September 22, 2005
TODAY'S LOVE NOTE
(
Introduction)
This was love at first sight, love everlasting: a feeling unknown, unhoped for, unexpected - in so far as it could be a matter of conscious awareness; it took entire possession of him, and he understood, with joyous amazement, that this was for life.
(CAUTION: Romantics beware - comments may contain naughtiness)
[Like the Love Notes? Get the e-book]
Posted by: Harvey at
06:41 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 59 words, total size 1 kb.
TODAY'S GRAFFITI CURRENCY
(click to enlarge)
[
(red & purple splotches)]
Looks like another "GREAT TASTE!", "LESS FILLING!" argument got WAY out of hand...
Posted by: Harvey at
06:38 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 22 words, total size 1 kb.
September 21, 2005
HOW TO DISCOVER A QUALITY PRODUCT
If you're in the market for a product with which you have no experience and you don't know who to turn to for advice, Google can help.
Just type "[product name] sucks" (WITH quotes) into Google and see what comes up.
There's ALWAYS something, but once you read the specific complaints, you can judge for yourself if they're legitimate.
Is it some moron who can't type whose REAL complaint is that he couldn't return the product to the store without a receipt?
Or maybe it's someone who ACTUALLY knows his stuff who gives a list specific flaws and failures in the product.
The biggest thing you'll want to look for, though, is a pattern. If the same problem keeps getting mentioned on one link after another, you'll probably want to avoid that product.
The good news, though, is that a lot of times you'll see people chiming in with alternatives for the product you're considering - something you may never even have heard of. You might want to look into one of those, instead.
Final hint: if your "sucks" search turns up a dedicated site at www.productnamesucks.com, you REALLY might want to think twice before using it.
Posted by: Harvey at
07:35 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 208 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I agreed with you all up until the last sentence!
The company I work for has a www.productnamesucks.com site, and I beg to differ. We provide the kind of service that everyone always has a complaint on.
And, our competitors have the same type of sites.
Although you can find good information if the product has it's own "sucks website", doesn't mean the product is not worth it.
Posted by: Sissy at September 21, 2005 08:14 AM (uXS+O)
2
I stand corrected.
You're right, all a "thisproductsucks.com" site means is that the non-fans are particularly rabid.
It's also a pretty good marketing tool. For example, Mozilla owns "iesucks.com" :-)
Posted by: Harvey at September 21, 2005 08:55 AM (ubhj8)
3
Did this come from a personal incident recently? Because this is good advice, I had never thought of doing that. I usually just googled the product and "problems".
Posted by: Contagion at September 21, 2005 10:20 AM (Q5WxB)
4
You will be happy to know that "Bad Example Sucks" returns:
Your search - "Bad Example Sucks" - did not match any documents.
(Ogre Sucks shows 185, but Harvey Sucks is 578. Sorry, someone had to.)
Posted by: Ogre at September 21, 2005 12:31 PM (/k+l4)
5
Ogre - I'm just surprised it took you this long :-D
Posted by: Harvey at September 21, 2005 01:22 PM (ubhj8)
6
This is a great idea! I've had problems trying to google up critiques not just of products but of authors and ideas.
It's one of those "why-didn't-I-think-of-that" moments.
You've provided a real service with this one.
Posted by: dymphna at September 21, 2005 03:07 PM (3aoVE)
7
LOL Ogre!
Harvey, you should copyright this idea and market it ;-)
Posted by: Sissy at September 21, 2005 06:00 PM (uXS+O)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
TODAY'S LOVE NOTE
(
Introduction)
Love you... It's funny how two words can take up so little space on a piece of paper, but fill up ALL of the space in my heart.
(CAUTION: Romantics beware - comments may contain naughtiness)
[Like the Love Notes? Get the e-book]
Posted by: Harvey at
07:27 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 43 words, total size 1 kb.
1
...and how three little words like "tie you down" can take up all the space in my bed...
Posted by: Harvey at September 21, 2005 07:28 AM (ubhj8)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 20, 2005
LET THE BICKERING BEGIN!
(A Million Times Forwarded E-mail from Blogless Brother Roy)
NOTE: I got 19 "right", although I don't agree with all the answers given. If you want to dispute an answer, please leave a link to supporting evidence in the comments.
Answers in the extended entry.
This is based on U.S. info, so use all lobes of your brain. This can be more difficult than it looks - it just shows how little most of us really see!
There are 25 questions about things we see every day or have known about all our lives. How many can you get right? These little simple questions are harder than you think-- it just shows you how little we pay attention to the commonplace things of life.
