January 24, 2006
YUP, THAT'S ABOUT ALL OF 'EM
I've been saying for years that every car built since about 1990 or so looks exactly like every other car built since about 1990 or so.
Let's face it, there are only so many shapes that will make a car aerodynamic enough to meet the ever-sillier government CAFE standards. And all of these shapes are round.
Angles? Corners? Pointy things? Too much drag. If a car doesn't look like an egg, it can't be mass-produced in America. Sturdy metal bumpers that don't explode into plastic shreds at the slightest tap? Too heavy. You get a bump in a parking lot, you're out $500+ to make your uni-colored car look pretty again.
However, after seeing this new toy pointed out by Rat of I Hate My Cubicle, I have to admit that I was wrong to say that there's only one kind of car any more.
Apparently there are 6.
But I still say that within those six basic forms - A Ford is a Chrysler is a GM is a Honda.
Posted by: Harvey at
04:17 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 183 words, total size 1 kb.
1
In Frank Miller's... I think it was The Hard Goodbye. I dunno, whichever one had Marv trying to avenge Goldie, Marv says something along the lines of, "I thought they stopped making decent cars in the fifties."
Though, the best part was something like, "Acording to his keys the father drove a Mercedes... Or at least what they're passing off as a Mercedes these days. To me all moderm cars look like electric razors."
Posted by: Joey at January 24, 2006 07:16 PM (JXgKx)
2
HEY, stop bad mouthing cars theres nothing wrong with my egg shaped electric razor Ford.
Posted by: blogless brother at January 25, 2006 02:50 AM (7KtNA)
3
Some of us do like those rounded off cars!
And anyway the trend is going back to those ugly square boxed vehicles.
blech
Posted by: Machelle at January 25, 2006 07:30 AM (ZAyoW)
4
Tailfins! I want my freakin' tailfins back! :-)
Seriously though, I *do* miss big, shiny, chrome grills & bumpers. They added character.
Posted by: Harvey at January 25, 2006 08:41 AM (ubhj8)
5
Harv-Let us not forget, my 77' T-bird the mere sight of which caused people to hit there brakes rather than risk pulling out in front of me, that car just screamed I"M UNINSURED GO AHEAD, PULL OUT IN FRONT OF ME I DARE YA!
Posted by: blogless brother at January 26, 2006 02:44 AM (CJyEf)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
HOW ABOUT A MOOSE HEAD?
Blogdaughter Tammi of Tammi's World is having a decorating conundrum:
My dilemma is my bedroom. I know I want to use taupe with some true red and touches of black. I don't go all girly and I hate a foo-foo bedroom. I like warm and comfy. I'm going to make the roman shade and bedcover. My problem is the art work. I hate a lot of stuff on the walls but I gotta have something. I have plenty of wall sconces (there's a surprise) but no paintings I own are "right" for in there. I've spent hours looking on line and just can't find anything that "slaps" me.
So I was wondering.....what art work do you have on your bedroom walls?
Can't help her much. The only things decorating our bedroom are a bunch of mirrors and a Bedroom Mood Meter plaque with both arrows permanently stuck on "less talk, more action".
But if you guys have any ideas, feel free to chime in.
Posted by: Harvey at
02:16 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 174 words, total size 1 kb.
January 23, 2006
Yay! I'm a Chickenhawk!
(cross-posted from
IMAO)
In the comments to this post, an anonymous troll posted the following:
So Harv, if it's so wonderful over in Iraq, why to hell aren't you over there serving in some capacity. Nothing to be afraid about buddy, I can assure you of that. Just make sure you bring along some decent body armor.
Why am I not in Iraq?
Probably because I'm a spineless coward who lets other people fight his battles for him.
But at least I have the decency to show some gratitude to those who have chosen to do so.
Anyway, I didn't want to have to play the "prior service" card, but since Spacemonkey & Daniel did it for me, I'll point out that I served on an aircraft carrier (USS Enterprise, CVN 65) during the late 80's. This was back when the Russian war plan included having nukes aimed at her, so I'm not a *complete* stranger to "ass on the line".
So what's YOUR excuse, anonymous troll? If you oppose the war, how come you're not in Iraq fighting alongside the terrorists?
There's probably nothing to be afraid about as long as you hide in a mosque.
Posted by: Harvey at
06:57 PM
| Comments (13)
| Add Comment
Post contains 205 words, total size 1 kb.
