April 17, 2006
TODAY'S LOVE NOTE
(
Introduction)
Those times we are temporarily holding each other close are the times I would like to permanently stay.
(CAUTION: Romantics beware - comments may contain naughtiness)
[Like the Love Notes? Get the e-book]
Posted by: Harvey at
09:15 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 33 words, total size 1 kb.
TODAY'S GRAFFITI CURRENCY
(
Introduction)
(click to enlarge)
[(dollar with American Flag design]
The Treasury's new dollar bill design was rejected due to concerns that it might offend Arabs, illegal immigrants, and stupid people.
Posted by: Harvey at
09:14 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 31 words, total size 1 kb.
1
OH COOOOOL! See, now
*that's* inspired art.
Posted by: shimauma at April 17, 2006 10:58 AM (oH+XM)
2
No, that's called boredom in the classroom. Though it is well done.
Posted by: Andrew Ravencroft at April 17, 2006 11:42 AM (o+sy7)
3
I like it.
Posted by: Richmond at April 18, 2006 08:29 AM (e8QFP)
4
I like it a lot. If I ever feel the need to dramatically grafitti my currency, I'll do it.
Posted by: wRitErsbLock at April 18, 2006 01:51 PM (yHahS)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
GO NAVY!
Jim of
Parkway Rest Stop offers a link to
a video slideshow demonstrating the dozens of different things the Navy can send your way to kill you if you're dumb enough to make terrorist noises in the general direction of the US.
Hope the Iranians were paying attention. Last time they f'd with the USN, they had 8 boats go to Davy Jones.
Posted by: Harvey at
07:44 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 67 words, total size 1 kb.
April 15, 2006
TODAY'S LOVE NOTE
(
Introduction)
When you're not here, something's missing...
My smile.
(CAUTION: Romantics beware - comments may contain naughtiness)
[Like the Love Notes? Get the e-book]
Posted by: Harvey at
09:41 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 23 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Are you sure that's not just gas?
Posted by: Kermit at April 16, 2006 05:28 AM (RTy2V)
2
When you are here, something else is missing... your clothes.
Posted by: GEBIV at April 16, 2006 10:41 AM (CCh5P)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
HOW LONG SHOULD YOU KISS THE BRIDE?
I've been to a few weddings in the last couple of years, and I've always found myself raising an eyebrow at the "kiss the bride" segment, because the kisses were short, perfunctory, and absent of all but the most token passion.
By contrast, during my own wedding ceremony, the nuptual buss was long, deep, and enthusiastic. When it was finally finished, the minister's first words were "you may now STOP kissing the bride" (seriously, we've got it on tape).
So, how was YOUR wedding kiss?
If it was short, was it just because you were nervous, or maybe just intimidated by the throng of witnesses?
Also, do you think there's any correlation between the enthusiasm of the wedding kiss and the longevity of the ensuing marriage?
Posted by: Harvey at
05:38 PM
| Comments (18)
| Add Comment
Post contains 140 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I don't know about the correlation thing, I think we did that later that evenin', but, after 17 years, I'm still kissin' her... ass.
Posted by: RedNeck at April 15, 2006 05:48 PM (tSJ8V)
2
Never had the fortune to have my own wedding... but at one of my brother's wedding, we had a fire-extinguisher hidden behind the pulpit in case the kiss went on too long. Unfortunately, we didn't need to use it.
Posted by: GEBIV at April 15, 2006 09:03 PM (dmjxv)
3
My fiance and I practiced our 'you may kiss the bride kiss' before the wedding. We both agreed that in front of a church full of family with the minister looking on was no place for some hot tongue action. Our kiss was on the lips for... 1, 2, 3 and release!
You have the rest of your life to swap tongues with your spouse. Show some class and don't do it in church.
Posted by: Barry at April 16, 2006 12:41 AM (kKjaJ)
4
There was tongue involved!
Posted by: Quality Weenie at April 16, 2006 10:51 AM (BksWB)
5
I barely remember - but I think it was short and of the "let's do this quick and get the hell out of here variety". My husband and I hated our wedding. The families (on both sides) made the whole thing a nightmare. So, while I am very happy to be married to him - I just cringe whenever I look back at that day. We don't even look at the pictures if we can help it.
I figure that day has been the low point of our marriage - that means it's gotten better every year since then. *grin*
Posted by: Teresa at April 16, 2006 12:07 PM (FZwDL)
6
I had a very large and formal wedding. A long kiss with tongue action would have brought on some serious frowns from both sides of the family, I feel certain. But I'm not into overt public displays of affection like that in general, so it was never something that was considered. It was more of a romantic gentle, lingering kiss... not quite 1,2,3, but not passionate where I'd want to avert my eyes from the TWO priests that were conducting our ceremony.