Put your thinking caps on. No cheating! No looking around! No getting out of your chair! No using anything on or in your desk or computer!
Can you beat 20?? (The average is 7) Write down your answers as you go. Check answers (on the bottom) AFTER completing all the questions.
REMEMBER - NO CHEATING!!! BE HONEST!!! That means no looking at your phone or anything on your desk....
LET'S JUST SEE HOW OBSERVANT YOU REALLY ARE. - If not, just have fun!
Here we go!
1. On a standard traffic light, is the green on the top or bottom?
2. How many states are there in the USA? (Don't laugh, some people don't know)
3. In which hand is the Statue of Liberty's torch?
4. What six colors are on the classic Campbell's soup label?
5. What two numbers on the telephone dial don't have letters by them?
6. When you walk does your left arm ! swing with your right or left leg? (Don't you dare get up to see!)
7. How many matches are in a standard pack?
8. On the United States flag is the top stripe red or white?
9. What is the lowest number on the FM dial?
10. Which way does water go down the drain, counter or clockwise?
11. Which way does a "no smoking" sign's slash run?
12. How many channels on a VHF TV dial?
13. On which side of a women's blouse are the buttons?
14. Which way do fans rotate?
15. How many sides does a stop sign have?
16. Do books have even-numbered pages on the right or left side?
17. How many lug nuts are on a standard car wheel?
18. How many sides are there on a standard pencil?
19. Sleepy, Happy, Sneezy, Grumpy, Dopey, Doc. Who's missing?
20. How many hot dog buns are in a standard package?
21. On which playing card is the card maker's trademark?
22. On which side of a Venetian blind is the cord that adjusts the opening between the slats?
23. There are 12 buttons on a touch tone phone. What 2 symbols bear no digits?
24. How many curves are there in the standard paper clip?
25. Does a merry-go-round turn counter or clockwise?
more...
Posted by: Harvey at
08:15 AM
| Comments (36)
| Add Comment
Post contains 582 words, total size 3 kb.
1
19 as well. I feel really bad about the vhf dial thing to, the tricksy bastards.
Posted by: tommy at September 20, 2005 08:47 AM (EhwJT)
2
I have no clue about matches and can never remember it, nor the colors on campbells... I got 16... the others were stupid mistakes.
Posted by: vw bug at September 20, 2005 09:09 AM (J3xJ9)
3
I had 4, 9, 19 and 21 wrong giving me 21. Not bad. I had to really think on a couple.
Posted by: Contagion at September 20, 2005 09:27 AM (Q5WxB)
4
I impressed myself with 23 -- but there's no correct answer to #14 or #17 -- the fan goes whichever way I have the switch turned (all MY fans are reversible); and the number of lug nuts depends on the manufacturer -- I've seen from0 to 8.
Well, you did say, "Let the bickering begin..."
Posted by: at September 20, 2005 10:01 AM (/k+l4)
5
Dang silly thing -- that we me that just posted.
Posted by: Ogre at September 20, 2005 10:02 AM (/k+l4)
6
22. I remembered some from the first time I took it on that oft emailed thing you mentioned.
Posted by: StinKerr at September 20, 2005 10:02 AM (0aiy7)
7
well, I got eighteen correct myself-- had no idea what a VHF tv was. Or the other dwarf . . .
Posted by: Andrew (Aris Ravencroft) at September 20, 2005 10:08 AM (mtIIe)
8
That Northern Hemisphere/drain answer is incorrect. Tests show no statistical difference between direction of drainage in either hemisphere.
So, the correct answer is 'both.'
Don't make me sic Adam and Jamie on you. Or Snopes. 'Cause I will.
Posted by: basil at September 20, 2005 10:27 AM (/kWTw)
9
21... vhf and phones aren't my friends.
Posted by: That 1 Guy at September 20, 2005 10:31 AM (24QL2)
10
Basil - Sic away. I *did* ask for supportive linkage.
Here's the one for the drain:
http://www.ucolick.org/~mountain/AAA/answers/physics/ph16.html
And the Honda Accord 4-door sitting in my garage has 4 lug nuts :-)
Posted by: Harvey at September 20, 2005 10:40 AM (ubhj8)
11
18 correct could have been worse.
Posted by: Dr. Phat Tony at September 20, 2005 10:46 AM (fk/lm)
12
Looks like I hold the title for 'Village Idiot' again! 13 is what I got. Beat that for low score...