1
That's like asking "Why haven't the eco-nuts given up clothes and cars and houses and gone back to living off the land in harmony with mother nature?"
Their argument is the modern day equivalent of the playground taung: Well, if you like it so much, why don't you marry it?
Geez.
Posted by: gamongrel at January 23, 2006 07:13 PM (tYXgL)
2
Ah well, I am a chickenhawk too. An armed chickenhawk.
Posted by: Peter at January 23, 2006 09:00 PM (8lPb3)
3
Enterprise? Geez, am I sorry for you. That was Rickover's way of saying "screw you" to the surface fleet.
Posted by: SeanS at January 23, 2006 09:52 PM (cEjQ0)
4
He better thank his lucky stars he didn't come over here with that weak shit... I'd have fucked him up royally!
Posted by: Madfish Willie at January 23, 2006 10:23 PM (nVA0o)
5
Heh.
I love the "why aren't you over there" idiocy.
Especially from liberal asshats who don't know what a "devildog" is.
It's even funnier from asshats who don't know that I HAVE been over there.
It's especially amusing when I know I tried to go back over there, and was told I couldn't.
That's okay, though. Liberals just assume that everyone else is as big of a coward as they are.
Posted by: the Humble Devildog at January 23, 2006 10:35 PM (TIYju)
6
When people say stuff like that to me I generally reply with something along the lines of
"If every brave, America-loving person who appreciates his/her country and the freedoms he/she has through it were over there fighting.... Who would we be fighting for?"
Posted by: Joey at January 24, 2006 02:48 AM (JXgKx)
7
Enterprise? Wait, you didn't relieve the Kennedy in early 88 (or was that 89?), did you? Right after the Lybian shoot-down?
Posted by: Ogre at January 24, 2006 06:14 AM (/k+l4)
8
Sean - I actually *requested* the Enterprise. I liked the name.
Also, since I worked in the #4MMR, I giggle a lot whenever I watch Star Trek 4.
Ogre - Possibly. I never paid attention to who we relieved. I did two tours in the Arabian Sea/Indian Ocean: one in '88 and one in '90:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Enterprise_(CVN-65)#1980_to_1989
The Libya thing was before my time. I reported aboard in October of '87.
Posted by: Harvey at January 24, 2006 06:38 AM (ubhj8)
9
Now, Harvey, that's no way to be a sailor. You're supposed to keep track of which ship you relieve, so you'll know who's doing your girlfriend back at homeport.
Posted by: Tennessee Budd at January 24, 2006 06:51 AM (vflZD)
10
Tell'em Harvey! Can't believe there are idiots still trying to play that one without checking. One tried to do it the other day at Blackfive... Idiots, and not even useful ones at that.
Posted by: Laughing Wolf at January 24, 2006 10:22 AM (zI0Ey)
11
No, it was later than 87, I'm sure.
Dammit, now I'm going to have to go look it up and figure this out...
Posted by: Ogre at January 25, 2006 06:16 AM (/k+l4)
12
Ok, I found it (wasn't that bad after all).
I had it backwards and just missed you -- I was on the USS JFK in the med from August 1988 to February 1989. January, 1989, is when we shot down the Lybian MIGs. That was a fun day, let me tell you.
But it appears you were in the Arabian Sea in late '88? I wonder if we did joint exercises during the changeover...weird.
Then again, I'm betting most people don't know where they were in late 1988 and early 1989...
Posted by: Ogre at January 25, 2006 06:27 AM (/k+l4)
13
Ogre, I know where I was Feb. 2, 1989--I was reporting aboard the JFK as ship's company, AIMD, IM-3. Just a tip: if you can help it, never, ever report aboard the day after a ship has pulled in from a Med cruise.
Posted by: Tennessee Budd at January 25, 2006 11:50 AM (vflZD)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
The Horror!
(cross-posted from
IMAO)
(click to enlarge)
Photo by Polli Barnes Keller – Gulf Region Division – US Army Corps of Engineers
Iraqi children flee in terror at the approach of brutal American stormtroopers!
CENTCOM has the gruesome details.
Posted by: Harvey at
06:55 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 42 words, total size 1 kb.
1
So Harv, if it's so wonderful over in Iraq, why to hell aren't you over there serving in some capacity. Nothing to be afraid about buddy, I can assure you of that. Just make sure you bring along some decent body armor.
