March 07, 2007

ACADEMIC DISCUSSION OF AN AWKWARD TOPIC - STRAP ON YOUR THICK SKIN, PLEASE

Ann Coulter said:

"I was going to have a few comments on the other Democratic presidential candidate, John Edwards, but it turns out that you have to go into rehab if you use the word 'faggot,'..."

A lot of conservatives have repudiated Ann's remarks.

Ann herself, however, did not. She clarified them as follows:

"'Faggot isn't offensive to gays; it has nothing to do with gays," Coulter said on "Hannity and Colmes" Monday night. "It's a schoolyard taunt meaning 'wuss,' and unless you're telling me that John Edwards is gay, it was not applied to a gay person."

Well, since she's 45 years old, I imagine the first part of that is true for her. Being 40 years old myself, it certainly was for me. Although we inevitably shortened it to fag, since one-syllable insults somehow seem more insulting.

And let's not forget that in 1985, there was a #1 pop tune with a #1 pop video - Dire Straits "Money For Nothing" - that used the word "faggot" three times. How offensive could it possibly be?

Then there's the second point. John Edwards is NOT, in fact, gay.

Sure, he's a baby-faced man with delicate features and girlish mannerisms who stars in a YouTube video where he fusses over his hair like a supermodel, but he is NOT gay.

So Ann says it's not a gay epithet, because the target obviously isn't gay, and everyone knows he's not gay.

Fair enough - but let's take it to the next level.

Would it be ok to call John Edwards a nigger because he's not black?

"I was going to have a few comments on the other Democratic presidential candidate, John Edwards, but it turns out that you have to go into rehab if you use the word 'nigger,'..."

Well, that one's probably indefensible, since - while "nigger" is frequently used to describe gansta-thug rap artists in their own songs and videos - John Edwards has never rapped, pimped, or worn excessive bling, so it's hard to pass it off as a joke, because in order for something to be funny, it needs an element of truth.

Might work for Dennis Kucinich or Dick Gephart, though.

But how about this - checking my dictionary, one of the meanings of "nigger" is "Used as a disparaging term for a member of any socially, economically, or politically deprived group of people: 'Gun owners are the new niggers . . . of society' (John Aquilino)."

Would it be ok to call John Edwards a nigger because he's not deprived?

Something like "I'm not going to talk smack about John Edwards, because I just feel so sorry for him. Big house, millions of dollars, but when it comes to running for the Whitehouse, he's just a nigger."

Personally, I wouldn't go there, because when I skewer folks with political humor, I try to make it as accurate and unambiguous as possible. Using a term that can be construed to make a point that you are not, in fact, trying to make, is just sloppy communications. It's always better to say exactly what you mean.

So maybe Ann IS a verbal-bomb-throwing lunatic who should be shunned by conservatives as a too-pricey political liability, but then again, maybe she just really sucks as a humorist and desperately needs to hire herself a speech writer.

You make the call.

Posted by: Harvey at 09:49 AM | Comments (18) | Add Comment
Post contains 587 words, total size 4 kb.

<< Page 1 of 1 >>
27kb generated in CPU 0.0153, elapsed 0.0847 seconds.
69 queries taking 0.0746 seconds, 180 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.