Posted by: Sarah at September 20, 2005 10:50 AM (TjUtr)
13
Got 18 here. I'm officially disputing number 25. My wife and daughter rode one several weekends ago going clockwise. Link provided shows they do exist, so the answer should be "both"
http://images.myphotoalbum.com/p/pr/pri/prin/princ/princesshei/albums/pic_wid_cyn/P1010643.sized.jpg
Posted by: silentwarrior at September 20, 2005 12:36 PM (f8kXi)
14
I got 21 if I go by THEIR answers, but I agree with "both" on the ceiling fan. I DID know how many VHF channels there are, but that's only because I grew up in the olden times befoe cable television....
Posted by: Susie at September 20, 2005 01:30 PM (a0oF7)
15
Every stop sign I've ever seen has had two sides...
Posted by: Chuck at September 20, 2005 02:14 PM (JXgKx)
16
25 out of 25
Do I get a cookie?
Posted by: Sarah the penguin at September 20, 2005 04:39 PM (b/AVI)
17
SarahP - Even better - you get a spanking! :-)
Posted by: Harvey at September 20, 2005 05:09 PM (ubhj8)
18
What's VHF? ;-)
I got 17.
Posted by: Sissy at September 20, 2005 05:32 PM (uXS+O)
Posted by: tbflowers at September 20, 2005 06:41 PM (5b51t)
20
I only got 20. VHF?!?! And I agree - 2 sides to a stop sign - I even changed my answer from 5 to 2!!
Posted by: Tammi at September 20, 2005 07:07 PM (WOrLQ)
21
24 out of 25. Dang gold on the soup can.
And VHF? Come on - I'm 19 and remember VHF. Family used to own two of 'em.
now UHF - that was a great movie.
Posted by: The Babaganoosh at September 20, 2005 08:09 PM (Ygzou)
22
23-I have to argue the fan question as well.
VHF was easy. I grew up in the olden days, too and all the best kid shows were on channel 13!
Posted by: Anna at September 20, 2005 09:09 PM (nVvoC)
23
20. I was sure the merry g' round (it won't let me put hyphens in or include that "o," that makes it "questionable content") went the other way. I don't want to talk about it.
Posted by: Linus at September 20, 2005 09:20 PM (Bf+TD)
24
22 out of 25.
My ceiling fan spins both ways...
Matches come in books, small boxes, and big boxes... Techncially, those are all "packs."
And 9 is not necessarily correct. If you've got a digital radio, the tuner can go down to 87. Analog tuners can go down this far, but a better wording would have been "What is the lowest number that appears on the analog FM dial?"
Being a technical writer introduces all kinds of fun little quirks into your thought process.... 8- )
Posted by: LightFuseGetAway at September 21, 2005 01:54 AM (K6EdX)
25
I got 17 and yes I missed the lug nuts one. That is because in todays world there is no standard number any more.
Posted by: Machelle at September 21, 2005 07:19 AM (ZAyoW)
26
Harvey, I'm sure you missed #6, but don't feel bad--the Navy never taught us how to march anyway.
Posted by: Tennessee Budd at September 21, 2005 07:46 AM (fjXUW)
27
19, but only cos the water-down-the-drain thing is wrong: water goes down the drain CW or CCW, depending on different factors, The old "northern hemishere/southern hemisphere CW/CCW" fallacy is so old it has whiskers, but it's still false. Last person who disagreed on that got an all-expense-paid trip to my kitchen (double) sink, where I showed him one side draining one way, then the other side training the other way.
Oh, and people who count the numbers of matches in a book are anal-retentive jerks.
:-)
Posted by: David at September 21, 2005 09:15 AM (ACL5/)
28
"training-draining" Water obeys my will.
Posted by: at September 21, 2005 09:16 AM (ACL5/)
29
David,
There's one match for every cigarette in a pack.
Simple.
Posted by: Chuck at September 21, 2005 09:30 AM (JXgKx)
30
bah, 19. i remember VHF, but forgot there wasn't a #1
Posted by: Patriot Xeno at September 21, 2005 02:01 PM (YRSCV)
31
20 yay! I was one color away on the soup can. Green instead of yellow. And the lowest the FM dial goes
is 87.9 since FM bands operate within a 0.2MHz range.
Posted by: SeanS at September 23, 2005 06:30 AM (cEjQ0)
32
Of course the question is what do they mean by "FM dial"?
Is it the lowest broadcast freqency that's actually used? (87.9)
Is it the lowest number printed on the faceplate of an analog radio? (8
Is it the lowest number a digital tuner will display? (87.5 on mine)
Posted by: Harvey at September 23, 2005 10:01 AM (ubhj8)
33
my venetian blinds cord is on the right
Posted by: Bakasan at October 08, 2005 07:35 PM (M7kiy)
34
Actually, a VHF has 12 numbers on it, not 11 (depending if your top number is 12 or 13). Count with me:
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 , 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 (U is for UHF, obviously)
The lowest broadcast frequency is 85.5, which is what I answered.