Posted by: harvibaby at January 24, 2006 11:03 AM (MRzL3)
2
That was me above. And it's funny.
Posted by: Sarah at January 24, 2006 11:05 AM (MRzL3)
3
No, not the original harvibaby, I am the imposter harvibaby. OK fine. It's not funny.
Posted by: Sarah at January 24, 2006 03:15 PM (ukLIB)
Posted by: Harvey at January 25, 2006 08:20 AM (ubhj8)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
TODAY'S GRAFFITI CURRENCY
(
Introduction)
(click to enlarge)
[(chewed-up quarter)]
...and this is your money on Democrats.
Any questions?
Posted by: Harvey at
06:47 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 19 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Susie at January 23, 2006 10:40 PM (a0oF7)
2
At least they didn't take my money like they do all the other times.
Posted by: Deathknyte at January 25, 2006 07:09 PM (nIWXy)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
*THAT* WAS DISAPPOINTING
You Are 50% Weird
|
Normal enough to know that you're weird...
But too damn weird to do anything about it!
|
[via blogdaughter/niece Sarah of That's Not Very Nice!]
Posted by: Harvey at
06:51 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 30 words, total size 1 kb.
1
That's okay, you can join my cult
Posted by: Contagion at January 23, 2006 08:17 AM (e8b4J)
2
I am not gonna take the damn quiz, but can guarentee I am at least 80% weird....
Posted by: ArmyWifeToddlerMom at January 23, 2006 08:23 AM (LLKLP)
3
You cheated... right? *grin*
Posted by: Teresa at January 23, 2006 08:45 AM (FZwDL)
4
You're weirder than THAT, Harvey!
Posted by: zonker at January 23, 2006 09:38 AM (/y7q3)
5
Hey, if I got a 70%, then Harvey should be at around 125%. Right?
Posted by: GEBIV at January 23, 2006 05:40 PM (LXoJ2)
6
I's surprised. I'm only 50% weird. Bummer. Now I'm going to go see if I'm at least a little bit hot.
Posted by: jonag at January 24, 2006 10:27 AM (pj3Ed)
7
You are wierder than I am??
Hunh....go figure.
Posted by: ktreva at January 24, 2006 08:34 PM (e8b4J)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 22, 2006
JUST BETWEEN YOU & ME
Beloved Wife TNT of
Smiling Dynamite turns 38 on Tuesday. This is just a heads-up to let you know that I'll be posting a birthday wish for her then, and I'd like you all to chime in with birthday greetings. Don't say anything yet. Just hide behind the couch & get ready.
[turns off lights]
Oh, and if you want to do something nice for her, she likes pictures of big cats, like lions, tigers, panthers, cougars, leopards, etc.
shhhhhh....
Posted by: Harvey at
10:00 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 87 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Damn, seems like just yesterday she turned 18...
Posted by: Ogre at January 23, 2006 02:45 PM (/k+l4)
2
[Ducks behind couch]
OK, are we yelling "Suprise!" or "Happy Birthday!"?
Posted by: GEBIV at January 23, 2006 06:20 PM (LXoJ2)
3
[whispering]Harv, Isn't this like her 3rd 38th birthday?!?!
Posted by: Blogless Brother at January 23, 2006 09:24 PM (3uzpC)
4
So does that make her 'an older woman'... or are you just a really cranky old limp-dick fucker? Inquiring Minds want to know!
Posted by: Inquiring Minds at January 23, 2006 10:26 PM (nVA0o)
5
BB - no more brownies for you! :-P
IM - actually it makes her either a MILF or a "hot amateur wife" :-)
Posted by: Harvey at January 24, 2006 06:27 AM (ubhj8)
6
Well... trackbacks seem to be down for the moment. So
PING!
Posted by: Teresa at January 24, 2006 10:53 AM (FZwDL)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
YAY! BUCKET!
The bucket o' Iowa stuff that I won from Jennifer's History & Stuff
for referring her 250,000th visitor arrived.
(click to enlarge)
As you can see, Jen knows how to pack securely.
Strange as it may seem, my favorite goodie from the whole collection (aside from - obviously - the official Iowa Hawkeyes chocolates) is the notepaper cube:
(click to enlarge)
Two reasons.
1) Notepaper cubes are hard to find, because most of them are made from Post-It Notes these days. I like the plain paper kind.
