Lynn of A Sweet, Familiar Dissonance is contemplating the unpopularity of the dollar coin.

"people aren't rejecting the dollar coin because of who is on it. They are rejecting it because, first of all, old habits are hard to change, second, people prefer dollar bills and finally, possibly most important, most of us have never even seen one of the darn things except in magazine ads selling them for twenty or thirty dollars each as "collectors' items""

I'd like to add that it's not just the "we have a choice and we prefer bills" issue, there's an infrastructure issue, too. A lot of vending machines don't take dollar coins, and - here's the biggie - cash drawers at most supermarket checkouts don't have a slot for them. Which is the same reason for the unpopularity of the half-dollar. In the cases where cash drawers DO have a 5th slot, it's already designated for half-dollars.

By the way, if anyone out there works at a checkout, please comment about how you handle halves and dollar coins.

In the comments to her post, Lynn wonders why she never sees half dollars anymore. Well, in addition to the above problems, there's also the fact that a half weighs the same as two quarters. So besides being inconvenient to use, there's no weight benefit to carrying one, either. Unlike, say, the advantage of 1 nickel to 5 pennies, or 1 dime to 2 nickels.

By the way, if for some reason you WOULD like to get some half dollars, just ask for them the next time you're at the bank. One of the tellers probably has a few she'd like to get rid of - since she doesn't have any place to put them.

Posted by: Harvey at 10:36 AM | Comments (10) | Add Comment
Post contains 298 words, total size 2 kb.

1 Maybe the dollar coin would work IF they did It right, theres talk of phasing out the penny once those are pulled from circulation...Oh and get rid of those F@ckin fifty cent pieces too these are MORE useless then the penny....sorry i drifted there for a minute. Now those two are out of the way start pulling the dollar bill out and start pushing a dollar coin into circulation preferibly somthing with Washingtons face and in double height letters accross the top ONE DOLLAR. Don't give the vending machine companys a choice, I think thats part of whats holding back a sucsessful change from paper to coin, as long as the paper bills around why would they spend the money to upgrade there machines to use a NEW coin that may not last the year??

Posted by: Blogless Brother at February 23, 2007 12:07 PM (Gm3j4)

2 I like to get the dollar coins as much as possible. I leave them as tips at the bar. It bugs the dickens out of the bar-gal, but not too much cause I tend to tip well. Australia uses both one and two dollar coins. They can not be mistaken for any of their other coins. Their half is huge by the way, and they use a lot of them.

Posted by: Skul at February 23, 2007 12:47 PM (3/Pql)

3 If you stuff a stripper's G-string with coins it will throw off her balance and cause her to fly off the pole, injuring herself and others. Just say no to dollar coins: Think of the strippers!

Posted by: Graumagus at February 23, 2007 12:52 PM (DrRYD)

4 Yes but what of smaller busted strippers?? they could get hollow Implants and put there tips in them...It'll give the term "money bags" new meaning

Posted by: Blogless Brother at February 23, 2007 01:22 PM (vSzrA)

5 Are there any other denominations in more than one form? There aren't two kinds of quarter dollars. There aren't two kinds of five dollar pieces. Why add a different form of dollar? The paper one works fine. Instead of eliminating the penny to advance the dollar coin, you'd actually have to eliminate the dollar bill to promote the dollar coin. That, and you'd have to redesign the g-string.

Posted by: Roses at February 23, 2007 09:28 PM (+WckC)

6 I've already had one friend nearly hospitalized by a strippers boobs in his face, now you want to pack them with coins??

Posted by: Graumagus at February 24, 2007 11:10 AM (DrRYD)

7 I hate both the half & the full dollar because it weighs more. I hate the silver full dollar even more becuase its shape resembles that of a quarter.

Posted by: michele at February 24, 2007 01:12 PM (SzW/m)

8 And... let's be honest... Susan B. Anthony was a bit butch, and it's possible to mistake her portrait for Washington's during a quick glance.

Posted by: Harvey at February 24, 2007 01:28 PM (L7a63)

9 The perils of being old...I remember silver dollars from back when they were silver. Coins have their uses. Ever try to bust somebody in the beezer with a roll of dollar bills? A roll of quarters or those new dollars works a lot better.

Posted by: Peter at February 26, 2007 01:29 AM (kkQ1n)

10 As one who traveled to Canada way to much for business in the brief 2 months I worked for GM having all coins and no paper money sucks. I had a pocket full of coins and it was heavy so I would take the coins out then have to break paper money again and I ended up with 10 lbs worth of Canadian money. Paper money makes more sense as it is much lighter in weight.