As for water flowing counterclockwise above the equator, that's a bunch of BS:
http://www.loc.gov/rr/scitech/mysteries/coriolis.html
It all depends upon how the water was introduced and the geometric structure of the drain.
One can find both counterclockwise and clockwise flowing drains in both hemispheres. Some people would like you to believe that the Coriolis force affects the flow of water down the drain in sinks, bathtubs, or toilet bowls. DonÂ’t believe them! The Coriolis force is simply too weak to affect such small bodies of water.
As for FM frequencies, in the United States, frequency-modulated broadcasting stations operate in a frequency band extending from 87.8 MHz to 108.0 MHz, for a total of 20.2 MHz. It is divided into 100 channels, each 0.2 MHz wide, designated "channel 200" through "channel 300." In actual practice, no one (except the FCC) uses these channels numbers; the frequencies are used.
To receive a station, an FM receiver is tuned to the center frequency of the station's channel. The lowest channel, channel 200, extends from 87.8 MHz to 88.0 MHz; thus its center frequency is 87.9 MHz. Channel 201 has a center frequency of 88.1 MHz, and so on, up to channel 300, which extends from 107.8 to 108.0 MHz and has a center frequency of 107.9 MHz.
Regards,
BfB
Posted by: BfB at October 09, 2005 03:35 PM (vFUMR)
35
Oops, not sure how the "The lowest broadcast frequency is 85.5, which is what I answered." got on there. I copied that from my bro-in-law's email by accident. I answered 87.8.
Posted by: BfB at October 09, 2005 03:39 PM (vFUMR)
36
I think someone should turn over their playing cards. It says bicycle on the back of all 52 of mine.
Posted by: gurton at November 13, 2005 01:59 AM (bxOjK)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
WHY I DON'T LIKE CSI
Via Lynn of
Reflections in D Minor, I found
this disapproving review of CSI at Plugged In. This quote pretty much sums it up:
Twenty years ago on Quincy, Jack Klugman described the murders he uncovered each week. CSI shows theirs. From every angle. Over and over again. A drug-crazed raver strangles his friend. A woman caves in a manÂ’s skull with a rock. A man shoots himself in the head. A teenager stabs an entire family to death with a kitchen knife. The detectives are fond of saying that blood "talks." It also flies, drips, runs and pools on the floor. CSI is ugly, exploitative, gross, [and] disrespectful of the dead [...]
True.
But what they don't mention is what turns me off the most about this show: the detectives' antiseptic indifference to what they see.
When Quincy described the autopsies he did on his victims, there was always a suppressed undertone of outrage in his voice, as though - even after all his years as a Medical Examiner - he was still mortified at the inhumanity that was shown to the bodies he was examining.
CSI? They couldn't care less. They're cold, emotionless... practically bored. It's just another classroom exercise to them. Whatever.
Mostly I avoid the show, although I occasionally peek in just to see if someone is going to feel something.
I'm still waiting.
Posted by: Harvey at
07:23 AM
| Comments (15)
| Add Comment
Post contains 236 words, total size 2 kb.
1
To even compare CSI to Quincy is insane. It's sort of like comparing Evil Glennn to Bambi. CSI is simply trying to exploit the public's current desire for blood and gore and trying to shock more and more than anyone else.
Posted by: Ogre at September 20, 2005 08:00 AM (/k+l4)
2
I don't know about the spin-off CSIs, but in the original, they do have
some emotions. In fact, one of them (Sidle) is always getting in trouble whenever there seems to be a domestic violence case because she keeps attacking the suspects like a rabid pit-bull. (Verbally that is. She never shoots anyone.) She's contrasted with Grissom, who is accused of having no emotions.
But at the same time, you do have to realistically expect some detatchment from a professional in that position. Otherwise they would burn out with the first unsolved case they get.
I love to watch that show, but I do have one problem with it. It tends to portray the technology a little unrealistically. For example, you can't get DNA cross-matching in half an hour. In the real world, it takes weeks. (Although, maybe things are different in Vegas...)
Posted by: GEBIV at September 20, 2005 08:03 AM (VaRSl)
3
All that said, I really liked to watch Quincy too.
Posted by: GEBIV at September 20, 2005 08:04 AM (VaRSl)
4
I agree on the most part with Gebiv. I love CSI, the orriginal. I don't like the others.