Posted by: Bou at April 16, 2006 09:18 PM (iHxT3)
7
I think our kiss was short because we were nervous, plus the minister had us holding both hands, so leaning forward over our own hands was awkward and we were both too spooked to let go for a good EMBRACE. We had to make up for it later.
Posted by: shimauma at April 17, 2006 06:54 AM (oH+XM)
8
We had a good kiss. Not too short but not eliciting any frowns either. I was just relieved to be married...
Posted by: Richmond at April 17, 2006 10:51 AM (e8QFP)
9
We just re-watched our wedding video for Valentine's Day this year (approaching our 5th anniversary in a little more than a month)... Our kiss was relatively short, but there was definitely tongue involved. I noticed it when I watched the video - it didn't occur to me at the time how obvious it would be or we might have tried to be more discreet I suppose.
Posted by: songstress7 at April 18, 2006 12:59 AM (0zDjn)
10
Kiss? What? You are supposed to KISS after the ceremony?
I knew I forgot something....
Oh yeah, the ceremony!
Posted by: Rave at April 18, 2006 08:20 AM (Fir0Z)
11
That hot and heavy stuff is what the wedding NIGHT is for, I'd say.
Posted by: Ogre at April 18, 2006 09:10 AM (/k+l4)
12
Ogre - yeah, but it's never too early for warm-ups :-)
Posted by: Harvey at April 18, 2006 10:21 AM (L7a63)
13
I think our kiss was just long enough. We're not big on PDA. I don't recall being nervous (because I slammed an airplane-size bottle of vodka/empty tummy). We got married on Halloween. I was the traditional bride, but hubby wore a real straight jacket and a plastic ball n chain. Best man was the grim reaper (because we all know marriage = death!). Most guests, as requested, came in costume. Nothing traditional about our wedding other than my gown. Even the tier cake was halloween themed!
Posted by: wRitErsbLock at April 18, 2006 02:02 PM (yHahS)
14
http://heavens4gate4download.blogspot.com heavens gate: download heavens gate, heavens gate, heavens gate mp3. More link http://heavens4gate4download.blogspot.com heavens gate here. Top sites.
Posted by: heavens gate at April 23, 2006 12:38 AM (/BK4F)
15
http://paralysed4age4download.blogspot.com paralysed age: download paralysed age, paralysed age, paralysed age mp3. More link http://paralysed4age4download.blogspot.com paralysed age here. Web site!
Posted by: paralysed age at April 23, 2006 12:41 AM (KKPBL)
16
http://pharmarkg.virtualave.net/data/bextra/ bextra online: buy bextra, generic bextra, order bextra. Also http://pharmarkg.virtualave.net/data/bextra/ order bextra here. Free web sites:
Posted by: bextra online at May 01, 2006 11:38 AM (JGZc4)
17
http:// : empty. http:// here. Hello guys.
Posted by: at May 08, 2006 11:28 AM (PWy7L)
18
I went back for seconds.
Posted by: GaMongrel at May 18, 2006 06:52 PM (tYXgL)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
THE MUSICAL GUIDE TO BRA SIZES (aka THE NEW ALPHABET SONG)
Sent to me by Blogson _Jon of
We Swear.
If Janet Jackson's Superbowl appearance offended you, you probably don't want to watch this.
Posted by: Harvey at
11:49 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 45 words, total size 1 kb.
1
okay, you certainly set the bad example standards in this blogfamily . . .
Posted by: Andrew Ravencroft at April 15, 2006 04:41 PM (o+sy7)
2
Heck man, I found it very edumacational. I was confused about that qrstuv thing, but I think with some practice I can figure it out.
Thanks!
Posted by: RedNeck at April 15, 2006 05:51 PM (tSJ8V)
3
awwww shucks!
There I go, getting linked to again.
btw, I made a comment here:
http://curmudgeonlyskeptical.blogspot.com/2006/04/re-whiny-illegal-conquistadors-heres.html
and he turned it into another post - pretty funny. I seem to be good at this.
Posted by: _Jon at April 16, 2006 07:32 AM (AqumQ)
4
You don't see that one in kindergarden very often...
Posted by: Ogre at April 18, 2006 09:18 AM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 14, 2006
TODAY'S LOVE NOTE
(
Introduction)
I love your passion, you make me respond so easily. I feel your touch. I become so alive at the sound of your voice. I want to lay beside you 'til the end of time.