Posted by: Quality Weenie at February 26, 2007 10:46 AM (BksWB)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Most TV opinion shows have the decency to have at least one person from each side of the issue they're discussing. When they don't, it makes them look a little catty.

Like this clip from Paula Zahn's show that I found via Hot Air (and an e-mail from Frank J. of IMAO), where they discussed their final solution to the atheist problem without having an atheist on the panel.

First, ya gotta love those big, yellow, hornets'-nest-stirring questions in the background:

"Why do atheists inspire such hatred?"

and

"Are atheistic tactics too militant?"

Jerks.

Anyway, it occurs to me that just as non-terrorist Muslims need to speak out, condemn, and separate themselves from the splodey-dope lunatics who claim to be members of the same religion, I - as a tolerant, sane, non-evangelical atheist - need to do the same thing.

When people talk about atheists, they usually think about the frothing, blasphemous, God-hating, religion-mockers. People who write screedy, antagonistic diatribes like Russ of Pam's House Blend.

I just don't understand that stuff.

I think most people agree that in-your-face Christian evangelicals can be annoying with their constant fretting about the state of your soul, and their polite-but-condescending invitations to Bible studies. It's like having your 70-year-old mother who lives in another state calling you before you go to work to remind you to take an umbrella because the Weather Channel says it looks like rain.

Thanks for caring, but really, I'm good, here.

But why should atheists adopt the same tactic, going out of their way to antagonize Christians? It's a waste of time. You're not going to de-convert anyone. Try doing something productive with your life.

Personally, I'm not so insecure about my lack of religious beliefs that I feel the need to sway people to my way of thinking, and I'm not afraid of or offended by the little scraps of Christianity that poke their heads up in day to day living, like having "IN GOD WE TRUST" on the back of my currency. Let's face it, no one's ever said to me "You must be a Christian because the money you're spending professes trust in a deity".

And just because I don't believe in God doesn't mean I think that "love thy neighbor" and "do unto others" must automatically be bad advice. I believe in wisdom, regardless of the source. I just don't believe in miracles.

So you go ahead and worship your God, and I'll go ahead and not worship mine, and as long as neither one of us are obnoxious about it, I don't see any reason why we all can't get along.

Posted by: Harvey at 09:55 AM | Comments (15) | Add Comment
Post contains 450 words, total size 3 kb.

1 I consider myself an agnostic instead of an atheist, simply because nobody's been able to conclusively prove to me there ISN'T a god either. That said, I tend to judge people's religious beliefs by the extent that they leave me the fuck alone. If you want to believe that I'll burn for eternity, fine, have fun imagining my suffering: I don't give a shit. When you start passing laws based of your beliefs that affect my lifestyle (IE: Bullshit "no liquor before noon on Sundays" laws) I start to get pissed. If you show up at my house before 10am on a Saturday, you had best have beer or a warrant. A copy of Watchtower magazine ain't going to spare my wrath. When you call me infidel and say you want to cut off my head if I don't convert to your religion, I start tipping my ammo in pig fat so I can send every one of you camel humping shitheads I see to hell. Likewise, when an atheist screeches that a Christmas tree anywhere in sight offends them and it needs to be taken down, I wasnt to bitchslap their fucking teeth down their throats. Leave me alone, and we'll get along fine. I have a lot of respect for the Bhuddists and Wiccans for this very reason. Think about it: when was the last time you saw a headline like "Wiccan suicide bomber kills 5" or "Bhuddist kidnaps and beheads schoolchildren"?

Posted by: Graumagus at February 12, 2007 10:33 AM (LV+mK)

2 I think the majority of people Christian and atheist fall into the category of live and let live - especially in America today. It's that fringe group on either side that will drive us all insane because they insist on shoving their beliefs down everyone's collective throat. As for Paula Zahn... she wants ratings and having a one sided screed going will get people to pay attention to her show - for better or worse. Personally I try not to listen to that crap. *grin*

Posted by: Teresa at February 12, 2007 11:19 AM (gsbs5)

3 Amen, Harvey. ;-)

Posted by: Richmond at February 12, 2007 02:38 PM (e8QFP)

4 Um... If one is going to hold to an irrational belief system (that would be atheism), one must not get bent out of shape when the people who agree with that irrational belief system act irrationally. It's kind of a logical necessity for them to do so. Using only logic, reason, and real observational science, proving the existence of *A* creator takes about 20 minutes of a person's time. Worshiping that logically necessary being is only logical, since one owes one's entire existence to that logically necessary creator. Am I the only one who sees a problem with holding to a religion (atheism most certainly IS a religion...) that justifies the murder of over 100 million people in just one century? The lack of *A* creator is necessary for Communism, National Socialism, 'global warming', Socialism, Totalitarianism, Fascism, and Anarchism (not really anarchy, but, we'll use their idiotic name for it). Other than that, there really isn't anything wrong with atheism. The existence of *A* creator is necessary for freedom, liberty, and capitalism. Other than that, it doesn't really have anything going for it.