I think they do a decent job of portraying the emotional issues of the individuals that work in that field. From my personal experience especially after pulling bodies out of rivers, handling suicide victims, assisting in the removal of bodies from cars, doing autopsies on 18 month old babies, investigating child rape cases and listening to someone burn to death in a house fire 20 miles away. You tend to have to seperate your emotions, if you don't you will lose it. You can be outraged at people, but there is time for that AFTER you do your job.
There is a reason I have no love for people.
Posted by: Contagion at September 20, 2005 08:15 AM (Q5WxB)
5
I really, really hate it when detectives show emotions! Its unrealistic, you cant deal with dead bodies every day and agonize about it without going mad in two weeks! Even in CSI there was too much of it! One character there particularly vexed me in this regard - she had this constant gaze as if she were to cry any moment.
Though I dont think its the actual showing of emotions by detectives - I dont mind Hercule Poirot getting angry for example - its probably the bad acting on display.
Posted by: lemuel at September 20, 2005 09:10 AM (aOCIX)
6
Contagion - granted, there's a certain level of realism involved, but the thing is - this is a TV show. It doesn't HAVE to be realistic. They can make their characters more sympathetic if they want to, and the 299+ million people who DON'T work the job won't know the difference.
But the producers of CSI and/or its spin-offs don't care, as long as they get enough camera time for their corpse-porn - because getting to show realistic dead body parts is what it's all about.
Anyway, if the Quincy comparison doesn't work, how about in Silence of the Lambs when Agent Starling examines the corpse? She showed both emotion AND professionalism.
Posted by: Harvey at September 20, 2005 09:14 AM (ubhj8)
7
I disagree, I think that is why the show is doing as well as it is. People that worked the job, and/or know people that did see the realism of it. Of course the time frames and the exactness they get stuff done in isn't true at all.
I will agree the show does like it's special effects, and they are great.
As for Starling in Silence of the Lambs... good movie, complete BS and Starling in the movie was a newbie... She wouldn't have developed a sensitivity to it yet. Think of in CSI when they took Greg Sanders in to view his first corpse and he couldn't look at it and was all nervous and almost got sick. Same thing there.
Posted by: Contagion at September 20, 2005 09:32 AM (Q5WxB)
8
Harv- If you ever meet my sister I'll have to have her do her CSI impression for you. It's really funny. She hates that show.
Posted by: Bou at September 20, 2005 05:49 PM (5JHEt)
9
MY main bitch is why don't they ever turn the fucking lights on.... WTF is it with that?
Posted by: Madfish Willie at September 20, 2005 09:00 PM (YFiLK)
10
Willie - DAMN good question.
Low lighting has become VERY hip & trendy in TV shows.
Maybe they're trying to cover a lack of acting ability :-)
Posted by: Harvey at September 20, 2005 09:24 PM (ubhj8)
11
My gripe is all you intelligent people sitting around watching a fucking soap opera. And *all* of them are soap operas.
And don't give me that "down time" bullshit.
How about each of you get a hobby that will provide what you need (relaxation) *and* allow you to help the current generation or leave something that benefits the next?
Be a "Creator" rather than just a "Consumer".
Posted by: _Jon at September 20, 2005 10:01 PM (sSrI9)
12
I simply watch it because George "Nick" Eads is HOT!
I'd do him anytime, anywhere.
Posted by: Machelle at September 21, 2005 07:24 AM (ZAyoW)
13
I don't watch Tv, so it doesn't much affect me. However, I caught a bit of that show at a friend's house one night. What bothered me about it was that they were wildly inaccurate on technical details. I've heard that some people are impressed by the show's "realism", but those are folks who don't know anything about real-world blood & gore.
Dilletantes.
Posted by: Tennessee Budd at September 21, 2005 07:49 AM (fjXUW)
14
_Jon - I blog about boobies, and I do it for the children :-)
Posted by: Harvey at September 21, 2005 08:35 AM (ubhj8)
15
I'm with Willie, WTF with the damn lights? but it IS nice to see someone mention Quincy, which is my favorite show of ALL time. Did you know it just came out on DVD?
Posted by: caltechgirl at September 21, 2005 01:04 PM (Dp8Wb)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
SO, WHAT *DID* YOU DO IN THE NAVY?
Owen of Boots & Sabers
pretty much sums it up:
1. Go to Sea.
2. Drink Coffee.
3. Watch porn.
4. Deploy the Marines
For information on what OTHER members of the US Armed Services do, click the link above.
Posted by: Harvey at
07:19 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 56 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Sissy at September 20, 2005 05:34 PM (uXS+O)
2
Ha P-3 sailors didnt even have to go to sea just fly and collect per diem checks lol plus flight pay dont forget the flight pay. That and looking good in the leather flight jacket while drinking coffee lol
Regards,
GBfan
Posted by: gbfan001 at September 20, 2005 05:50 PM (TQzKH)
3
Didn't you stand watch? I did. Lots of it. 5 and dime. All the time.