(CAUTION: Romantics beware - comments may contain naughtiness)
[Like the Love Notes? Get the e-book]
Posted by: Harvey at
08:17 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 50 words, total size 1 kb.
TODAY'S GRAFFITI CURRENCY
(
Introduction)
(click to enlarge)
[Good Luck]
Question: What's 6.25 inches long and can help you get lucky?
Posted by: Harvey at
08:13 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 21 words, total size 1 kb.
PUTTING MINIMAL EFFORT INTO IT
Blogson Blue Tige
tagged me with a meme that
I already did, which technically means I'm free to ignore it.
However, after reading this post by blogdaughter Boudicca of Skippy's Voice, I found a suitable Google Image:
Googled "hoop jumping", without quotes.
Yeah, wrong gender, but that "you've gotta be f-ing kidding me" look on his face is perfect.
Posted by: Harvey at
08:12 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 69 words, total size 1 kb.
1
ROFLMAO! Holy crap. That's GREAT!! heh heh heh.
Posted by: Bou at April 14, 2006 08:51 PM (iHxT3)
Posted by: vw bug at April 15, 2006 05:32 AM (0LvyK)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Reuters Maintains Journalistic Standards
(
A Precision Guided Humor Assignment cross-posted from
IMAO)
In their eagerness to shout "Dismal failure!" about the war, the Reuters news service blindly swallowed claims by Iraqi terrorists that they had video footage of them capturing a downed helicopter.
Well, they DID have footage - unfortunately the time stamp on it was March 19, 2000, and it was probably of a helicopter crash in Afghanistan.
So I guess I shouldn't have been TOO surprised over their coverage of the latest criticisms of Donald Rumsfeld (in the extended entry)...
more...
Posted by: Harvey at
08:05 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 116 words, total size 2 kb.
April 13, 2006
TODAY'S LOVE NOTE
(
Introduction)
When you are so far away, I only think of the moment when I'll hold you in my arms... and breathe in your love, exhaling the purity of our souls combining together.
(CAUTION: Romantics beware - comments may contain naughtiness)
[Like the Love Notes? Get the e-book]
Posted by: Harvey at
04:29 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 47 words, total size 1 kb.
1
...and, unfortunately, a bit of a fishy smell...
Posted by: Harvey at April 13, 2006 04:30 PM (L7a63)
2
I must've squeezed to hard. Your love smells like a fart.
Posted by: GaMongrel at April 14, 2006 07:42 AM (tYXgL)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
TODAY'S GRAFFITI CURRENCY
(
Introduction)
(click to enlarge)
[Roy [smiley face]]
Presidential Fun Fact:
George Washington had a Cheshire Cat named Roy.
Posted by: Harvey at
04:25 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 22 words, total size 1 kb.
NEVER GOT AN INSTALANCHE
(
with apologies to Dr. Hook & the Medicine Show for abusing their song "Cover of the Rolling Stone")
Well, I'm a small-time blogger
Not a big link-monger
But adored by everyone I know
I write about boobies and I write about love
But for it I got nothin' to show
I get all kinds of links from both heroes & finks
But the link that would make me dance
Is the link from Glenn to which I'd say "Amen"
But I've never got an Instalanche
(Instalanche) Wanna see my Sitemeter spikin'
('lanche) Wanna feel like Glenn's taking a likin'
('lanche) Wanna see my server crash
But I've never got an Instalanche
I got a freaky site design with a currency shrine
Just full of "I Grew Hemp"-stamped bills
I got love notes in my archives
Givin' the ladies thrills
Now, it's all designed to blow your mind
But the mind with which I've had no chance
Is the mind of Glenn - king of blogging men
'Cuz I've never got an Instalanche
(Instalanche) Wanna see my Sitemeter spikin'
('lanche) Wanna feel like Glenn's taking a likin'
('lanche) Wanna see my server crash
'Cuz I've never got an Instalanche
I got a lot of fanatical blog-tip groupies
Who do anything I say
I got a genuine tech-support Guru
Who helps keep the spam at bay
I got all the friends that linkage can buy
Who laugh when I make fun of France
I keep writin' & thinkin' but I can't get Glenn's linkin'
I've just never got an Instalanche
(Instalanche) Wanna see my Sitemeter spikin'
('lanche) Wanna feel like Glenn's taking a likin'
('lanche) Wanna see my server crash
I've just never got an Instalanche
Will I *ever* get an Instalanche?
(Man, I don't know why I ain't gotten an Instalanche, Baby)
(I'm a beautiful blogger)
(I ain't kiddin', why, I'd make the perfect link for Instapundit)
(Fresh link, top of the page, man)
(I can see it now, I'll be up on top of Technorati)
(Instalanche, man ...... ahh, beautiful!)