2) My current notepaper cube is totally gay
(click to enlarge)
So I just wanted to thank Jennifer for the goodies.
Now I'm gonna go fill that bucket with scotch & watch the playoffs.
Posted by: Harvey at
11:06 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 125 words, total size 2 kb.
1
pink notepads??? you fag!
Posted by: Madfish Willie at January 22, 2006 12:44 PM (nVA0o)
2
oh... and it's buckets of
beer and
bottles of scotch... silly-man - you can't drink scotch from a bucket!
Posted by: Madfish Willie at January 22, 2006 12:46 PM (nVA0o)
3
"you can't drink scotch from a bucket"
Is that a challenge? :-)
Posted by: Harvey at January 22, 2006 02:52 PM (ubhj8)
4
Your current notepaper pad is the gayest paper I have ever seen. I guess I'm not surprised though...
Now, as for your My Little Pony collection...
Posted by: Sarah at January 22, 2006 03:52 PM (siXBh)
Posted by: Harvey at January 22, 2006 08:42 PM (ubhj8)
6
Notepad - Gay
My Little Pony Collection - Very Very Gay
Posted by: Deathknyte at January 22, 2006 09:26 PM (Vbk0+)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
TODAY'S LOVE NOTE
(
Introduction)
I wanted to kiss this woman so bad, I wondered how I would stay alive without it.
(CAUTION: Romantics beware - comments may contain naughtiness)
[Like the Love Notes? Get the e-book]
Posted by: Harvey at
10:02 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 32 words, total size 1 kb.
TODAY'S GRAFFITI CURRENCY
(
Introduction)
(click to enlarge)
[BOMB SADDAM]
I think that instead of bombing this dam, we should try to figure out why it's sad and cheer it up.
Posted by: Harvey at
09:51 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 31 words, total size 1 kb.
Totally True Tidbits About Glenn Reynolds' DNA
(
A Filthy Lie cross-posted from
IMAO)
After being discovered in Los Angeles surrounded by a pile of recently-sacrificed hobos, Glenn Reynolds underwent a DNA test to see if he was the real killer.
Well, you KNOW what happens to DNA evidence in trials for murders committed in California, so Glenn walked, based on the fact that his hobo-murdering gloves were two sizes too small.
Ah, the power of washing things in hot water.
Nevertheless, I *did* manage to get ahold of a copy of the lab report on Glenn's DNA, from which I compiled these:
TOTALLY TRUE TIDBITS ABOUT GLENN REYNOLDS' DNA
While most humans have 98% of their DNA in common with a chimp, Glenn is 99% poodle.
Glenn's DNA will begin robot dancing if exposed to pure commie evil and/or Ted Kennedy.
Glenn's DNA was once shot a man for snoring too loud.
Remember that mobile weapons lab they found in Iraq? It was used for manufacturing Glenn's DNA.
Most people have Adenine, Guanine, Cytosine, and Thymine making up their DNA sequences. Glenn has Iodine, Einsteinium, Nitrogen, and Dysprosium, with the most common sequence being "I-N-D-E-E-D".
If Glenn's DNA bites you, you will start blogging by the next full moon.
If you're already a blogger, you will launch a blog ad consortium called "Lingerie Media" which people will make fun of.
Glenn's DNA made a cameo appearance during the Cantina scene in Star Wars. Look closely while Luke is talking to the bartender.
Glenn's DNA is used as currency in Iraq, although they pronounce it "dinar".
DNA tests prove that Glenn Reynolds and Michele Malkin are identical twins, but in an Arnold Shwarzenegger & Danny DeVito kinda way.
The secret ingredient in Underdog's "Super Energy Vitamin Pill" was Glenn's DNA. How's that for irony?
Traces of Glenn's DNA were found all over New Orleans, leading to speculation that Hurricane Katrina was caused by Glenn's typing too fast.
Glenn's DNA shows scars from where he had the "basic human decency" gene surgically removed.
Extensive testing on Glenn's DNA reveals that he's the real father of all those creepy "Village of the Damned" kids.
Glenn's DNA is featured prominently in the "Organic Chemistry Gone Wild: Spring Break" DVD.
Glenn's DNA released a rap album under the name "Vanilla Splice".
Injections of Glenn's DNA will cause a laboratory rat to grow inside a cancerous tumor.
