (njBz/)
4
I do all maintenance on my own car, fill my own car with gas etc. I never ask my husband to do 2 hour projects. I'll hire it out before I ask. Or do it myself. My husband can come and go as he pleases... I'm not his Mom.
Posted by: Bou at March 20, 2006 09:30 PM (iHxT3)
5
Bou - that's why all the guys love you :-)
Posted by: Harvey at March 20, 2006 09:45 PM (L7a63)
6
We actually do remember quite a lot of stuff. Many men can tell you important things like Don Mattingly's Batting Average in his rookie year (.343) and Dan Marino's career total yards (61,361) -- we just don't remember all the other, less important crap...
Posted by: Ogre at March 21, 2006 08:03 AM (/k+l4)
7
That's what I'm getting at....
Ogre hit it on the head, so to speak.
I don't think men really have THAT BAD of a memory. They just choose to remember other things- like batting averages.
Trust me- my husband can remember ANYTHING about a computer, network, router, switch, hub, etc. and you only have to tell him once- because he can spit it all back at you six months from now without missing a word.
So then- why would he ask me the same question three times in one day?
Is it that he forgets what the answer is?
Or is it that he doesn't deem the answer important enough to remember?
(yeah yeah yeah, call me Devil's Advocate...)
Posted by: Rave at March 21, 2006 02:52 PM (Fir0Z)
8
I think it is partly a priority thing and partly a time based thing. I tend to get asked to do things and generally it is "do this now please" - but that is inferred rather than being explicitly stated. My man brain reads the request as "this needs doing but sometime in the future".
If Sally says "can you do this now?" then I understand where the priority lies. At the risk of sounding sexist I will analyise the request and assign it a priority and, if needs be, explain why I am not doing it "right now" (DIY projects being a good example). Sometimes that 5 minute job (or so she thinks) will actually lead to more time spent and so we put it off until we have the requisite amount of time available.
Posted by: Alex at March 22, 2006 02:36 AM (vQk49)
9
I heard a 'phrase' a long time ago, and it kind of stuck in my head. It's a good way for me to gage 'am I being anal about this?'
What's the phrase?
'Unhappiness occurs when your expectations do not meet reality.'
So- every time I start to get upset over something, I think, "Is *my* expectation of this really cause for anger?" Because the answer is usually 'no.'
I chalk it up to a difference in expectations/perceptions/reality and move on.
Posted by: Rave at March 23, 2006 08:53 AM (Fir0Z)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
82kb generated in CPU 0.0297, elapsed 0.1348 seconds.
83 queries taking 0.1191 seconds, 309 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.