Posted by: Harvey at
09:56 AM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 348 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Did you take your own advice and send an email to the puppy-blending maniac?
Good cover, btw. I was just listening to the original on the way in to work this morning.
Posted by: physics geek at April 13, 2006 11:05 AM (Xvrs7)
2
Yes.
Yes I did :-)
And you DO know what happened to Dr. Hook after that song hit the charts, right?
Posted by: Harvey at April 13, 2006 12:30 PM (L7a63)
3
Really, really good Harvey! And did Dr. Hook make the cover after that song hit?
Posted by: Richmond at April 13, 2006 12:57 PM (e8QFP)
4
Richmond - the answer lies below
http://www.dtmagazine.com/cmopg1924/rs1.html
Posted by: Harvey at April 13, 2006 01:14 PM (L7a63)
5
Good work on the song. I can't believe that after all this time you still haven't had your dream 'lanche.
Posted by: Contagion at April 13, 2006 04:58 PM (e8b4J)
6
Ha ha. Your generation and your songs.
My dad likes that song.
Interesting fact though, if you didn't know, Shel Silverstein wrote that one. Along with that song about raindrops from before my time, and that song that Johnny Cash did all those years before he covered Nine Inch Nail's Hurt.
I'm not that familiar with any of this stuff, but I guess you might know about it. Being old and all.
Posted by: Joey at April 13, 2006 07:36 PM (JXgKx)
7
Also, I'm not sure, but I think Silverstein wrote another Dr. Hook song that I'm not familiar with: Queen of the Silver Dollar.
But I'm not entirely sure about that, and I don't feel like researching music that you and my dad listen to right now.
Geezers.
Posted by: Joey at April 13, 2006 07:44 PM (JXgKx)
8
Joey - That's COOT to you, punk! :-P
Posted by: Harvey at April 13, 2006 10:20 PM (L7a63)
9
Poor Dr Hook. They might have gone somewhere had they not hates each other
Best I can do for you is a Techo-Lanche which will get you...uh....4 more readers a blind guy and a mouse named Pedro.
But I'll try!
Posted by: BloodSpite at April 15, 2006 07:26 AM (ZTGJT)
Posted by: Harvey at April 15, 2006 08:30 AM (L7a63)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
DOES IT DO ANY GOOD TO EMAIL HIGH-TRAFFIC BLOGGERS? - UPDATED 4-14-06 7PM
(Following up on
this post)
SUMMARY:
Yes.
How?
Be brief, be polite, and only submit links that clearly fit the high-traffic blog's theme. Ask yourself, "am I certain that [high-traffic blogger's] readers would be interested in this?"
Also, don't be offended if you don't hear back. Your e-mail was very likely read, but only so many of the dozens or hundreds received every day can be responded to. Don't take it personally. It's just that there are only so many hours in a day that can be spent writing, and those have to be split between answering e-mails & blogging.
Last week I took
my own advice and e-mailed 30 high-traffic bloggers as follows:
SUBJ:What's the best way to send an e-mail that you'll read? (short, no reply required)
First, please forgive the unsolicited e-mail, but I'm doing some research for a post on blogging, and I'm hoping you can help me.
Someone recently remarked to me that bloggers with high-traffic sites don't read e-mails from - or link to - anyone except other high traffic bloggers. I don't think that's true. I think it's more a matter of having a tactful approach, and I wrote a post saying as much:
http://badexample.mu.nu/archives/166595.php
Now, I'm sure you have other subjects to write about, and if you have no interest in this topic, I understand completely, so there's no need to act on this e-mail at all if you don't want to.
However, it occurs to me that you probably get dozens of annoying "please link this" e-mails every day. Discussing my post would give you a perfect excuse to school your readers on the art of sending you short, on-topic, useful e-mails instead of rambling junk - a topic that would normally be off-theme for your blog.
Whether you decide to link to my post or not, you have my express permission to quote this e-mail in full or in part.
I thank you for your time.
Sincerely,
Harvey Olson
Bad Example
http://badexample.mu.nu/
Since this experiment was all about site traffic, I did NOT limit myself based on a blog's political leanings, so I tapped a few of the big left-wing bloggers, too, as well as a couple blogs devoted to celebrity gossip.
However, I was most interested in seeing whether a "cold-calling" e-mail technique would work, so I *did* go out of my way to avoid bloggers who might actually recognize me and link me as a personal favor, thus no Blackfive, IMAO, or Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler.
Here's what happened:
Instapundit - Replied to my e-mail within minutes. Said that getting your e-mail read is a matter of timing - if he's away from his computer for a few hours, he gets too backlogged to even try to catch up.