Posted by: SeanS at September 23, 2005 06:34 AM (cEjQ0)
4
LOTS of watches, and the hours depended on how many qualified people we had available at the time for any given station.
12/12, 6/6, 4/8, 4/12... I think the best I ever had it was 4/20 - that was nice :-)
And how does a 15-hour shift track with a 24 hour day? Your watchbills must've been a mess! :-)
Posted by: Harvey at September 23, 2005 10:06 AM (ubhj8)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
BASIL'S DOING INTERVIEWS
I'm debating whether to sign up.
Meanwhile, peruse the list of upcoming victims & submit questions.
If you're stumped, try these for inspiration.
Posted by: Harvey at
07:18 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 29 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Sign you up, you say? With pleasure!
Posted by: basil at September 20, 2005 10:15 AM (/kWTw)
2
DOH!
Fine :-/
My turn probably won't arrive until sometime next year anyway :-)
Posted by: Harvey at September 20, 2005 10:36 AM (ubhj8)
3
I'm glad you are in...we need more Bad Example Family members in there!
Posted by: Sissy at September 20, 2005 05:35 PM (uXS+O)
4
Okay. I'm all signed up. If this goes terribly I'm witholding your royalty check/trackbacks.
Posted by: Tiffany at September 20, 2005 08:50 PM (bj98V)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
TODAY'S LOVE NOTE
(
Introduction)
The four most important words in any marriage... "I'll do the dishes."
(CAUTION: Romantics beware - comments may contain naughtiness)
[Like the Love Notes? Get the e-book]
Posted by: Harvey at
07:04 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 27 words, total size 1 kb.
1
..."I'll do the dishes" being a euphemism for...
Posted by: Harvey at September 20, 2005 07:06 AM (ubhj8)
Posted by: _Jon at September 20, 2005 10:03 PM (sSrI9)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
TODAY'S GRAFFITI CURRENCY
(click to enlarge)
[
Ashley Blossom]
REVEALED! The names of two interns that Bill Clinton actually didn't have sexual relations with!
Posted by: Harvey at
07:00 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 24 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Where did you get this dollar bill? I would love to know why you have connected it to Bill Clinton. This is someone I k now.
Posted by: RBlossom at October 30, 2005 05:43 PM (pGt8m)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 19, 2005
HAPPY BIRTHDAY PIXY!
Pixy Misa of
Ambient Irony and benevolent host of all MuNu blogs everywhere is turning... uh... details are sketchy...
Anyway, it's the 20th in Australia now.
Besides, it's an excuse to post smut (which I'll put in the extended entry as a courtesy to work-surfers - it's technically safe, but hard to explain):
more...
Posted by: Harvey at
08:36 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 62 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Now is this cat-blogging or p****-blogging?
I need to know the difference.
(Sorry, I'm new to this stuff...)
PS - Meowwwww!
Posted by: jimmyb at September 19, 2005 09:52 PM (L0ZvJ)
2
Now see, Harvey.
You're setting a bad examp...
Never mind.
Posted by: jimmyb at September 19, 2005 09:53 PM (L0ZvJ)
3
Y'know, airmail stamps are about that size and self adhesive. If you REALLT want to go minimalist, there you go. Just make sure she stands against a wall. Don't want to cause a riot.
:-D
Posted by: tommy at September 19, 2005 10:11 PM (EhwJT)
4
that's got to be the worst airbrush job of all time.....
Posted by: caltechgirl at September 20, 2005 12:05 AM (XbkBK)
5
CTG - not airbrush, just a REALLY good wax job :-)
Tommy - By the way, that's NOT the "least there" bikini I've ever seen a picture of.
Uh... not that I spend a whole lot of time looking... :-)
Posted by: Harvey at September 20, 2005 09:01 AM (ubhj8)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
WHO'S UP ON THEIR BRITISH SLANG?
With today being "Talk Like a Pirate Day" (Sept 19th), the phrase "Jolly Rogering" gets tossed around a lot.
Some Googling informs me that "rogering" is British slang for intercourse, but here's where things get fuzzy. Various sources claim that rogering:
1) refers to intercourse in general
2) refers specifically to the more frantic & enthusiastic "Take me! Take me NOW!" sort of intercourse
3) refers specifically to anal intercourse (although they didn't specify whether it was homosexual, heterosexual, or both)
Anyone familiar with across-the-pond euphemisms, feel free to clarify.