Posted by: The Humble Devildog at February 12, 2007 07:36 PM (Njev1)

5 Wait... are you saying Paula Zahn's an atheist? :-)

Posted by: Harvey at February 12, 2007 07:54 PM (L7a63)

6 Calling one's self a Christian and then acting like an atheist would tend to lead others to believe that you are actually an atheist. In addition, without watching the video (Paula Zahn isn't too hard on the eyes, but, that's about her only redeeming quality), I could very easily make the argument that atheists WERE represented on the panel...by Paula Zahn. There are a microscopic amount of non-atheists in the mainstream media outlets (and I include Fox News in that...they're only conservative by comparison), so, it would be safe to assume that any major personality in the MSM would be an atheist, unless otherwise informed. When 98% or so of a demographic holds to certain beliefs, it's not a wise bet to assume one of that demographic will NOT hold to those beliefs.

Posted by: The Humble Devildog at February 12, 2007 08:26 PM (Njev1)

7 I'll pray for you all!

Posted by: wRitErsbLock at February 13, 2007 07:53 AM (+MvHD)

8 For the most part, we Catholic-types don't tend to preach on street corners or knock on doors, but we do pray and hope for our friends... I'm frequently surprised at how misunderstood the Catholic faith is, sometimes (and sometimes especially) even by other 'Cradle-Catholics'. I was raised Catholic - sometimes even 'against my will'. When I rebelled, I was accused of being atheist, and I discovered to my own chagrin that neither was that the case. I settled on agnosticism for a while - even studied other religions to see if I could find a better 'fit'... For rebellion's sake, I even delved into Wicca and the Occult. Personally, I think each person has their own journey. "There are as many paths to Heaven as there are people to walk them." Right now, I'd definitely say I'm not the best Catholic among the ranks - I'm suffering what amounts to a self-imposed separation from the sacraments. I've actually been pretty pissed at God lately. But I have a feeling He understands... I do know that I've experienced some powerful moments of faith in my life. "Miracles" that I can't deny, and true evil, too. Of the two, Evil exists in undeniable abundance in this world - and perhaps ironically, it is THAT which gives me reason to Hope... *slaps and shakes head 'loose'* Whoa, Dude! I never thought I'd go there on Bad Example! /Jeff Spicoli moment

Posted by: Bitterroot at February 13, 2007 08:19 AM (NfSVQ)

9 From my perspective, Catholicism has one good thing going for it - LOTS of ritual. And rituals have a lot of comfort value, especially during hard times.

Posted by: Harvey at February 13, 2007 08:28 AM (L7a63)

10 Plus they have that giant spider... (ducks and runs as the catholics who get the South Park reference start throwing things at me)

Posted by: Graumagus at February 13, 2007 11:06 AM (S1gMo)

11 Damn Grau - now I have to go hunt the "giant spider," 'cuz I have absolutely no idea... I'll deal with YOU later!

Posted by: Bitterroot at February 13, 2007 12:17 PM (bxLrF)

12 For what it's worth, I have noticed that just about every single atheist or agnostic I know used to be Catholic, or came from a Catholic family. Not a lot of former Presbyterians out there among the ranks. I wonder if there's a connection? Yeah, there is.

Posted by: The Humble Devildog at February 13, 2007 08:00 PM (Njev1)

13 Well, by sheer statistics, there are far more Catholics (25.9% pop.) than Presbyterians (2.8%). So you have more chance of meeting a former Catholic than a former Presbyterian atheist/agnostic. And I would suspect that more non-Catholics convert to Catholicism than Catholics becoming atheist or agnostic. (And so many of those former Catholics 'turn-back' as they face death...probably, like Harvey said, because of the comfort of the rituals.) Frankly, however, if I wasn't Catholic, I would want to be Jewish. But I believe in live and let live. I don't think God keeps a scorecard. And if there is no God, it doesn't really matter WHAT you believe. Just play nice.

Posted by: Mrs. Who at February 13, 2007 10:49 PM (9FXen)

14 Okay, so I'm ruminating this religious stuff shortly after having been branded a "Super Geek" and the 'slogan' enters my head... "CathoLinux: We Are root!" Heh. I'm putting that one on a T-Shirt.

Posted by: Bitterroot at February 13, 2007 10:52 PM (9FXen)

15 Last church I attended regularly was Baptist. But I was like 7, so that probably doesn't count.

Posted by: Harvey at February 13, 2007 11:06 PM (L7a63)

Hide Comments | Add Comment