Protein Wisdom - Replied promptly, saying he *does* read e-mails and responds if he has time.
AMERICAblog - Prompt reply, and I found one passage particularly enlightening as to why high-traffic blogs sometimes seem to be a closed society "I usually rely on emails from my readers for suggestions for links. And, big surprise, they usually send me links from the top blogs."
For some reason, I'd failed to consider that blogless readers send links, too, but I can certainly see how 10 e-mails that say "Look what Kos posted!" might carry more weight than a single "please link me".
VodkaPundit - Prompt reply AND a Vodkalanche! WHOO-HOO! Anyway, Stephen falls into the "don't have time to read it all, or respond to it, but I try" category. So it would appear that one key to getting your e-mail read is a subject line that's intriguing, yet doesn't sound like spam.
Right Wing News - Linked the same day. Also, he did what I had hoped - used the opportunity to share his own thoughts on e-mailing & site traffic in a thoughtful post. This is about as good as it gets when you send a link. Also, check his comments section for some good discussion.
UPDATE 4-14-06 7PM:
Outside the Beltway - linked the same day, and took the opportunity to add his own thoughts about how to get noticed. #4 surprised me a bit:
4. Make it easy. Give the blogger a two or three sentence–max–summary of the post if it’s long. Include a link to the post. Include the entire text of the post. Unless they are regular readers of your site and you have some sort of relationship, simply sending along a link to the post with the expectation that they will click through is not a great idea.
My initial thought was that including the full text would make the e-mail longer and thus less likely to be read. However, James is right. Saving your target reader the click and the wait for the page-load errs on the side of convenience. My suggestion is to put the text at the very end of the e-mail, AFTER the summary, the link, and (optionally) why you think the high-traffic blogger might be interested in the post.
(Note on the update: the trackback from OTB didn't work, and I didn't check to see if he'd posted on it. I apologize for the oversight)
Hugh Hewitt - Linked the same day, however I noticed that he also gave a Hat Tip to Right Wing News. Which makes me wonder whether he was planning to link me before he read the RWN piece, or if the fact that RWN blogged about it made him to decide not to dump my e-mail into his bozo bin. Either way, I'm happy. But this also makes me wonder what the "tipping point" is. How many high-traffic bloggers have to link a post before they all feel compelled to do it so that they don't miss out on a "hot topic"? Ah... the mysteries of interpersonal influence...
I'll also mention that although Hugh didn't reply to my initial e-mail, he DID reply to my "thank you" e-mail that I sent after he linked me.
Wonkette - Linked same day, later in the evening, and mentioned that if a high-traffic blogger isn't responding to your e-mail, it may be because you got caught in their spam filter. Lesson learned - don't brag about how your were born in Nigeria.
Seriously, though, you know what spam e-mails look like, so avoid ALL CAPS, excessive linkage, exclamation points!!!, and other filter triggers.
QandO - Responded after about 24 hours. He brought up an excellent point about why some of the more content-oriented blogs (rather than link-oriented) might not be quick to jump on your link: "I rarely link emailed stuff, simply because of my own blogging habits. I tend to write about subjects that I've been thinking about, or about which I have something unique to say. I don't really consider myself a "linker". So, unfortunately, while it's nice for me to get emailed links, I'm probably not terribly helpful to the people who send them. Usually, anyway."
I have to agree - if I can't find a fresh angle on a story, I may not post on a link I've been sent. I mean, if I can't manage to do more than echo the A-listers' opinions, I probably can't muster the enthusiasm to whip up a post on the topic - which is why I don't do a whole lot of blogging on the big headline news stories of the day.
Winds of Change - Linked after about 44 hours. Mentions the Right Wing News piece, mostly for RWN's great money quote of "Getting links isn't about a "Good Old Boy's Club," it's about the numbers game."
Here's something to consider. Right Wing News wrote a better post than I did (I'm being honest, not modest), but I still got a link and praise in the WoC piece. When it comes to crediting sources, I usually only mention the place I got the info from. I almost never cite "the source of the source". I wonder if WoC would've linked me (source of the source) had he not also gotten the e-mail?... again - the mysteries of influence.
UPDATE 4-13-06 5PM: Joe of WoC was kind enough to leave an explanation in the comments, and also points out that linking the source of the source helps improve the shelf life of your post should one of the source links eventually become broken.
The Jawa Report - First, my condolences to Rusty Shackleford on the recent loss of his friend. I would like to give him credit for setting his contact e-mail to autorespond, so I heard about this within minutes of sending my initial e-mail. To his further credit, he responded personally at about the 48 hour mark, to let me know that he's a "reads all, responds to some" kinda guy.