If you're attacked by Glenn's DNA, point behind it and shout, "Look! An unlinked Ann Althouse post!". Flee when it turns to look.
Due to a defect in the 23rd chromosome, Glenn's DNA can NOT be trained to walk down stairs like a Slinky.
"What walks down stairs, alone or in pairs, and makes a slinkity sound?"... GAH! Now I can't get that stupid song out of my head!
Glenn's DNA always cries at the end of "Old Yeller".
And remember, the most commonly available source of Glenn Reynolds' DNA is rent-by-the-hour motel mattresses.
Oh, wait... that's for Kennedys.
Nevermind.
Posted by: Harvey at
09:44 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 508 words, total size 4 kb.
THOUGHT FOR THE DAY
From RSM of
When The Smoke Clears:
The road, lined on both sides with stands of pine and oak, provided the only egress the bird could see. He followed it, even rounding curves and turning left at a junction where I turned right, never once remembering he could fly up and away. He didnÂ’t need to stay on the path made by others, he had a freedom to go wherever he pleased, a freedom I envy, but his reaction to the stress of the moment was to keep following the trail that was never made nor appropriate for the likes of him.
Posted by: Harvey at
09:37 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 110 words, total size 1 kb.
MAYBE MY GEEK SKILLS ARE STRONGER THAN I THOUGHT
I saw every movie in the films section except "Clerks".
[Hat tip: Shadoglare of Refractional Darkness]
Posted by: Harvey at
09:23 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 28 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Heheh... Level One; Mere Dork...
Posted by: That 1 Guy at January 22, 2006 11:37 AM (4I2py)
2
WTF??? When did
that happen?
Posted by: Madfish Willie at January 22, 2006 12:49 PM (nVA0o)
3
If it helps any... I'm right there with you. And I checked ALL the films in the film section.
Posted by: RSM at January 22, 2006 01:06 PM (ODxF4)
4
Nice. I'm an "Uber Nerd." Great.
Posted by: Ogre at January 23, 2006 02:52 PM (/k+l4)
Posted by: michele at January 23, 2006 07:26 PM (Q5FRy)
6
Dang... only a level four 'Super Geek'. But aren't you supposed to get extra points for actually OWNING more than half the films?
Posted by: The Anti-Hippie at January 23, 2006 11:55 PM (14RzS)
7
Tsk tsk...
Clerks rules, the entire series loses context if you don't watch that film...
*grin*
BlueBerry Pick'n
can be found @
www.ThisCanadian.com
Posted by: BlueBerry Pick'n at January 24, 2006 08:59 AM (RwG41)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 21, 2006
WE COULD ALWAYS COUNT THEM AS 3/5THS, I SUPPOSE...
Saw this posted by TheBaldChick of
Freedom Folks:
Although illegals are barred from voting, they are counted when determining each state's number of seats in Congress.
Am I the only person who didn't know this?
Time for a new battle cry:
"No representation without legal immigration!"
Posted by: Harvey at
05:39 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 64 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Deathknyte at January 21, 2006 07:01 PM (+OfiQ)
2
AGREED!!!!!!!
Cindy aka Firstbrokenangel
Posted by: firstbrokenangel at January 22, 2006 09:54 AM (jHRvj)
3
Unless they're in North Carolina -- they very freely vote in North Carolina without any fear of repercussion.
Posted by: Ogre at January 24, 2006 05:51 AM (/k+l4)
4
Funny thing about black people only being counted as 3/5th of a person in the census is that was instituted not as a way of devaluing blacks by the anti-black rights democratic party but as a way of lessening the extra seats in congress adding them to the census would give to the anti-black rights democrats in southern states. The policy was pushed by the Republican abolitionists.
By being counted as a full "person" it would give more power to those who would hold them down. Ironic, isn't it?
Posted by: Graumagus at January 25, 2006 07:55 AM (RT+Wg)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
HUNTING FOR FREE LEGAL ADVICE
Blogson Andrew of Custos Honor has a question about
a ticket he got for sliding into someone on an icy road:
The Policeman who showed up ended up giving me a ticket for "Failed to stop in clear assured distance." The ticket no where mentions that the road was icy. nor does it mention that it (the accident) was on a semi-steep downhill road, so that I hit them coming from above, my truck literally slid the thirty feet to hit them. I'm going to fight this ticket, anyone know what kind of chances I have?
Oddy? Bueller? Anyone?