Posted by: Harvey at
07:37 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 102 words, total size 1 kb.
1
1 or 2, but not 3. There was a children's TV show about pirates in which one of the characters would say, "I'm off downstairs to Roger the cook." :-D
I think that another character was called, "Seaman Staines." They got away with a lot in the seventies. Remember that "Rainbow" episode?
Posted by: Sally at September 20, 2005 04:03 AM (T/9Zp)
Posted by: GEBIV at September 20, 2005 08:06 AM (VaRSl)
Posted by: Madfish Willie at September 20, 2005 09:02 PM (YFiLK)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
HOW TO LIVEN UP A WEDDING
I got stuck going to a wedding on Saturday. It was nice enough, I guess, but... boring.
So here are some suggestions for livening up your next wedding:
* Flower fights ("OW! Thorn!")
* Stripper bridesmaids
* Ninja attack!
* Hire the pyrotechnics guys from KISS
* Wouldn't it be cool if - when the priest said "If anyone objects to this union, let him speak now or forever hold his peace" - the ceiling collapsed?
* Replace "I now pronounce you man and wife" with "Let's get ready to RRRUMMMMBLLLLLE!!!"
* Light the unity candle with a flaming arrow
* Wedding program basketball ("Bride's cleavage! Two points!")
* Have the happy couple exchange vows while leaping from pew to pew
* "Accidentally" spill holy water on yourself and run around the chapel screaming "IT BURNS! IT BURNS!"
I'm open to other suggestions.
Posted by: Harvey at
09:34 AM
| Comments (11)
| Add Comment
Post contains 155 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Replace vows with a list of things the groom will no longer be able to do.
Posted by: Dr. Phat Tony at September 19, 2005 10:12 AM (fk/lm)
2
Don't forget to list the things the bride will have to put up with!
Posted by: Anna at September 19, 2005 11:51 AM (LQ2ZG)
3
Drunken midgets. They're always fun.
Posted by: Ogre at September 19, 2005 12:01 PM (/k+l4)
4
Richard Simmons leading the ceremony, blowing bubbles and throwing flowers.
Posted by: Sarah at September 19, 2005 12:16 PM (YizDi)
5
...at drunken midgets....
Posted by: Sarah at September 19, 2005 12:18 PM (YizDi)
6
My husband suggested I walk down the aisle to 'Brick House'. If his parents had not been attending, I would have done it. Well, if the pastor would have let us. GRIN.
Posted by: vw bug at September 19, 2005 12:27 PM (J3xJ9)
7
Add dirty things to the vows. "Do you promise to use the whip lovingly and tenderly?"
Posted by: SeanS at September 19, 2005 02:14 PM (cEjQ0)
8
Hmm, it's gonna be hard to top drunken midgets, but let's see what I can do. Oh, I know. When the bride and groom kiss, everyone fires their handguns into the air (blanks, since the bullets falling back to the Earth would hurt). Maybe have then shout "Yeeee-Hawwww!".
...No, still doesn't top drunken midgets. Well, when you mentioned stripper bridesmaids, shouldn't that also include Chipendale best men? I'm not a girl, but I don't think they'd appreciate being left out.
You mentioned flowers earlier with thorns. How about we wrap the roses in barbed wire? Don't know why, but the image of a rose wrapped in barbed wire is just cool.
I GOT IT!!!! SOMETHING CLOSE TO BEING UP WITH DRUNKEN MIDGETS! Have the flower girl be a stripper, but her dress is the flowers that she throws, and she throws flowers off her body as she proceeds down the aisle.
...wait, aren't flower girls supposed to be little kids? Umm, I think I'm going to stop now before I get myself in trouble.
Gunlord
Posted by: gunlord at September 19, 2005 05:14 PM (ncZJ2)
9
drawing lots to see who gets to take the garter off the bride.
take a shot every time the families respond with 'amen'.
groom has to wrestle the father-in-law for the bride.
woolen tuxes and dresses for the wedding party.
freshly smithied wedding rings.
a real ball and chain.
put the key to their chatity belts somewhere in the cakes.
Indiana Jones type exit down the aisle or be crushed by a rolling boulder.
The preacher must take regular shots of Nitrous Oxide.
the wedding families must sit on those children's bouncy ball toys instead of pews.
icy hot in the married couple's undies
35 degree water balloons to be tossed by the families at any member of the wedding party that doesn't perfectly fullfil thier duties as dictated during the rehearsal.
Posted by: tbflowers at September 19, 2005 09:01 PM (3MN6L)
10
Musical Brides and Grooms. Whoever from the wedding party is left standing in the "couples" places when the music stops, gets to be wed. I guess the guests could participate to make it interesting.