The Real Ugly American - Not one of the initial e-mail targets, but he posted within 12 hours as a secondary effect of the links by Right Wing News and Hugh Hewitt, and added his own thoughts to expand my "how to e-mail high-traffic bloggers" advice to make it inclusive of ALL bloggers.
The following are the
19 18 high-traffic blogs which neither replied to my e-mail nor linked my post. This does not in any way affect my opinion of them. I simply assume that they had more urgent matters to attend to. Had I sent my e-mails at a different time or on a different day, the lists above and below probably would've looked completely different. Maybe I'll have more fortuitous timing in the future.
Daily Kos
Pink Is The New Blog
Michelle Malkin
Eschaton
Go Fug Yourself
Crooks and Liars
A Socialite's Life
Little Green Footballs
Powerline
The Dilbert Blog
NRO: The Corner
Lileks
Roger L. Simon
Captain's Quarters
Outside the Beltway
Ace of Spades
This Modern World
Belmont Club
Althouse
Posted by: Harvey at
09:18 AM
| Comments (20)
| Add Comment
Post contains 1663 words, total size 12 kb.
1
Great post Harvey. I have been waiting to see this follow up. thank you for the link.
Blog on!
Posted by: The Ugly American at April 13, 2006 10:16 AM (a+JK3)
2
I've gotten a link from Malkin....
NEENER, NEENER, NEENER!!
Posted by: Graumagus at April 13, 2006 12:53 PM (m4jdv)
3
Actually, me too.
Don't they feel great? :-)
Posted by: Harvey at April 13, 2006 12:58 PM (L7a63)
4
This insight may help. I received your email at Winds of Change.NET, and mentally filed it in the "interesting" category because Winds sees meta-posts about blogging, social networks, et. al. as part of what we're about. A minor part, but definitely there.
The thing is, time is limited and sometimes I find myself focused on longer posts in order to clarify my thinking and get them out. Which means not everything on my "interesting" list makes it to my blog. This is a chronic regret, but largely unsolvable. It's also why my inbox grows a bit each day and is now over 3,000 items. Must do something about that.
Anyway, I stumbled across the RWN piece just as I was opreparing to do a short bit. RWN was better, but having received the email (and indeed, given the subject under discussion) I thought it appropriate to link back to your original post as well.
We often do "Hat Tip" links on Winds, but this was a bit above. I'm doing it more and more, however, largely because blogs shut down, change software and hence all link URLs, etc. Having two explicit links addressing a subject thus improves the longevity of the information I post.
Posted by: Joe Katzman at April 13, 2006 01:45 PM (s7QFH)
Posted by: vw bug at April 13, 2006 06:37 PM (0LvyK)
6
Next time you write to those heavy-hitters, please tell what a fine fellow I am.
Posted by: Jim - PRS at April 13, 2006 06:52 PM (njBz/)
7
Well, Harvey, I guess this settles the age-old question: is Harvey a whore?
Posted by: Laurence Simon at April 14, 2006 10:49 AM (uBCxH)
8
I've found your advice to be spot on.
"Be brief, be polite, and only submit links that clearly fit the high-traffic blog's theme."
It's gratifying to get a topic of imporance to you mentioned by a high-traffic blog, but it's always a thrill to get the hat-tip. Sort of like getting a letter in the newspaper.
Even though I don't have my own blog, I've lead several blogs to interesting tid-bits that were then subjects of their own posts. And then commented on them.
Posted by: Keith, Indy at April 14, 2006 12:01 PM (pVUxX)
9
Oh yeah, and hat tip to Pajamas Media for linking this article...
Posted by: Keith, Indy at April 14, 2006 12:02 PM (pVUxX)
10
And this just in...
http://www.qando.net/details.aspx?Entry=3723
Posted by: Keith, Indy at April 14, 2006 12:05 PM (pVUxX)
11
The rules aren't completely set in stone. I got instalanched even though I used to be a member of the Alliance of Free Blogs. According to some bloggers out there, Glenn Reynolds won't link you if you're a member. Wasn't the case with me.
Posted by: MikeT at April 14, 2006 12:09 PM (itu63)
12
Laurence - I am NOT a whore... I am a "purveyor of intimate transactions" :-)
Mike - Alliance membership is essentially irrelevant to Instalanching. IMAO gets links all the time, and Glenn has a good sense of humor about the whole thing. Remember, he *did* try to join the Alliance himself back in September of '03:
http://www.instapundit.com/archives/011513.php
Posted by: Harvey at April 14, 2006 02:04 PM (L7a63)
13
I actually
linked and posted on the subject shortly after getting the email. I couldn't get the trackback to work.