Posted by: Harvey at
11:41 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 109 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I gave him some info based on my own experience.
Posted by: Contagion at January 21, 2006 12:01 PM (e8b4J)
2
That's a BS charge like "exceeding safe speed for existing conditions" if you wreck due to rain. Contest it and he'll probbly win.
Posted by: tommy at January 21, 2006 06:29 PM (EhwJT)
3
I'd say your chances for a win are slim to none. The law requires you to operate the vehicle safely and maintain a safe distance irrespective of the conditions. The judge will likely say that, given the obvious slippery conditions, you should have kept even farther from the vehicle in front of you.
I'd pay the ticket, stay home and relax.
Posted by: Jim - PRS at January 21, 2006 06:35 PM (njBz/)
4
As Tommy mentioned above "exceeding safe speed for existing conditions" I got one of these,
you can't "win" BUT you can usally get it reduced plead not guilty, and at your pre-trial meet you'll have a chance to tell your side. Bring in a couple of pictures of where It happened to help them undrestand what your talking about. Remember "Yes Sir, No Sir" Being polite up never hurts.
Posted by: Blogless Brother at January 21, 2006 11:10 PM (h6l26)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
HEAD SCRATCHER
Is there a male equivalent to the social pressure that makes a woman get up early on a Saturday morning to drive 30 miles to a Pampered Chef party when she doesn't have even the
tiniest desire to buy anything there?
Maybe posting bail at 2am for your friend who just got busted for DUI?
Posted by: Harvey at
11:36 AM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 59 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I get it. I've done it. ;-) The pampered chef party that is....
Posted by: Tammi at January 21, 2006 11:42 AM (lfQya)
2
Probably not.
I'd say that the equivalent would be somewhere close to being forced to get up early so that you could go to an all day bachelor party that moves between bars and strip clubs, when you don't really have the tiniest interest in the hangover the following day.
You do it because you're a friend... that's all.
BTW, your fucking comments windows are pissing me right the hell off...
Posted by: That 1 Guy at January 21, 2006 11:49 AM (4I2py)
3
See?
The first line is gone. It was supposed to read:
Was she kicking and screaming about having to go?
Posted by: That 1 Guy at January 21, 2006 11:51 AM (4I2py)
4
Sure there is. But it depends on the guy. I've gotten up at 5:00 am, drove 2 hours to go to a gun show that I had absolutely no intension of buying anything.
Posted by: Contagion at January 21, 2006 11:55 AM (e8b4J)
5
yep, getting up in the dead of nightto go tailgaiting in the subfreezing temps of winter, for a team that has no chance in hell to win even a wild card position, like the Lions or the Jets or... you do it to hang out w/the guys, have some fun & lots of laughs @ the expense of others, drink some buds & most importantly so you won't be called a wus & get heat from the guys for avoiding the cold the remainder of the year.
Posted by: michele at January 21, 2006 01:10 PM (UjcAL)
6
Hey! I was gonna write what M wrote - 'cause I've done it.
Posted by: _Jon at January 22, 2006 10:19 AM (/R7YK)
7
I happen to be one of those women who when threatened with removal from bed before noon on the weekend will thrash arms and legs at the offending party. The idea of social activies on days I don't have to be at work makes me quite cranky.
Posted by: Tiffany at January 22, 2006 10:47 AM (FdZYE)
8
Hey... if your friend
just got busted, roll over and go back to sleep... he's gonna be there for a while - minimum of four hours!
Posted by: Madfish Willie at January 22, 2006 12:50 PM (nVA0o)
9
I only go to these party thing when one of my daughters is giving it; but I absolutely refuse to sign up to have one just to get extra points for her...
Posted by: maxnnr at January 22, 2006 07:55 PM (KxByJ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
BLOG LOVE
Blogson Blue Tige
pops the question:
Most of us are familiar with blog parents, blog grandparents, blog brothers and sisters, maybe even blog aunts and uncles. Those things are easy to figure out. What my question is, is what is YOUR input on blog relationships, blog dating, blog husbands and wives, blog flirting? Pick any or all and let me know what you consider to be right/wrong, good/bad, does/don'ts.
Some interesting discussion in his comments.
And he brings up a particular point during that discussion:
My realm for the question is only online. Not wanting to bring the idea of real life meetings into the picture. For instance do people or can people blog statements about so and so being my blog girlfriend/boyfriend, etc.