Posted by: Sticks at September 20, 2005 05:24 AM (iOrTL)
11
How about simultaneous moons from the Bride & Groom in place of the kiss?
Posted by: Jamie Dawn at September 22, 2005 12:52 PM (LR+07)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
YARRRR!
As Ogre has been
reminding us for the last month or so, it's
International Talk Like a Pirate Day.
To celebrate, I went surfing and landed this prize:
The Top 15 Pirate Pick-Up Lines
15. "I must be huntin' treasure, 'cause I'm diggin' yer chest."
14. "You're just the tasty wench I've been keeping me eye out for!"
13. "Hey, sexy -- how about a Jolly Rogering?"
12. "Ya certainly put the shiver in me timber."
11. "See this hook? Variable speed with five alternate attachments, Baby."
10. "WOW! I bet we could fit SIXteen men on that chest!"
9. "Me skull and crossbones arn't the only thing I plan on raisin' tonight."
8. "Do ya mind if the parrot watches?"
7. "Nice poop deck on ya, lassie. Care fer a swabbin'?"
6. "Avast, me pretty! Strike your panties and prepare to be boarded."
5. "So you're the new cabin boy, eh?"
4. "Do you have the latest copy of Windows XP with cracked product activation?" (software pirates only)
3. "Yo, ho! Bottle of rum?"
2. "Arrrrrrrrrrrrrrrre you free on Saturday?"
and the Number 1 Pirate Pick-Up Line...
1. "Is there an 'X' on the seat of your pants? Because it appears that there's wond'rous booty buried underneath!"
Posted by: Harvey at
07:58 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 210 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Arghhh! Ye think ye be funny!
Posted by: Oddybobo at September 19, 2005 08:25 AM (6Gm0j)
2
RODL (That's rolling on the DECK laughing).
Posted by: Ogre at September 19, 2005 11:58 AM (/k+l4)
3
(finishes writing)
Thanks HARVEY!
Posted by: Contagion at September 19, 2005 02:50 PM (Q5WxB)
4
WENCH: So you're a pirate are you? Where's your buccaneers?
PIRATE: Right here under my buckin' hat!
Posted by: Dane Bramage at September 19, 2005 04:24 PM (5r7F+)
5
shiver me timber, wench!
Look matey, I've got a bowsprit.
Arrr! Rival a bilge pump she would.
Posted by: tbflowers at September 19, 2005 09:11 PM (3MN6L)
6
Mmmmmmmmm.....activation cracks...
Posted by: jimmyb at September 19, 2005 09:56 PM (L0ZvJ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
TODAY'S LOVE NOTE
(
Introduction)
If you can't giggle, tickle, scream, laugh, run around the room naked, pour liqueur on each other and lick it off, tie each other down, have whipped cream fights, and dance and sing with each other, then you are having sex with the person too soon.
(CAUTION: Romantics beware - comments may contain naughtiness)
[Like the Love Notes? Get the e-book]
Posted by: Harvey at
07:49 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 61 words, total size 1 kb.
1
...Finished!... Now... what shall we do tomorrow night?...
Posted by: Harvey at September 19, 2005 07:50 AM (ubhj8)
2
Chuh? The
comments may contain naugtiness? What about the love note itself?
Posted by: GEBIV at September 19, 2005 12:00 PM (XQ/5F)
3
Yeah no kidding, dirty Harvey!!
Posted by: Sarah at September 19, 2005 01:33 PM (qOSV/)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
TODAY'S GRAFFITI CURRENCY
(click to enlarge)
[
(dollar bill - boredom - pink hi-liter)]
After Washington's "Pretty in Pink" incident, the Army modified it's "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy to include "Don't Drop Really Obvious Hints".
Posted by: Harvey at
07:36 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 31 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Susie at September 19, 2005 01:57 PM (a0oF7)
2
What's this? Queer eye for the dead guy?
Posted by: SeanS at September 19, 2005 02:10 PM (cEjQ0)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 18, 2005
GET CENTCOM IN YOUR INBOX
Did you know that you can sign up for the
CentCom newsletter & keep up on what's going on with the war?
I'm sure the MSM gets these news releases.
Interesting to see that they don't think they're newsworthy.
Posted by: Harvey at
02:11 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 49 words, total size 1 kb.
1
That is very cool. It's nice to not have to rely on the media for once.
Posted by: SeanS at September 18, 2005 06:46 PM (cEjQ0)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
86kb generated in CPU 0.0339, elapsed 0.1203 seconds.
85 queries taking 0.1015 seconds, 329 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.