1
How about "bi zarro bench" The only place where a guy can be holding a purse and he's doing his duty, not being John Edwards-like.
Posted by: ChrisA at November 06, 2007 03:24 AM (TnrKn)
2
Umm, maybe "Bench Never Seen by Smart Men"?
I always tell my women that if they wanna shop, they'll do it alone. Thankfully, none of my women (so far in life, & that's several) have shown the slightest desire to "shop". They've all been of my mindset--get in, get what you need, get out.
Posted by: Tennessee Budd at November 06, 2007 03:57 PM (Kk1xh)
If I never spoke another word again, I would still tell you "I love you" every day - with my eyes, my hands, and an endless supply of kisses. You would always know that you are loved.
(CAUTION: Romantics beware - comments may contain naughtiness)
Posted by: Harvey at
04:51 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 56 words, total size 1 kb.
Because hybrids make virtually no noise at slower speeds when they run solely on electric power, blind people say they pose a hazard to those who rely on their ears to determine whether it's safe to cross the street or walk through a parking lot.
Funny how you're not hearing the self-righteous hippies bragging about THIS aspect of their green revolution.
1
Well, I believe YOU over the back-stabbing skank who wrote the series, so Dumbledore is NOT GAY.
Yeah, I feel better already.
Posted by: pam at November 01, 2007 06:26 AM (l6NIn)
2
The husband agrees with you, Harvey.
But, what if she gets around to that "Harry Potter encyclopedia" she mentioned? The one with all the characters' back stories?
Would that be accepted?
(P.S. That would be the only kind of "sequel" I would wish to read.)
Posted by: Roses at November 01, 2007 07:39 AM (6KPV+)
Posted by: sarahk at November 01, 2007 08:04 AM (WPGzA)
4
Um, who cares? There is no evidence that Dumbledore diddled any students, either male, female or some in-between known only in the Wizarding World.
There are only two times when someone's sexual orientation is of interest to me, if that person is potentially a partner of mine or if that person has some sexual contact with my children, or now, grandchildren.
Since ol' Albus has never lifted his robes around me or mine, so what?
Posted by: Peter at November 01, 2007 11:45 AM (kKSQ2)
5
Yep, when I first read that she said that, I was all like BFD, who cares? I mean, it's not like we all haven't wondered about Richard Harris anyway, right? (Who did leave the cake out in the rain?)
Posted by: Susie at November 01, 2007 01:25 PM (6dWH+)
6
Roses - I'd consider that every bit as Apocryphal as the Gospel of St. Thomas.
Posted by: Harvey at November 01, 2007 05:17 PM (L7a63)
7
Well sure... but remember that scene in Book 6 on Page 164 where he taps his foot? He could have reached under the stall wall...
Posted by: Ogre at November 02, 2007 10:30 AM (oifEm)
8
Don't you know better, Ogre! He just has a wide stance!
In all seriousness, let him be gay. What's it matter as long as he's not pulling Harry in a back room and... well, you know what I'm getting at.
Posted by: Justin at November 03, 2007 10:33 AM (+ObG3)
9
What Peter said.
Except that foot-tapping does have me a little bit concerned.
Posted by: Mrs. Who at November 03, 2007 05:24 PM (mXFQ3)
10
I don't care one way or the other.
It's a book.
Posted by: wRitErsbLock at November 03, 2007 09:04 PM (0Pi1o)
11
Hey Peter (et al),
Statistics bear out that if your child or grandchild is sexually molested, it will more likely be by someone who is 1) heterosexual and 2) trusted by that child.
The old "gay ppl! They molest the children!" is a stereotype that is blatantly false.
Posted by: Prose Hack at November 04, 2007 04:42 PM (rI1Qq)