Posted by: James Joyner at April 14, 2006 03:09 PM (duCq5)
14
Are you Wisconsin based?
Posted by: Marcus Aurelius at April 14, 2006 03:40 PM (43BLH)
15
I'm not a high-traffic blog, but I do link to most of the stuff I'm pitched unless (like others) I get bogged down and your email drifts down past the first page or two of my inbox. I even get pitched by some of the bigger bloggers.
I definitely limit my own pitches to posts where I really came up with something new, and I keep track of who links, and stop bugging the ones who never do (cough, Powerline, cough!).
Posted by: Brainster at April 14, 2006 04:30 PM (pCPyL)
16
Hey Harvs,
http://www.memeorandum.com/060414/p72#a060414p72
Have a nice day!
Posted by: Jake Jacobsen at April 14, 2006 06:24 PM (hltlb)
17
Marcus - Yes
Jake - I noticed that in my referer logs a couple minutes ago. Does this make me a rock star? :-)
Posted by: Harvey at April 14, 2006 08:32 PM (L7a63)
18
Cool!
I am Appleton based and contribute to the Badger Blog Alliance.
Posted by: Marcus Aurelius at April 15, 2006 01:04 PM (43BLH)
19
Good design!
http://jodfpyiq.com/uzso/vnlc.html | http://ypsiipqi.com/erhe/yruw.html
Posted by: Phillip at May 04, 2006 11:13 PM (2pYcY)
20
Hm, it is very coo site only for sweet people!
Posted by: ANGIE at June 16, 2006 06:49 AM (4jB9D)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
AN OPEN LETTER TO COMEDY CENTRAL - UPDATED 4-17-06
Dear Comedy Central,
I watched South Park last night (Cartoon Wars, part 2), and I see you decided against airing the image of a cartoon Mohammed handing a salmon helmet to Peter Griffin. You were afraid that Muslims might be offended if they saw something like this:
(click to enlarge)
On the other hand, showing Jesus crapping on the American flag - you didn't have a problem with.
Huh... and to think that - back on July 4th, 2001 - you couldn't have cared less if South Park showed a cartoon image of Mohammed...
Something must've changed between then & now.
Well, I'm not going to make any idle squawkings about not watching Comedy Central any more. I like South Park.
On the other hand, I *did* take note of who bought air time during your capitulation to terrorist threats:
Axe Snake Peel
iPod + iTunes
NBA Ballers Phenom
"Fun With Dick and Jane" DVD
Netscape internet service
Amp'd mobile
eXmark LazerZ lawn mowers
Dell
Toyota Camry
"Scary Movie 4" DVD
Gametap
I don't suppose I'll be buying any of their products anytime soon.
Unless they find somewhere else to spend their advertising budget.
Or unless you re-run the episode uncensored.
Your call.
UPDATE 4-13-06 10:30AM: After reading some of the discussion threads on the South Park BBS, there appears to be some debate as to whether the episode was censored by Comedy Central or if the black screens were done by Matt & Trey to make a point.
Pending confirmation from either party, I think it was both. I don't think the black screens were inserted by Comedy Central in order to prevent the image of Mohammed from appearing, however, I *do* think that at some point CC had actually come out and told Matt & Trey directly that they would not show an image of Mohammed.
I'll speculate further by suggesting that, had CC approved the Mohammed image, Matt & Trey would've included it in the episode and used a different ending sequence. One that made Comedy Central look like defenders of free speech instead of hypocritical jackasses.
UPDATE 4-13-06 1:15PM: I'm giving myself a high-five for guessing correctly that it was both. Stephen Spruiell called CC and asked about the black screen containing the words "Comedy Central has refused to broadcast an image of Mohammed on their network". The response:
"They reflected it accurately. That was a Comedy Central decision."
Now we'll just wait & see how my further speculation pans out.
UPDATE 4-17-06: Don't threaten a boycott of Comedy Central. Threaten their advertisers instead. American Digest explains the principle behind this approach.
Posted by: Harvey at
12:23 AM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 454 words, total size 4 kb.
Posted by: Graumagus at April 13, 2006 10:31 AM (m4jdv)
2
BTW if anyone gives you any grief over posting a picture of that pedophile bastard, just remember that you have a hell of a lot of firepower a half hour south and a phone call away.
Posted by: Graumagus at April 13, 2006 10:38 AM (m4jdv)
3
I'm not worried - I've got a Koran that I can hold hostage & threaten to behead.