The important point with blog flirting (as with ANY flirting) is to keep it clear that it's a tease, and not a pass.
Good ways to maintain the clarity:
1) Be happily married and post love notes to your wife on a daily basis. Or at least regularly mention how happy she makes you. 75% of your flirting should be aimed at your significant other, then feel free to scatter the other 25% around as you see fit.
2) I've never heard the term blog boyfriend/girlfriend used. I think the terms have too much real-world weight to be useful for light flirting. Better to use less serious-sounding phrases. For example, I've seen the term "blog-crush". This sounds pretty 4th grade, so not much harm there. You can also take it in the opposite direction and use "love-slave in my blog-harem", which is so unrealistically over-the-top as to prevent anyone from taking it too seriously.
3) Using emoticons - like :-) or ;-) - after a flirtatious statement goes a long way toward preventing your intentions from being misinterpreted.
Aside from that, it's a matter of knowing your audience. Don't flirt with someone until you've read their blog long enough to understand their personality and sense of humor, then exercise the principles from point #2: be either cutely juvenile or blatantly exaggerated.
And always, ALWAYS remember point #1 - devote most of your energy towards flattering the one who wears the ring that matches yours.
Posted by: Harvey at
11:23 AM
| Comments (12)
| Add Comment
Post contains 372 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Good advice, Harvey...
Posted by: Richmond at January 21, 2006 12:14 PM (e8QFP)
2
Hard to do, for those of us who are single and welcome the attentions of those who not only literate, but good with a phrase.
Posted by: Miss Cellania at January 21, 2006 01:12 PM (8HRYA)
3
And something else Harvey does very well is that he spreads that 25% evenly so that the object of his flirtations have to compete for their continued 2% of adoration.
That way they know that their special to Harvey they are no means the only one in his life Which makes for a safe and harmless flirtation.
Posted by: michele at January 21, 2006 01:23 PM (UjcAL)
Posted by: Madfish Willie at January 21, 2006 01:26 PM (nVA0o)
5
or, of course, if your wedding rings don't match....
Posted by: caltechgirl at January 21, 2006 04:38 PM (uI/79)
6
:-*
*big wet kiss for Madfish Willie*
:-P
(with tongue)
Posted by: Harvey at January 22, 2006 10:14 AM (ubhj8)
7
Well, if you wanna see how ugly it can get when members of a blog family fight, go see what happened between my "blog daughter" and her husband. Oh, wait - you can't. They took their blogs down 'cause they were fighting *in* them. Very embarrassing....
Posted by: _Jon at January 22, 2006 10:23 AM (/R7YK)
8
Actually, SilentWarrior is back posting again.
Posted by: Harvey at January 22, 2006 10:29 AM (ubhj8)
9
Blog fights are fun... I had one once... ONCE!
Posted by: Madfish Willie at January 22, 2006 12:51 PM (nVA0o)
10
And if you stick that nasty ass tongue of yours in my mouth again, I'll bite the fucking thing off and stuff it up your ass!
Posted by: Madfish Willie at January 22, 2006 12:52 PM (nVA0o)
11
So, you're saying you want to put something up my ass?
NOW who's the homo? :-P
Posted by: Harvey at January 22, 2006 02:54 PM (ubhj8)
12
Bloody right: in my last year of U, I lost my significant other to 'chatline buddy'. 10 years ago, & I'm still bitter about it.
I'd have to call 'her' a 'buddy', as it turned out my 3-years-must-have-brought-on-boredom-Psychology-major-now-PhD-boyFIEND was doing the rub'n'tug with "Suzanne's" gay roommate, Dave.
I was pleased to tell him that: a week after he dumped me for not being 'as pretty' as the woman in the 'group photograph'.
Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned.
Only last year, my parent's marriage broke up after 40 years, because my denture-wearing geriatric mother started hoisting her nightie on C-U-C-me cameras...
*blech*
There really should be some form of cheating definition for that level of emotional trauma: losing your S.O. over their freaky masturbatory ritual...
BlueBerry Pick'n
can be found @
www.ThisCanadian.com
"Silent Freedom is Freedom Silenced"
Posted by: BlueBerry Pick'n at January 24, 2006 09:07 AM (RwG41)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
79kb generated in CPU 0.0333, elapsed 0.1238 seconds.
84 queries taking 0.1043 seconds, 310 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.