But I *do* appreciate the support :-)
Seriously, though, I expect this post will be as roundly ignored as my last Mohammed cartoon.
Posted by: Harvey at April 13, 2006 10:45 AM (L7a63)
4
Harv,
National Review
via Vox prove that this a CC censorship issue. I liked Vox's quote:
It seems pretty obvious now that the only effective resort Christians have in the face of the many blasphemers determined to mock their faith and their God is threaten to lop a few heads off.
Posted by: physics geek at April 13, 2006 11:21 AM (Xvrs7)
5
I wonder if my cartoon will be ignored....
Posted by: Graumagus at April 13, 2006 12:56 PM (m4jdv)
6
I was looking at the entry on the episode on Wikipedia, (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cartoon_Wars_Part_II) and they pointed out two things I both failed to notice, and had forgotten:
The first thing was that they *did* show the Prophet Muhammad. He's in the final scene of the opening. Apparently, he's been there since "Smug Alert."
And secondly, the fact that that wasn't the first time they showed him. He also appeared as one of the Super Best Friends.
Comedy Central didn't censor the image at all. It was done intentionally by Stone and Parker as a joke, like how in "Trapped in the Closet", they replaced all the credits with John/Jane Doe after Stan dared the Scientologists to sue him.
Posted by: Damien Hailey at April 14, 2006 08:00 AM (8Kulk)
7
Sigh. It was clearly part of the joke.
Let's see, here:
An entirely self-referential episode makes fun of both fundamentalists that are too uptight to recognize a harmless joke when they see one, and over-reactionary Americans that are too stupid to recognize a harmless joke when they see one.
And what do you know, a bunch right-wing douchebags turn out to be both!
Posted by: Tylonius at April 14, 2006 10:59 AM (e27jg)
8
Okay, I've seen some evidence that the Family Guy scene may have been censored after all. I may have to take that one part back.
Posted by: Damien Hailey at April 15, 2006 11:01 AM (8Kulk)
9
I proclaim and issue a fartwa on your nasty infidel ass!
Posted by: Imam Madfish ibn Willie at April 15, 2006 12:01 PM (lDcUQ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 12, 2006
FENCE FIRST, AMNESTY LATER
Mean Mr. Mustard's
solution to the illegal immigration problem.
Posted by: Harvey at
10:45 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 17 words, total size 1 kb.
1
If it's not exactly the same - it's certainly very close to what Charles Krauthammer has proposed in a recent column he wrote.
After all in the 80's we had Reagan doing an amnesty for 3 million or so. Now it's 11mil - give or take a couple. What next 50 mil? Why does anyone think that just giving amnesty is going to solve these problems? Without some sort of control set in place we may as well put up neon signs at every port of entry... C'mon in. Sheesh!
Posted by: Teresa at April 12, 2006 01:44 PM (FZwDL)
2
Seems simply enough...
which is why our feeble government won't even consider it.
Posted by: Ogre at April 13, 2006 05:52 AM (/k+l4)
3
We should build the wall - and I'm thinking Great Wall of China, not some piddly chain link affair - and then offer amnesty,
under the condition that anyone offered and taking amnesty WILL NOT BE ALLOWED TO VOTE - EVER!
Maybe that would shut the lib/dumbacrats the hell up, since the whole reason they want illegals to be legal is so they can vote Dem.
And clean their toilets, and raise thier kids, and wipe thier widdle arses....
I need another drink... :^P
Posted by: Wes at April 14, 2006 09:06 PM (XKQLY)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 11, 2006
TODAY'S LOVE NOTE
(
Introduction)
If I had a single flower for every time I think about you, I could walk forever in my garden.
(CAUTION: Romantics beware - comments may contain naughtiness)
[Like the Love Notes? Get the e-book]
Posted by: Harvey at
07:35 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 35 words, total size 1 kb.
1
...because I'd be walking in a circle around 3 wilted flowers...
Posted by: Harvey at April 11, 2006 07:36 PM (L7a63)
2
(laugh)
That is SOOOO COLD!
You are definitely going to Hell in a handbasket....full of wilted flowers!
Posted by: Rave at April 12, 2006 08:27 AM (Fir0Z)
3
but would you please mow your grass?
Posted by: GaMongrel at April 14, 2006 07:52 AM (tYXgL)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
TODAY'S GRAFFITI CURRENCY
(
Introduction)
(click to enlarge)
[Men Sux]
Actually, men like me prefer to *ahem* "lix".
Posted by: Harvey at
07:34 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 18 words, total size 1 kb.
92kb generated in CPU 0.0322, elapsed 0.1377 seconds.
86 queries taking 0.1185 seconds, 311 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.